While the entire world knows that Debbie Wasserman-Schultz was anything but a neutral chair of the DNC during the Democrat primaries, to hear her openly admit that she was working for Hillary Clinton on TV is a stunning admission…but also shows the untouchability that those around Hillary feel.

Remember that to this day, Wasserman-Schultz has not been put in prison for voter fraud. She also happily, and without any hesitation, took a job with Hillary’s presidential campaign team after she resigned from her DNC chair position, following the Wikileaks revelations of DNC voter rigging.

It was Clinton’s way of rewarding Wasserman-Schultz for a job well done during the primaries.

Of course the biggest loser, and total fool, in all of this is none other than Bernie Sanders, who not only was played by his own party, but then showed what a total coward he is by throwing his full support behind Hillary Clinton in a pathetic and sad DNC convention speech.

Even though Wasserman-Schultz denied her corruption after the Wikileaks story broke, she could not hold back her satisfaction for “getting away with it” during her appearance on Facing South Florida on Sunday where she debated Tim Cavona who is challenging her South Florida House seat.

Wasserman Schultz said she was “very proud of her tenure” at the DNC and that she was a key part in getting Barack Obama reelected in 2012. Then Wasserman Schultz went a bit further…

“The work we did to prepare for Hillary Clinton, to be our nominee and then make sure that we could get her elected president, is absolutely critical to advancing the issues that are important.”

? #DumpDebbie MT @Parker9_ WOW–@DWStweets accidentally admits the truth during the debate this am.

WATCH & RETWEET: pic.twitter.com/EP1uMZG8Sa

— Ms Walden E (@WaldenE) August 15, 2016

DeFede’s first question toWasserman Schultz was about Wikileaks DNC email leaks, including ones that discussed Sanders’ Jewish religion.

Wasserman Schultz said she “absolutely condemned the exchange.” DeFede then asked whether the emails were part of a culture that she had created while at the DNC.

? #DumpDebbie MT @Parker9_ WOW–@DWStweets accidentally admits the truth during the debate this am.

WATCH & RETWEET: pic.twitter.com/EP1uMZG8Sa

— Ms Walden E (@WaldenE) August 15, 2016

FORMER DNC CHAIR CAUGHT TELLING THE TRUTH…BTW SHE STILL ISNT IN JAIL FOR VOTER FRAUD.. https://t.co/RZPd8iZ4QE

— AngryAmericansUnited (@LastWave2014) August 15, 2016

RT reports further on more scandal in and around Hillary Clinton, including Wasserman-Schultz trying to backtrack and divert from her slip up, by parroting what appears to be the Hillary Clinton team go-to-line when faced with tough questioning…“the Russian did it”.

Notice how Wasserman-Schultz is repeating the same exact keywords that Nancy Pelosi said just a few days ago, after her email hack…notably “21st century Watergate” and “Russian” hack victims.

Everything is perfectly scripted to avoid the painful truth.

When pressed to stick to the Wikileaks revelations, Wasserman Schultz described the hack as a “21st century Watergate.”

“We were the victims of Russian espionage,” she said. “Who stole private emails and our data and then gave them to the organization Wikileaks.”

Wasserman Schultz was also asked about emails that suggest she used DNC resources for her own election, through monitoring of her rival.

Canova pointed to a “pattern” of media suppression within the emails, citing an email sent by Wasserman Schultz which asked Chuck Todd to get Morning Joe’s Mika Brzezinski to issue an apology for accusing the DNC chair of treating Sanders unfairly.

Wasserman Schultz has also faced recent criticism for setting debate terms for the congressional seat that saw her face surging Canova on Sunday at 8:00am. The congresswoman has refused Cavona’s suggestions of holding three debates before the August 30 primary.

This echoes accusations levied at the Wasserman-Schultz by Sanders supporters who said she purposely set Democratic primary debates at times when viewership was likely to be low, which they argued was an attempt to prevent Sanders’ message steering votes away from Clinton. A charge which has gathered weight in light of the contents of the DNC email leak.