Destroying, suppressing evidence is FBI standard procedure | TheHill
Posted by M. C. on January 24, 2018
Let’s not forget another FIB special touch:
the famous “suicide letter” from the FBI to Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
The FBI-issued cell phone of Peter Strzok, whose previous texts to his mistress (also an FBI employee) showed fierce hostility to Trump, suddenly had problems due to “software upgrades” and other issues — and voila — all the messages between the two from Dec. 14, 2016, to May 17, 2017 vanished. Strzok, who oversaw the Trump investigation from its start in July 2016, was removed from Mueller’s Special Counsel investigation last summer after the Justice Department Inspector General discovered his anti-Trump texts….
Conservatives are caterwauling about the vanished evidence but this type of tactic has long been standard procedure for the FBI. Acting FBI chief Patrick Gray was forced to resign in 1973 after it was revealed that he had burned incriminating evidence from the White House in his fireplace shortly after the Watergate break-in by Nixon White House “plumbers.” Gray claimed he was resigning to preserve the “reputation and integrity” of the FBI — but that hasn’t worked out so well.
The FBI has a long history of “losing” evidence that would tarnish its halo. And for most of the agency’s history, judges and Congress have let the FBI sweep its dirt under the rug.
In the Ruby Ridge case,…
The FBI suppressed mounds of evidence regarding its final assault on the Branch Davidians in Waco…
FBI evidence shenanigans destroyed the prosecution of Cliven Bundy…
Evidence disposal is no problem for politically-favored targets of FBI investigation. A month before the 2016 election, Americans learned that the FBI agreed to destroy the laptops of top Hillary Clinton aides…
Will the FBI face any consequences for its latest lost evidence debacle?…
Be seeing you

Rate this:
Share this:
Related
This entry was posted on January 24, 2018 at 9:14 am and is filed under Uncategorized. Tagged: Destroying evidence, FBI, Peter Strzok, standard procedure, suppressing evidence. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


Leave a comment