MCViewPoint

Opinion from a Libertarian ViewPoint

Jon Rappoport’s Blog Dangerous nano-particles contaminating many vaccines: groundbreaking study

Posted by M. C. on June 4, 2020

But they can also be carried by the blood circulation,
escaping any attempt to guess what will be their final destination

The vaccine establishment does not show the slightest interest in
answering any of these questions. They are busy pretending the
questions don’t exist.

Trusting the establishment would be suicidal.

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/

by Jon Rappoport

“The Lung,” Second Edition, 2014: “Nanoparticles [are] comparable in
size to subcellular structures…enabling their ready incorporation into
biological systems.”

A 2017 study of 44 types of 15 traditional vaccines, manufactured by
leading global companies, has uncovered a very troubling and previously
unreported fact:

The vaccines are heavily contaminated with a variety of nanoparticles.

Many of the particles are metals.

We’re talking about traditional vaccines, such as HPV, flu, Swine Flu, Hepatitis B, MMR, DPT, tetanus, etc.

To begin to understand some of the destructive effects of
contaminating nanoparticles in vaccines, here is the groundbreaking 2017
study:

International Journal of Vaccines & Vaccination

Volume 4 Issue 1

January 23 2017

New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines:

Micro- and Nanocontamination

Antonietta M Gatti and Stefano Montanari
https://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/new-quality-control-investigations-on-vaccines-micro–and-nanocontamination.html

“The analyses carried out show that in all samples checked vaccines
contain non biocompatible and bio-persistent foreign bodies which are
not declared by the Producers, against which the body reacts in any
case. This new investigation represents a new quality control that can
be adopted to assess the safety of a vaccine. Our hypothesis is that
this contamination is unintentional, since it is probably due to
polluted components or procedures of industrial processes (e.g.
filtrations) used to produce vaccines…”

Are the study authors leaving the door open to the possibility that the contamination is intentional?

“The quantity of foreign bodies detected and, in some cases, their
unusual chemical compositions baffled us. The inorganic particles
identified are neither biocompatible nor biodegradable, that means that
they are biopersistent and can induce effects that can become evident
either immediately close to injection time or after a certain time from
administration. It is important to remember that particles (crystals and
not molecules) are bodies foreign to the organism and they behave as
such. More in particular, their toxicity is in some respects different
from that of the chemical elements composing them, adding to that
toxicity…they induce an inflammatory reaction.”

“After being injected, those microparticles, nanoparticles and
aggregates can stay around the injection site forming swellings and
granulomas…But they can also be carried by the blood circulation,
escaping any attempt to guess what will be their final destination…As
happens with all foreign bodies, particularly that small, they induce an
inflammatory reaction that is chronic because most of those particles
cannot be degraded. Furthermore, the protein-corona effect…due to a
nano-bio-interaction…can produce organic/inorganic composite particles
capable of stimulating the immune system in an undesirable way…It is
impossible not to add that particles the size often observed in vaccines
can enter cell nuclei and interact with the DNA…”

“In some cases, e.g. as occurs with Iron and some Iron alloys, they
can corrode and the corrosion products exert a toxicity affecting the
tissues…”

“Given the contaminations we observed in all samples of human-use
vaccines, adverse effects after the injection of those vaccines are
possible and credible and have the character of randomness, since they
depend on where the contaminants are carried by the blood circulation.
It is only obvious that similar quantities of these foreign bodies can
have a more serious impact on very small organisms like those of
children. Their presence in the muscles…could heavily impair the muscle
functionality…”

“We come across particles with chemical compositions, similar to
those found in the vaccines we analyzed, when we study cases of
environmental contamination caused by different pollution sources. In
most circumstances, the combinations detected are very odd as they have
no technical use, cannot be found in any material handbook and look like
the result of the random formation occurring, for example, when waste
is burnt. In any case, whatever their origin, they should not be present
in any injectable medicament, let alone in vaccines, more in particular
those meant for infants.”

This 2017 study opens up a whole new field: the investigation of nanoparticles in vaccines where none were expected.

Such particles are not medicine in any sense of the word.

Many legal and scientific “experts” assert the State has a right to
mandate vaccines and force them on the population. But these
contaminating nanoparticles are not vaccines or medicines. Only a
lunatic would defend the right of the State to inject them.

