MCViewPoint

Opinion from a Libertarian ViewPoint

Posts Tagged ‘American Rescue Plan Act of 2021’

Erie Times E-Edition Article-Ending child poverty is mission worthy of this great nation

Posted by M. C. on April 4, 2021

Sounds great! But Casey has forgotten we still have LBJ’s war on poverty that began in 1964 with a cost, so far, of $22 trillion.

“I am from the government and am here to help”.

https://erietimes-pa-app.newsmemory.com/?publink=0d93ce59c

Your Turn

Sen. Bob Casey Guest columnist

For too long, America has led the Global North in the number of children living in poverty. Historically, almost one in seven kids in the United States grow up in poverty and the United States has consistently ranked near the bottom of Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries in child poverty rates. Poverty not only affects individual children, but also has broader societal effects, including higher spending on health care, increased rates of crime, reduced rates of educational attainment and higher spending on remedial education. This is unacceptable. Fortunately, the recently enacted

American Rescue Plan legislation takes the largest step since the Great Society of the 1960s to end child poverty in America.

The pandemic and subsequent economic fallout have highlighted the challenges that many children and their parents face: lack of child care, hunger, disparities in health and education access and outcomes, among others. The labor force participation rate for women is the lowest we’ve seen since the 1980s. Women are almost three times as likely as men to not be working due to lack of child care. Access to quality and affordable child care is essential to our nation’s economic recovery as one in five working-age adults said child care was a reason they were not working.

The American Rescue Plan (ARP) has provided a foundation for transformative change in the lives of children in America and working parents across our commonwealth and our country. Under the ARP, Pennsylvania families will receive support from the historic expansions of the Child Tax Credit and the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit. The Child Tax Credit will increase to $3,000 (and to $3,600 for children under age 6). Legislation I authored will expand the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit and will help parents cover up to half the cost of child or dependent care. Working parents can get up to $4,000 for child care expenses for one child or up to $8,000 for two or more kids or dependents. For example, a family making $65,000 with two kids that has $10,000 in child care expenses will receive $5,000. Both tax credits will now be fully refundable, allowing all families to take advantage of the credits.

Responding to the hunger crisis that the pandemic further exacerbated, the ARP also includes immediate food assistance that can reach our most vulnerable children and communities. Through an extension of the 15% increase in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits through the end of September, we can continue to respond to the severity of food insecurity that families now face. An extension of the Pandemic-EBT (P-EBT) program will also provide much needed food assistance through the summer for children when schools are closed and school meals are inaccessible. Additionally, the ARP directs additional investments to vulnerable children through the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) to modernize the program, expand service delivery models, improve outreach and participation and temporarily increase the amount of fruit and vegetables participants can obtain.

Many of the policies in the ARP are consistent with policies that I announced last year in my Five Freedoms for America’s Children proposal. My Five Freedoms proposal suggests a series of polices that, taken together, represent a fulfillment of our commitment to American children. The plan is built on five pillars: The freedom to be healthy, the freedom to be economically secure, the freedom to learn, freedom from hunger and the freedom to be safe from harm. We made extraordinary down payments on a number of these in the ARP, but we have to make them permanent going forward.

We must also set aggressive child poverty reduction targets and measure progress toward them. This target will be critical in sustaining and improving upon any progress made through the important policies in the ARP. My bill, the Child Poverty Reduction Act of 2021 (S. 643), would do this. It would establish a national goal of reducing child poverty by half in 10 years and require annual reporting on the progress we are making toward that goal.

We also know that food insecurity in Pennsylvania and throughout the country will unfortunately outlive the pandemic. For this reason it is essential that we continue to work to address hunger among children. A bill that I will soon introduce, the School Hunger Elimination Act, would expand access to healthy meals and drastically help reduce hunger in schools. As Congress looks to reauthorize the Child Nutrition Act this year, these reforms can help expand eligibility and assistance through school meals to our most vulnerable children and families.

President Biden and Democrats are keeping our promises to millions of Pennsylvanians, investing in our economy and in our workers and lifting half of America’s children out of poverty. Ending poverty among children is a mission worthy of a great nation. With the passage of the ARP, our nation is one step closer to providing vulnerable children with the resources they need to grow and succeed.

Democrat Bob Casey has represented Pennsylvania in the U.S. Senate since 2006.

President Joe Biden signs the American Rescue Plan on March 11 in Washington. Andrew Harnik/AP

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

COVID Aid Bill Would Pay Federal Employees $1400 a Week if Kids Are Out of School – Foundation for Economic Education

Posted by M. C. on February 27, 2021

https://fee.org/articles/covid-aid-bill-would-pay-federal-employees-1400-a-week-if-kids-are-out-of-school/

Jon Miltimore
Jon Miltimore

With thousands of schools still closed or partially closed across the country, millions of American families are struggling to find work-life balance while educating their children at home.

One part of American society may be receiving their own special COVID-19 relief package, however.

In Forbes, Adam Andrzejewski writes that a provision in the $1.9 trillion House bill—“the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021”—would allow federal employees to make up to $1,400 a week without working.

Buried on pages 305-306 of the legislation, the provision creates a $570 million fund for disbursements to federal employees who are not working because they are caring for others because of the coronavirus.

“Among those eligible are those who are ‘unable to work’ because they are caring for school-aged children not physically in school full time due to Covid-19 precautions,” writes Andrzejewski, the CEO and founder of OpenTheBooks.

Under the legislation, full-time federal employees are eligible for 600 hours in paid leave through September, receiving up to $35 an hour.

“That’s 15 weeks for a 40-hour employee,” he writes.

If you’re wondering how federal employees were able wangle a $570 million paid leave fund (on your dime!) into that House bill so they can stay home and get paid while junior does remote learning, look no further.

The union $$ went in the right direction. pic.twitter.com/UWn0woFCmr — Jon Miltimore (@miltimore79) February 25, 2021

In some ways it might seem perfectly reasonable to allow employees to be paid while staying home. The circumstances are unique, after all, and many of us can empathize with parents struggling to work while schools are closed.

There are serious problems with this proposal, however. First, the legislation doesn’t distinguish between a school that is closed and one that simply allows children to learn remotely. As a result, federal employees could simply choose to have their child learn remotely and be eligible for benefits.

“Even if a federal employee’s child could be in school five days a week, if the school ‘makes optional’ virtual or hybrid schooling, it appears the parent can keep the son or daughter at home and still qualify for paid-time off under the bill,” Andrzejewsk writes.

Second, the legislation places no restrictions on a child’s age.

“An open question is whether parents of college-aged children could take paid time off?” Andrzejewsk writes. “Certainly, some colleges are virtual and there is no definition of son or daughter in the bill and no age parameters.”

The biggest problem, however, is that this provision takes money from taxpayers and then hands it out to a specific constituency.

Wow. The BidenBucks bill pays federal employees up to 15 weeks of paid leave at $1400 per week if they have to stay home to virtual school kids.

You get $1400 once. They get it every week for 15 weeks. Swamp takes care of swamp.https://t.co/4A7ktpm1Zc — Phil Kerpen (@kerpen) February 25, 2021

Essentially, the $570 million is a special perk for a select segment of the US workforce: federal employees. According to the Congressional Research Service, there are roughly 2.1 million civilians in the federal workforce, many of whom are represented by labor unions.

The largest union representing federal workers is the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), which represents some 700,000 federal and DC government workers. Then there is the National Federation of Federal Employees (NFFE) and the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU), which represent 110,000 and 150,000 government employees, respectively.

These organizations spent heavily on political causes in 2020. The AFGE alone spent $2.3 million in political contributions and $1.9 million in lobbying. The NTEU spent $760,000 and $1 million on contributions and lobbying, respectively. The political contributions flowed in the same direction (see below).

If you’re wondering how federal employees were able wangle a $570 million paid leave fund (on your dime!) into that House bill so they can stay home and get paid while junior does remote learning, look no further.

The union $$ went in the right direction. pic.twitter.com/UWn0woFCmr — Jon Miltimore (@miltimore79) February 25, 2021

Purchasing influence and perks—like 600 hours of paid leave—might sound crass or even seedy, but it’s one of the primary purposes of unions.

As the economist Hans F. Sennholz observed, governments and unions are essentially “allies in interventionism.” They seek to circumvent free markets to seize and consume the wealth of others through coercive means. And in exchange for votes and influence, unions are rewarded by the politicians with special privileges for their members.

“Labor unions deliver political votes to administrations that promise to be friendly and cooperative,” wrote Sennholz, a longtime teacher of economics and former FEE president. “The administrations in return create legal privileges and immunities for labor unions so that they may be more effective in their economic struggle.”

If you think that sounds a bit like a quid pro quo, you’re not wrong. Unions have made it clear, even publicly, that they expect returns for all those dollars and door knocking.

“Those who would oppose, delay or derail this legislation, do not ask us—do not ask the labor movement—for a dollar or a door knock,” AFL-CIO union leader Richard Trumka warned lawmakers before a key House vote last year. “We won’t be coming.”

All workers like job perks, of course. And here is nothing wrong with receiving perks from an employer. But they should pass the test of the free market—not be mandated by the government or subsidized by taxpayers.

The economist Percy L. Greaves Jr. once explained the difference between how unions operate compared to free markets.

“The free market operates according to the Golden Rule. The higher values one contributes to the marketplace, as valued by consumers, the more one receives in return,” wrote Greaves Jr., a longtime writer for US News and World Report. “Free market operations are always voluntary transactions by which all parties exchange something they have for something on which they place a higher value.”

Many parents would no doubt desire having 600 hours in paid leave to stay home while their children do virtual learning—especially since newly issued CDC guidelines would keep 90 percent of schools at least partially closed.

Few of us will have that option, however. Because the action doesn’t make economic sense. It only makes political sense. But that’s what matters when Congress spends trillions of our money. FEE’s Brad Polumbo recently highlighted 10 provisions in the $1.9 trillion stimulus bill that appear to be little more than “partisan kickbacks.”

Sadly, you can make this one number 11—and we’ve only just started looking.

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »