Education vs Indoctrination
Be seeing you
Posted by M. C. on September 20, 2024
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: Homeschooling, indoctrination, Woke Educators | Leave a Comment »
Posted by M. C. on June 2, 2021
Strange it is that a disarmed and helpless West is so well defended by the one thousand billion dollar annual budget of the military/security complex and the 700 or so overseas military bases of the Disunited States. But this is no defense of Western civilization. It is a defense of the power and budgets of defense contractors, CIA and other “intelligence agencies,” the supply chains for defense industries, the university physics and chemistry faculties on Defense Department grants, the political campaign contributions that flow back from the military industries to candidates for the House, Senate, and Oval Office.
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2021/06/01/without-truth-there-is-no-freedom/
Paul Craig Roberts
June brings my quarterly request for donations. Your financial support for the website tells me that my efforts are valued and worthwhile. Your donations support me in standing up to the smears. Telling the truth in America in these days is a punished, not a rewarded, activity.
The United States is best understood today as the Disunited States. There is less unity than in 1860. Civility is gone from debate; indeed, debate itself is gone. Integrity and respect for truth have lost out to worship of money and the rule of power. Ideology has shoved aside facts.
Money and power are all. We have seen this in the intentional exaggeration of the Covid threat for Big Pharma profits and the institutionalization of arbitrary government power over civil liberty. Today, with the exception of some free Red states, such as Florida, in the Disunited States our exercise of our civil liberty requires the government’s permission. You are free only by the government’s permission. In other words, the US Constitution has lost its authority. We now live under the authority of the power seekers.
Government and corporate spying have destroyed privacy, another Constitutionally protected right.
Education has been replaced with cult indoctrination. In blue states and in some local school districts of red states, white American students are taught that they are racist by nature. They are infused with personal guilt for slavery that ended 156 years ago. Speech codes are imposed that prevent any challenge to the propaganda masquerading as eduction. The brainwashing of white Americans is imposed by law in blue states such as California, Washington, Oregon, and New York. Parents who complain are fired by their corporate employers who have imbibed the Critical Race Theory kool-aid. No American who works for a US corporation has freedom of speech.
It is today ordinary for white liberals to speak of “exterminating whiteness.” Whether they realize it or not, it includes themselves. What is meant by exterminating whiteness? The most radical mean it literally—the genocide of white people. White people being systemic racists are inconsistent with “social justice.” Most white liberals, such as those on blue state school boards, mean by exterminating whiteness the extermination of “white values,” such as meritocracy and colorblindness.
Colorblindness meant that the best person got the job regardless of race. It was seen as a way of guaranteeing that a meritorius black person would not be passed over because of race. But white liberals now say that colorblindness is a white value that upholds meritocracy, whereas “equity” requires that blacks advance because of race, not because of merit.
Exterminating whiteness also means taking down white monuments, burning or delisting white books, rewriting white history as one vast ongoing crime. Essentially what is required of us is that we reject and denounce Western civilization. If you don’t denounce your civilization, it is proof that you are a racist.
It started years ago—“Western Civ has to go.” The white liberals thought this was great–denounce your own civilization.
Another way of eliminating whiteness is open borders to peoples of color who eventually outnumber and rule the minority whites. The Camp of the Saints explains what to expect. Already we see in the Western world governments more responsive to immigrant-invaders than to ethnic citizens.
Many older patriotic Americans dismiss the assaults on whiteness as silly nonsense. It is silly, and it is nonsense, but it is nevertheless highly successful in destroying the system of beliefs that comprise Western civilization. Indeed, the destruction of the beliefs—the glue—that hold our civilization together is almost complete. People such as Martyanov, the Saker, Dimetri Orlov, and myself see collapse staring us in the face. We all hope that we don’t outlive its occurance.
In the West everything is denunciatory. Nothing is affirmatory. So many decades of denunciation of the West’s crimes has collapsed belief. The West is disarmed and helpless.
Strange it is that a disarmed and helpless West is so well defended by the one thousand billion dollar annual budget of the military/security complex and the 700 or so overseas military bases of the Disunited States. But this is no defense of Western civilization. It is a defense of the power and budgets of defense contractors, CIA and other “intelligence agencies,” the supply chains for defense industries, the university physics and chemistry faculties on Defense Department grants, the political campaign contributions that flow back from the military industries to candidates for the House, Senate, and Oval Office.
The one thousand billion dollar annual “defense” budget requires an enemy, and this requirement negates any security from the vast sum expended. Despite the Defense budget, it is far more dangerous to have an enemy than not to have one. Having Russia as an enemy enhances the defense budget and reduces our safety. For the sake of the power and profit of the US military/security complex Washington needs the Russian threat to keep the money flowing.
But what country in its right mind would want as an enemy a nuclear armed country whose weapons systems were far superior to its own?
During the 20th century Cold War the US and Soviet leaders worked to reduce tensions. Arms control treaties were agreed, and communication was kept open. This saved the world from many false alarms of incoming ICBMs. Today the tensions, thanks to Clinton, Bush, Obama, and Biden, are so high that false alarms will be believed. The world can end simply because of a false alarm.
For expressing concern together with Stephen Cohn, now deceased to our great loss, that a nuclear war could be the consequence of a lack of trust between Washington and Moscow, I was accused of “Putin worship” by Michael C. Moynihan, a person of no known achievement at a website called “The Daily Beast.”
The digital revolution has endowed journalism with minimal intelligence and minimal integrity. As Udo Ulfkotte wrote in his 2014 book, they are Bought Journalists.
These bought journalists respect money more than life. If the world experiences nuclear Armageddon, it will be the fault of the Western Presstitutes who helped the military/security complex resurrect the Cold War.
Be seeing you
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: Disunited States, Freedom, indoctrination, truth | Leave a Comment »
Posted by M. C. on January 30, 2020
In order for the state to gain the long-term loyalty of the people, indoctrination is required.
It is thus necessary that the individual should finally come to realize that his own ego is of no importance in comparison with the existence of the nation, that the position of the individual is conditioned solely by the interests of the nation as a whole.
~ Adolf Hitler (1938). “Adolf Hitler from Speeches 1933-1938”
Collectivism is not a new idea, but it is one that now consumes America, and since collectivism is based upon the destruction of individual intellect in favor of group sameness, it must be squashed at every turn if freedom is truly sought. Nationalism is a belief that one’s nation is superior to all others, and that group devotion to the State is paramount. These are obviously similar terms, with differences only at the extreme margin, but both require a single-minded belief in the false assumption of the “greater good.” It has been said by many, but any acceptance or adherence to the dishonest concept of the greater good will simply lead to the greater evil.
While there are differences to be sure, when one compares the beliefs and actions of Nazi Germany to today’s United States, there are stark similarities. This is a very disturbing revelation, and one that should be examined. For my purposes here, this is not specifically about any particular past or current ruler or president, it is much more than that, because it is concerning society at large, and how an entire nation can be easily manipulated to accept slavery in the name of safety, and in doing so, also accept the inevitable carnage and tyranny that comes with such weakness of mind.
One of the most obvious likenesses between the general populations of Germany in the 1930s and 1940s and the U.S. today was the rampant nationalism and belief of exceptionalism held by the Nazis then, and the American masses now. In Hitler’s national socialist party rule, all of Germany came together as one in support of the nation-state, with a full belief that they were the exceptional people. In the U.S. today, the fascist and socialistic oligarchy that is in place is dependent on national unity, which has been brought about by extreme fear mongering, little different than in Nazi Germany. One of the most prevalent underpinnings of the population in America today is the national feeling of being exceptional to those in other lands. Those in Nazi Germany were taught to be afraid of mixing with other races, especially the Jewish people, and felt exceptional to them. Americans today have similar feelings about the Muslims in the Middle East. They are afraid of this purposely structured and false “terrorist” threat, and feel superior to the people that are a manufactured enemy.
In order for the state to gain the long-term loyalty of the people, indoctrination is required. In Germany under Hitler, the government, specifically the Reich Ministry of Education, took control of the education system in 1934 in order to indoctrinate the youth. The goal was to produce strength so as to build a population that would be willing and able to war, and that would always fully support the state. Later, the creation of the National Socialist Teacher’s League, with mandated affiliation in order to teach, was established. Grades suffered, and dumbing down became evident, but the goals of the state were met so that all children were brainwashed from a very young age to support the state and become good citizens. In the United States, this same process of mandated state-controlled education had begun much earlier, but was done incrementally over a longer time. Similar results were sought, but American students were to be schooled just enough to make them good workers and citizens, and this plan was also designed to advance loyalty to the nation-state. The indoctrination of German and American children has much in common, and the results show less individualism, less intellect, and more nationalism. Both countries were successful in their efforts to control the general population by controlling the minds of the children through brainwashing techniques.
The Germany of the early and mid-twentieth century desired to be the controlling power, and also had a national feeling of superiority over much of the rest of the world. Has not the United States desired and obtained the title of world super-power, and do not Americans also now believe that they are exceptional to most of those in the rest of the world? This is no accident. Germany wanted to spread Nazism and the U.S. claims to spread democracy. Both Nazism and democracy are socialistic in nature, and the efforts to advance both require extreme force, control, murder, and war.
The belief in Germany at the time was that the few could be sacrificed for the many; in other words, the individual should be sacrificed for the greater good of society or nation. Generally speaking, both the Germany of old and America today hold this same position. It is one that demands tyrannical rule and a loss of freedom instead of individual rights. This thinking is completely incompatible with liberty.
My purpose here is not to declare that America today is the same as Nazi Germany. The two situations are certainly different in many ways, but at the same time, the similarities are astounding. The German government attempted to gain world power, and was a barbarous regime bent on total control. In the process, millions of innocent victims fell to the Third Reich through aggressive means and world war. German citizens while mostly held hostage, did support many of the state’s crimes, and did so with nationalistic fervor. When put in these simple terms, Americans looking in the mirror should become very disturbed.
The United States became the world’s leading power long ago due to continuous aggressive war, to the buildup of the largest and most aggressive military and deadly weaponry on planet earth, and for the building and occupation of over 800 bases on foreign soil. In the process, the U.S. has been responsible for tens of millions of deaths of innocent men, women, and children around the world just since the defeat of Germany in WWII. So how could any claim to be different or exceptional with a record of slaughter of this magnitude?
Tyranny is nurtured by national pride and false ego. This leads to more power over the individual, and therefore over society as a whole. This causes perpetual war to be waged in order to control the masses by fear. By eliminating the power structure, wars will cease, and individual liberty can flourish. Tearing down the government will eliminate tyrannical rule, and once again place the individual in a position of importance instead of allowing the evil that is the greater good.
Sometimes things are not as they seem, reality is not so clear, and egotistical views come back to haunt the soul. The mirror is our friend, for accepting truth, and improving self brings peace.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: Collectivism, Greater Good, indoctrination, Ministry of Education, Nazi Germany | Leave a Comment »
Posted by M. C. on October 1, 2019
http://www.unz.com/article/student-debt-cancellation-a-good-idea-and-a-political-hoax/
Debt Cancellation will come whether we like it or not. So it’s in everyone’s interest to develop a sensible plan that liberates the (mostly) innocent and assigns responsibility where appropriate.
There are certain moments in history where each person—and eventually the larger community—must decide which path to follow, ultimately leading us in vastly different directions. With the U.S. student debt fiasco now approaching $1.6 trillion and 45 million borrowers, we seem to be rapidly advancing towards such a moment.
At present, one of the biggest problems regarding the student loan debacle is the dismal nature of the polarized “debate.” Not just on debt relief, but on the many dysfunctions of the college system and its financing mechanisms as well.
On one side, we have free-lunch Democrats that want to “give” everything away in order to buy votes and seize control of higher education; their Debt Forgiveness schemes merely dump liabilities onto taxpayers and give banks and colleges a free pass. Republicans and conservatives, meanwhile, prefer to lecture students on the morality of paying your bills, while forgetting that students didn’t create the corrupt system of mandatory college or its skyrocketing costs. That came from “responsible” adults. And both sides insist that federal involvement in all levels of learning is essential.
Since Debt Cancellation is one of those explosive topics that can lead to partisan bickering and empty sloganeering, I should start by saying that I disagree with nearly everything that BOTH official sides are saying. After much searching, I was able to find a few sensible voices in the wilderness as detailed and expanded upon later. But at this point, anything rational or productive on this issue remains strictly forbidden in the mainstream press, which strongly favors centralized banking and collective education, preferably sold in easily digestible sound-bites.
Taking a broader approach to this looming decision, the major themes of this essay are:
I’ll try to fill in some related gaps along the way, mainly to address entrenched ideologies on overall education and financing.
My conclusions are: 1) people can learn quite well without federal involvement and the suffocating strings attached, 2) after over a century of massive (over 2,000%) inflationary stresses, Americans could benefit from an overdue Inflation Dividend, and 3) student Debt Cancellation will come whether we like it or not, so it’s in everyone’s interest to develop a sensible debt re-structuring plan that liberates the (mostly) innocent and assigns responsibility where appropriate. As for culpability, I’m talking about banks and colleges, not taxpayers.
For demographics, I don’t mind saying that I turned 50 this year and never had any debt from college when I graduated in 1991, back when state school in New York was pretty cheap. I work in the private sector and find time to research and write on the side, among other things.
Washington Orthodoxy: Education Must Be Centrally Controlled
With “education” becoming increasingly politicized over the last century, it’s hard to find valuable information through the haze of overt and subtle misinformation. As usual, if you follow the money it leads back to a common theme. Total government spending for combined federal, state and local levels (K through college) came to a staggering $1.1 trillion for FY2019. That enormous pot of “free” gold comes with heavy strings attached and influences nearly all modern decisions on the topic of learning.
First of all, both parties in Washington and at the State capitols almost unanimously view individual learning as a group decision. Proceeding from that bias, public schools in America have become burdened with licensing restrictions, teacher credentials and accreditation requirements to justify accessing their “fair” share of public funds. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: Debt Forgiveness, Fed, free college, indoctrination, literacy rates, Student Debt | Leave a Comment »
Posted by M. C. on September 19, 2019
By Sarah Surette
Everyone has beliefs and habits that they carry into adulthood with them. Some of these are harmless remnants of childhood, like holding your breath as you go through a tunnel or skipping over cracks in the sidewalk.
Others tend to be larger and more abstract, like the environment in which a child learns or if they tend to see things in a more objective or subjective light. For many, these things are fairly set once you reach adulthood. They can only be “untaught” through conscious effort. Many children grow up immersed in the belief systems and moral compasses of their parents. Indoctrination in one way or another is inevitable.
The education system, for many, is a huge part of that indoctrination. In school, a child is told what is essential to learn. They are being handed all of the information necessary to pass tests. Those tests, combined with class participation and completed homework, make up the grades that will get the child into a good college. They are conditioned to take information and retain it without question.
In my previous article, I explained why unschooling–encouraging a child to use their natural curiosity to direct their own learning– is vital to our society.
When children are removed from a traditional school environment to be unschooled, it is highly recommended that they first go through a “deschooling process”. This process, and the need for it, is explained in greater detail by Ivan Illich in his book Deschooling Society.
Illich explains that, “The public is indoctrinated to believe that skills are valuable and reliable only if they are the result of formal schooling.” Through deschooling, a child sheds the belief that learning can only occur when it is being fed to them or overseen. It paves the way for an entirely new way of thinking.
Deschooling is just as important for the parents as it is for the child. The parents often find themselves grappling with what they think versus what they have been told to think. Their own indoctrination, at this point, is deeply rooted and much harder to reverse. Unschooling is counter-cultural and, as such, the parents will often face quite a bit of pushback from the culture in which they live.
Usually, this will come when a child is seen outside of school during school hours. A stranger at the grocery store, library or playground will ask why the child is not in school and be surprised, even incredulous, at the answer.
Family members may think that the parents are doing a disservice to their child by keeping them away from all that the school system has to offer. When this happens, nothing has gone wrong. If anything, it should serve as a reminder to the parents that they are choosing to unschool for a reason.
This process is not exclusively beneficial for school-aged children and their families. Any adult can and should go through a deschooling, or deprograming, process. Since school is such a large part of a child’s life, and school programs a child to believe that essential information can only be that which is handed to them, some part of that mentality must be carried into adulthood. The news, various authorities and preconceived notions take the place of teachers in the adult world. So many adults are being programmed, from childhood, to accept information from authority and process it as fact.
Deschooling for a child is, essentially, helping them to clear the regimented, traditional school from their system. This process does not have a time limit. The learning will begin when the child is ready, when their natural desire to learn is reawakened.
For the parent, deschooling is a letting go of the belief that there needs to be a system. There are no grades, no outside authority to tell them or their child what is essential to know and no tests to mark progress. It is a complete trust in the child’s innate desire to learn.
When a parent and child are deschooling, it could look like:
The purpose of these seemingly unrelated things is to help the child (and parent) let go of dependence on a curriculum to learn what is necessary.
When an adult sets out to deschool, or deprogram, themselves it could look like:
For both children and adults, this process is imperative to shedding the dependence on outside sources for information and approval or disapproval. It is the beginning steps of a departure from a set, societally approved way of living and thinking.
Deschooling is the beginning steps toward a lifetime of creativity, love of learning and self-trust.
Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: Deschooling, Detox, education system, indoctrination | Leave a Comment »
Posted by M. C. on June 11, 2019
Or rather, rational self-preservation is rewarded by you shutting your mouth and not going off script. Why? Because for every Jordan Peterson who gets rich when a Progressive mob of inquisitors comes for him, how many unknown Jordan Petersons are there who committed career suicide whom you never hear about because they were open about their traditional beliefs — and as a result, never got hired?
…
The Progressive Left has a seminary, too — a finishing school where the ambitious and well schooled are polished to become “ministers” of their religion. It is the American university system.
The average high school graduate of promise often has no idea what world he is entering. All he knows is that all of his teachers have encouraged him from kindergarten until the end of his senior year that, if he has the talent and ability, he must go to college. The reasons for this aren’t nefarious. He will make more money as a college graduate; he will have a lower unemployment rate as a college graduate; and his general prospects for marriage, mental health, and the chance to retire are greatly improved by college. College has been, and continues to be, a great benefit — just like the public primary and secondary schools — for these reasons. But he is also unaware that he is about to enter a world that is even more slanted against tradition and conservatism than his usually left-leaning public school teachers, where conservatives are outnumbered nationally by a ratio of only 6 to 1.
According to the 2016 Voter Study Group, approximately 52% of Americans are conservatives. Forty-eight percent are liberals. That’s what America thinks like. Our young high school pupil grows up being raised by these people, going to church with these people, playing sports with these people, and being in community with these people — the truly diverse America.
Then he goes to college, and he enters an entirely different world. The ideology is no longer split almost fifty-fifty, as it is in the real America. Instead, he enters the seminary, a place populated by a sort of priesthood (the professors), whose members teach the religion of Progressive Liberalism — through the content of the courses, through the arguments of the lectures they give, and through the host of campus-sponsored events the university puts on. Looking at the politics of the university professoriate, it’s hard not to make the connection.
In 2018, the National Association of Scholars published a study by Mitchell Langbert, an assistant professor at Brooklyn College. The study looked at the political affiliations at 51 of the 66 highest ranked liberal arts colleges and 8,688 of the professors they employ. His study found that, in aggregate, Democrats outnumber Republicans by a margin of nearly 13 to 1. That’s quite the change for our young 19-year-old who just got out of the Liberal Sunday School (the public K–12 schools) where Republicans were outnumbered by only 4 to 1. Broken down into different majors, the numbers are even more pronounced. In the anthropology and communications majors, Langbert found 164 Democrat professors and not one Republican at these universities. In religion, Democratic professors outnumber Republicans by a margin of 70 to 1. These professors are often the ones consulted by the media and used in the documentaries your kids watch about religion in the public schools. In the philosophy department, Democrats outnumber Republicans almost 18:1; many of these graduates go on to careers in law and make the laws decades later, which almost always fall hardest on the practitioners of traditional religious faith.
The priests and priestesses who teach in the Progressive seminary put their money as well as their mouths where their hearts and minds lie. According to Open Secrets, “political donations from the education industry largely come from individuals associated with various institutions, such as universities[.] … They’ve typically favored liberals; over the past decade, the worst year for Democrats was a cycle in which their party received 73 percent of the cash.” In 2018, those working in education gave $9.1 million to Republicans while donating $72.3 million to Democrats — just over 88% of their total contributions. This probably tells us that not only are Republicans far outnumbered by Democrats, but they are also outnumbered in enthusiasm — if we assume that actually giving your hard earned cash is a measure of active belief and support.
What’s happening isn’t education; it’s indoctrination. It’s not necessarily a conspiracy, and I suppose more often than not it’s not always even malevolent. But it doesn’t change the deleterious effects of hearing only one side persuasively argued. For a student majoring in anthropology or communications at one of these elite universities, it is possible to go four whole years without encountering a single Republican professor. Elaborating on the study, we know from it that “despite the variability, none of the 51 colleges had more Republicans than Democrats. According to the survey, over a third of them had no Republicans at all.”
Will this student know traditionalist or conservative counter-arguments? Will this student feel comfortable challenging his professors? Indeed, will actual conservatives getting their doctorates be themselves? They know for a fact that they are outnumbered greatly. They know how competitive it is to get a tenure-track professorship. Will they really speak their minds in the cutthroat realm of the university in the name of academic integrity? Surely, pusillanimity on the part of conservatives is rewarded when you are outnumbered 13 to 1…
Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: indoctrination, Progressive Liberalism, University System | Leave a Comment »