Here is another section from the 2017 study. Trade names of
vaccines, and compositions of the nanoparticle contaminants are
indicated. Take a deep breath and buckle up:

“…further presence of micro-, sub-micro- and nanosized, inorganic,
foreign bodies (ranging from 100nm to about ten microns) was identified
in all cases [all 44 vaccines], whose presence was not declared in the
leaflets delivered in the package of the product…”

“…single particles, cluster of micro- and nanoparticles (less than
100nm) and aggregates…debris of Aluminum, Silicon, Magnesium and
Titanium; of Iron, Chromium, Silicon and Calcium particles…arranged in a
cluster, and Aluminum-Copper debris…in an aggregate.”

“…the particles are surrounded and embedded in a biological
substrate. In all the samples analyzed, we identified particles
containing: Lead (Typhym, Cervarix, Agrippal S1, Meningitec, Gardasil)
or stainless steel (Mencevax, Infarix Hexa, Cervarix. Anatetall,
Focetria, Agrippal S1, Menveo, Prevenar 13, Meningitec, Vaxigrip,
Stamaril Pasteur, Repevax and MMRvaxPro).”

“…particles of Tungsten identified in drops of Prevenar and Infarix (Aluminum, Tungsten, Calcium chloride).”

“…singular debris found in Repevax (Silicon, Gold, Silver) and Gardasil (Zirconium).”

“Some metallic particles made of Tungsten or stainless steel were
also identified. Other particles containing Zirconium, Hafnium,
Strontium and Aluminum (Vivotif, Meningetec); Tungsten, Nickel, Iron
(Priorix, Meningetec); Antimony (Menjugate kit); Chromium (Meningetec);
Gold or Gold, Zinc (Infarix Hexa, Repevax), or Platinum, Silver,
Bismuth, Iron, Chromium (MMRvaxPro) or Lead,Bismuth (Gardasil) or Cerium
(Agrippal S1) were also found. The only Tungsten appears in 8/44
vaccines, while Chromium (alone or in alloy with Iron and Nickel) in
25/44. The investigations revealed that some particles are embedded in a
biological substrate, probably proteins, endo-toxins and residues of
bacteria. As soon as a particle comes in contact with proteic fluids, a
nano-bio-interaction…occurs and a ‘protein corona’ is formed…The
nano-bio-interaction generates a bigger-sized compound that is not
biodegradable and can induce adverse effects, since it is not recognized
as self by the body.”

“…examples of these nano-bio-interactions. Aggregates can be seen
(stable composite entities) containing particles of Lead in Meningitec…
of stainless steel (Iron, Chromium and Nickel…) and of Copper, Zinc and
Lead in Cervarix…Similar aggregates, though in different situations
(patients suffering from leukemia or cryoglobulinemia), have already
been described in literature.”

I’m sure you’ve read official assurances that vaccine-manufacturing
problems are “rare.” You can file those pronouncements along with other
medical lies.

“I’d like the heavy metal sandwich on rye, please. And instead of serving it on a plate, can you inject it?”

Several vital questions demanding answers spring from the findings of this 2017 study:

Are some of these nanoparticles intentionally placed in vaccines?

Does the standard manufacturing process for traditional vaccines
INEVITABLY lead to dangerous and destructive nano-contamination?

New nano-technology is already being employed to create several
vaccines—supposedly “improving effectiveness.” In fact, the coming
COVID-19 vaccine may be a nano-type. Does this manufacturing process
carry with it the unavoidable effect of unleashing a hurricane of
nanoparticle contaminants?

How many cases of childhood brain damage and autism can be laid at the door of nanoparticle contamination?

And finally, where are these contaminated vaccines manufactured? The
above study did not attempt to discover this. It was outside the scope
of the research. It’s common knowledge that, for example, in the case
of the US, vaccines or their components, are, in many instances, not
produced domestically. Where does this put control of safety? In, say,
China, where there have been numerous pharmaceutical scandals connected
to contamination of products?

The vaccine establishment does not show the slightest interest in
answering any of these questions. They are busy pretending the
questions don’t exist.

Trusting the establishment would be suicidal.

Be seeing you

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: