MCViewPoint

Opinion from a Libertarian ViewPoint

Posts Tagged ‘human respect’

Human Respect in One Lesson

Posted by M. C. on March 1, 2022

Theft and violence always lead to…

We call this exception agency delegation. Agents undertake actions on our behalf. In this case, someone else steals, and perhaps we benefit from it. But because we didn’t directly undertake the action, we can pretend we’re not culpable. It can even mean that if someone else initiates violence, and I cheer it, I’m still a good person because I didn’t actually commit the act.

The Exit Network

Theft and violence always reduce happiness, harmony, and prosperity. Always.

That’s a principle. Whenever we can repeatedly observe a cause and effect relationship in nature and state it as a testable formula, we have a principle. It’s like gravity. You can threaten to drop a bowling ball from the 20th story of a building, and before you do it, we can not only predict that it will fall to the ground but also tell you how fast the ball will fall.

Theft and violence always reduce happiness, harmony, and prosperity. Always.

How do we know?

Everyone is always pursuing happiness. Our actions are designed to make us happier.

Some actions are for immediate gratification, such as enjoying an ice cream cone, and some acts are for long-term gains, like going to college. Happier now or happier later, either way, we’re pursuing happiness.

Pursuing happiness sometimes involves competing values. Life can be hard. Sometimes we choose a harder thing, something we don’t really want to do because we prize something else even more. We might even make sacrifices, perhaps caring for a family member who doesn’t appreciate it, because we’d be even less happy if we didn’t live by our values. Indeed, sometimes we only have bad options, yet we choose the one we believe will deliver the most relative happiness.

No matter what happens, we want to maximize our happiness. It’s a fundamental drive.

Many people walking on a city street, with sunlight bursting through a tree
Everyone is pursuing happiness

The statement, “everyone is always pursuing happiness,” is an axiom. An axiom is a self-evident fact. It doesn’t require a fancy defense. Is there anything you just read that isn’t self-evident?

There are two other axioms of human nature that we can add to the fact that everyone has a fundamental drive to be happy. The experience of…

  • Physical harm always decreases a person’s happiness.
  • Theft or property damage always decreases the owner’s happiness.

In other words, a mugging comes as a surprise. No one would walk (with normal obliviousness) down the path where the assault and battery were to occur, if they knew in advance it was coming. So those are obvious statements. Indeed, they are both axioms.

But if we want a better world, where you, me, and others around us can experience well-being and even flourish, it should provoke a question…

WHY would they avoid that path?

Because it would diminish their happiness!

Theft and violence always reduce happiness. Always.

Well, not just happiness. Let’s be more precise. People tend to think of happiness as an emotion. Call it joy or a sense of flourishing. But it takes two other primary forms.

We want the resources necessary to provide for our needs and our wants. We call that prosperity, and we each get to define it for ourselves. Human wants vary tremendously. We may want more possessions, to provide for our family, to have the ability to share or give gifts, to pursue hobbies and avocations, or something else.

On top of that, vandalism, mugging, rape, and murder are disturbances of the peace. We call these acts crime, and the persons experiencing these acts, victims. Victims want to be free of crime. We all want to live our lives in harmony.

Put that all together, and now we have the complete picture, and we can derive a principle.

Theft and violence always reduce happiness, harmony, and prosperity. Always.

Now…

Do you consider yourself a good person?

See the rest here

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Don’t get no respect?

Posted by M. C. on March 18, 2021

https://www.theadvocates.org/human-respect-tests/?mc_cid=536a36ce48

Human Respect Tests

How respectful are you?

Duration: 3 Minutes

3 to 10 questions depending on how you score.

Test Your Beliefs

See to what extent your beliefs are respectful or coercive.

Share Your Results

See how your beliefs compare to your friends. Pick Your Political Type Or take the political quiz

Human Respect Test for Libertarians

Libertarians seek to maximize human freedom and minimize coercion in personal or economic matters.Libertarian Test

Human Respect Test for Progressives

Progressives usually embrace freedom of choice in personal matters, but advocate for significant government coercion to control the economy and redistribute wealth.Progressive Test

Human Respect Test for Conservatives

Conservatives tend to favor economic freedom, but frequently support laws to restrict personal behavior that violates “traditional values.”Conservative Test

Human Respect Test for Moderates

Moderates tend to prefer a “middle ground” regarding the use of coercion and government control, whether of the economy or of personal behavior. Moderate Test

Human Respect Test for Authoritarians

Authoritarians want the government to have a great deal of power over the economy and individual behavior.Authoritarian Test

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

How manufactured outrage is robbing you – The Exit Network

Posted by M. C. on March 17, 2021

The Conflict Machine is ruining our shopping habits and tearing the social fabric

https://theexitnetwork.substack.com/p/how-manufactured-outrage-is-robbing

The Exit Network

Professional observers and reporters are pointing out the social dangers of the Conflict Machine (our escalating political war). Here are two new pieces on the subject.

Mendacious philistines won’t drag me into social media wars

“What the hell am I doing with my life?” wonders Matthew Walther, in The Week.

In observation of the social media aspect of the Conflict Machine, he writes…

Escape the outrage.

In all of these and goodness knows how many other cases… what was being elicited was an intense fury that, upon a moment’s reflection, I realized I did not actually feel. This is not because I do not care about truth or justice or any of the rather grand-sounding words trotted out by online philosophes whenever we do these things, but because even when I squint and see how they enter at least proximately into the incident, it is not clear to me what my being outraged would accomplish. If anything, one suspects that by expressing my own anger, I would be giving tacit assent to the modish outrage that seems to be the only means by which we have public conversations in this country.

Walther is not without remedies

He notes that many in these online wars are arguing for way too many things simply because their team does so, and not because they themselves appreciate it. Maybe you should only speak up for things you really understand and truly care about.

Walther also suggests that not everyone online is arguing in good faith. This led to our favorite line in the piece, “attempt[ing] meaningful adult conversation, which is a bit like trying to convince someone making fart noises that your preferred translation of an 11th-century Japanese court romance is worth reading.”


The Conflict Machine is ruining our shopping habits and tearing the social fabric

J.D. Tuccille, contributing to Reason.com, writes, “Is there anything that politics can’t ruin? The answer, it appears, is a resounding ‘no’ as partisan conflict creeps into all areas of American life. Our political affiliations, researchers say, obstruct friendships, influence our purchases, affect the positions we take on seemingly apolitical matters, and limit our job choices. As a result, many people are poorer, lonelier, and less healthy than they would otherwise be.”

Tuccille cites a 2020 survey indicating “83% of Millennials find it important for the companies they buy from to align with their values” and another 59% of American consumers “will buy or boycott a brand solely because of its position on a social or political issue.”

This means it’s less about price, utility, and even rational reason that’s guiding consumer decisions. More and more Americans are sacrificing those values to go along with their political echo chambers.

But the damage goes beyond the question of consumers making wise decisions.

Dave Sprott, the author of a journal article that inspired Tuccille’s piece, writes, “Ultimately, polarization harms mental and physical health, financial welfare, relationships and societal interests through its impact on psychology, marketing and public policy outcomes.”


Exit the Machine

The Conflict Machine is a more descriptive label for our politics. The stakes are high. Americans believe they have the ability to coerce others, to force them to live by their values, or pay for stuff they want.

Somebody has to lose those fights. Certainly, we don’t want to end up on the losing side. Therefore, we fight. And the stakes are getting even higher.

Politics ruins everything. But there is an alternative path out of this exhausting conflict. We can lay down our weapons and instead practice…

Human Respect.

Human Respect is based on a principle. Happiness and social peace never increase when people are coerced to act against their will, let alone assaulted with violence. It’s as consistent as gravity- interfere with happiness, diminish social peace.

You see the Conflict Machine at work on social media and in boycotts. The social division is obvious. You can escape politics.

First, practice Human Respect. Let it never be said of you that you cheered, let alone voted for, excessive force against others. Governing ‘good and hard’ is never our solution.

Second, adopt a Human Respect value system to create real and lasting social reform. You can do so without changing your liberal or conservative values! Instead of lobbying, or worse, boycotts and social media rants against those who disagree with you, choose trade, charity, mutual aid, voluntary association, and persuasion to make the world a better place.

If this kind of thinking appeals to you, then meet The Exit Network. Please Subscribe to get more.

Jim Babka is the host of The Exit Network. Joanna Blaine contributed to this piece.

Our website is Coming Soon!

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Four things only libertarians can see about COVID-19

Posted by M. C. on April 7, 2020

What is unseen are the variety of harms that occur because people have been denied freedom of association and movement.

Second, don’t overlook the harm caused by government actors.

No matter the doomsday scenario, it’s hard to imagine a single governor (or president) outsmarting millions of people.

The Principle of Human Respect is a natural, cause-and-effect relationship. If I rob you at gunpoint, your happiness decreases. Social harmony and prosperity are diminished too.

https://www.theadvocates.org/2020/03/four-things-only-libertarians-can-see-about-covid-19/

A new form of political correctness has spread, like a virus, across the fruited plain. Libertarians are taking heat – getting angry responses for criticizing governors who have used the spread of COVID-19 to issue edicts that shutter businesses and impose martial law-like schemes.

coronavirus covid-19 libertarians politics

Still, libertarians find they cannot keep quiet. Their philosophy of self-government is forged in an understanding of consequences. Libertarians are the only members of society who can see – even foresee – the following four things about the State’s edicts and regulations…

The seen and the unseen

First, libertarians can visualize the Unseen.

What is seen is that which is obvious to us. In the present case, it’s easy for us to see the way the virus is spreading and how the healthcare system is overrun in Italy.

What is unseen are the variety of harms that occur because people have been denied freedom of association and movement. Politicians are using wartime powers and preening before TV cameras. There will be short-term and long-term effects stemming from their actions. Nearly everyone, especially the regime media, is overlooking these costs.

The proper way to analyze this situation is to take all of the effects into account.

Libertarians are just like you; they’re sheltering and practicing physical distance. But let’s be clear, not everyone has that luxury. There’s no way that a governor could anticipate, let alone solve all of these sticky issues. Edicts are “one size fits all.” Each person understands their unique situation better than a politician in a distant capitol could. There are many scenarios to consider. Here’s a sampling…

  • Right now, families are trapped in a home with an abuser. Perhaps the abuser’s workday was a time of relief, or the victim’s school or work was an escape path to safety.
  • Suicides will increase during the crisis.
  • Addiction will worsen because the sense of purpose or even mere interruption that occupational work provides has been stolen away.
  • Businesses that were operating on a thin margin will fold, crushing dreams, resulting in unemployment, and even reducing supply. Supply reductions will fuel price increases for all of us.

Notice State failures

Second, don’t overlook the harm caused by government actors. For example, Donald Trump’s aides were afraid to give their reelection-minded boss any bad news until it was too late. And the sudden, jarring, gubernatorial edicts have caused fear, uncertainty, and doubt – provoking shortages.

In a libertarian world, reliable tests would already be for sale! And if the tests were universally available, the crisis would’ve been far smaller and Americans would be back to work.

There are two reasons tests are not already on the market.

  1. Political suppression of information. If they had gotten the signal earlier, then entrepreneurs, inventors, and existing businesses would’ve started delivering tests by now. We know there was sufficient time because a handful of U.S. Senators were briefed in January. After seeing the impending crisis, they sold off their stocks.
  2. Ironically, regulations are supposed to make us safer. What they do instead is create barriers which increase delays and costs. Frequently, the innovator realizes that no action is profitable, choosing not to invent (another unseen effect). The FDA has been in the way of tests getting to market.

Wisdom of the crowd

Third, self-government is the best solution to the Knowledge Problem. No matter the doomsday scenario, it’s hard to imagine a single governor (or president) outsmarting millions of people.

No matter how brilliant the governor and his or her advisors are, he or she lacks the capacity to win a problem-solving contest against tens of millions of people.

Worse, political acts are prone to cause injuries (which tend to be unseen and unreported). The miracle of “stuff” arriving on our store shelves involves millions of micro-decisions. Sudden edicts have replaced that. Shortages result because the governor deploys unanticipated force. Consider…

Restaurants who planned menus suddenly have too much food. Grocery stores, who thought people would be at restaurants, find that they have new customers instead. The restaurant owner takes a bath.

Even with nearly-empty shelves, stores need to make sure they don’t over-order in response. Grocers know these effects are temporary, but they don’t know when they will end. They don’t want to end up like the restaurants, stuck with too much stock on hand. Uncertainty prevails. Shortages will remain a problem until governors back out of the equation.

Human respect

Fourth and most important of all, is the matter of Human Respect. The libertarian uniquely recognizes that everyone seeks happiness and that no one person can make everyone happy.

The Principle of Human Respect is a natural, cause-and-effect relationship. If I rob you at gunpoint, your happiness decreases. Social harmony and prosperity are diminished too.

Since this is a principle, even governors cannot violate it. Bans and edicts are ultimately enforced by armed men and women. These are not acts of persuasion; they are threats to achieve a desired result. When anyone, be they a criminal or your governor, coerces another human being, they never increase happiness. And in the present situation, the bans have obviously decreased social peace and material prosperity.

The damage to prosperity is already so obvious that no one is contesting it.

And before the governors started acting, we had peaceful cooperation. Most people were already practicing physical distancing. We also witnessed allegedly greedy corporations voluntarily sacrificing many millions of dollars. To prevent the spread of COVID-19 the NCAA closed events to the public. Then, the NBA suspended its season and Disney closed its parks. Like falling dominoes, tons of businesses followed.

AFTER that, governors forced the holdouts to close. Libertarians began raising important questions like the four you’ve just reviewed. They’re getting accused of wanting to clog hospitals and increase the death toll. Therefore, consider the role politicians are playing. Are their acts increasing harmony or did they introduce new divisions into our society?

Be seeing you

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »