MCViewPoint

Opinion from a Libertarian ViewPoint

Ryan McMaken: The Only Type of Democracy that Actually Works

Posted by M. C. on August 26, 2024

The Daily Bell

Summary

A functioning democracy requires the protection of individual freedom, minority rights, and private property rights, and can only be achieved through mechanisms such as unlimited secession, voluntary grouping, and exit options, rather than relying solely on majority rule.

  • What if we are going to use the term democracy is there any sort of democracy that works we all know that there’s big problems with majoritarian rule.
  • Mises offers a unique vision on what democracy means, which is different from the common understanding of the term.
  • Mises’s vision of democracy is based on the principle of unlimited secession, allowing minority groups to break off and form their own majority.
  • For Mises, the key feature of his view of democracy is the right of exit, which prevents any real monopoly power from forming.
  • If democracy means self-determination, then it’s a vibrant and constantly changing political group, where a permanent minority group should have the right to leave.
  • The threat of unlimited secession and voluntary membership is what assures that a government will protect private property rights, according to Mises.
  • A workable and reasonable view of democracy can be achieved by combining the nationality principle with Mises’s vision for secession and self-determination.

Here are the 3 categories to sort the insights:

  • He critiques majority rule, saying it’s very dangerous in diverse societies with different linguistic groups, ethnic groups, and interests.
  • Even with full citizenship rights on paper, a minority group can still be treated as second-class citizens and be politically disenfranchised if they are consistently outvoted by the majority.
  • According to Mises, a system where a permanent minority group has no political power and can be endlessly exploited by the majority group cannot preserve private property rights.
  • He recognized that a large ethnic group becoming the majority could erase the rights of the minority ethnic native-born group, leading to significant political disruption, possibly even war or Civil War.

Critique of Traditional Democracy

  • The answer to dealing with inequality between majority and minority groups is secession, the ability to exit and found your own state.
  • Democracy without the right of self-determination is unacceptable and can impose its laws and agenda on the entire population.
  • The practical reality of widespread exit and the ability to escape oppressive regimes created a situation where private property rights were highly respected.

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

“But you can’t use a gun for self-protection in Canada… that’s not a right that you have…”

Posted by M. C. on August 26, 2024

Police overwhelmed…
Criminals have more rights than you do…
Violent offenders routinely released…
Average hold times for 9/11 in the GTA is 6 – 12 minutes…
Best case response times for a “Tier 1” emergency in Toronto… 17-22 minutes.
The criminals have guns “and they are loaded”…

But you cannot use a gun for self-protection in Canada. “That’s not a right you have” 

The Daily Bell

I didn’t open the FB video. I didn’t want to add to my FB dossier.

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Voting Explained

Posted by M. C. on August 24, 2024

Caitlin Johnstone

https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/p/voting-explained

Prisoners: Hey, let us out of this prison! We didn’t do anything wrong!

Prison guard: Oh my god, you think you’re in prison?? You’re all free! You can leave whenever you want!

Prisoners: Okay well let us out then!

Prison guard: Sure thing! There are some keys hanging up next to the door. Should be a red one and a blue one.

[Long pause]

Prisoners: This key isn’t working! It’s made of plastic and it’s completely the wrong size. It’s clearly not designed to open this lock.

Prison guard: Which key did you try?

Prisoners: The red one.

Prison guard: Ohh, that must be the wrong one. Try the blue one.

[Long pause]

Prisoners: The blue key doesn’t work either! It’s also a fake plastic toy that isn’t built for this lock, just like the red one!

Prison guard: You must not be doing it right. You’ve got to try harder. Really jam them in there and wiggle them around a bit.

[Very long pause]

Prisoners: It’s not working!

Prison guard: Try harder!

Prisoners: We’ve been trying as hard as we can! We keep switching back and forth between the red key and the blue key and trying every different approach we can think of, and we’ve come nowhere close! These plastic keys are just fake children’s toys designed to distract us and keep us preoccupied so we’ll stay locked up! Give us the real keys!

Prison guard [sighs]: Okay, well, we don’t like to encourage this, but there is a third key handing on the wall to your left.

Prisoners: This giant green one?

Prison guard: That’s the one!

Prisoners: This thing’s four feet long and made of styrofoam! There’s not a chance in hell it can open that lock!

Prison guard: Okay well maybe just stick with the red and blue ones then.

Prisoner 1: I say we try the blue one!

Prisoner 2: Idiot! The red one is way better!

Prisoner 1: Blue one!

Prisoner 2: Red one!

Prisoner 1: Okay, well, let’s ask everyone here. Everyone who thinks we should keep trying the blue one come over here onto this side of the prison, and everyone who thinks we should try the red one go over there with him.

Prisoner 3: Uhh, guys? That door doesn’t look very thick. There are a whole lot of us, and there’s only one prison guard. I’m pretty sure if we all team up we could knock this door down and tie him up.

Prisoner 1: What are you, nuts??

Prisoner 2: Why go to all that trouble when we’ve got this perfectly good red key right here?

Prisoner 1: Blue key!

Prisoner 2: Red key!

Prisoner 1: Blue Key!

Prisoner 2: Red key!

Prison guard [leaning back and chuckling]: Gets ’em every time.

________________

Caitlin’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Ditch SMS! How to convince your friends

Posted by M. C. on August 23, 2024

Most of our conversations are digital, and our privacy hinges on our ability to convince others to use a private messaging platform. Getting friends and family to switch isn’t easy though! Here are some strategies you can try, ranging from educational methods, to downright sneakiness!

Ditch the megaphone, use Signal.

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Thomas Sowell / Walter E. Williams on Congresspersons

Posted by M. C. on August 23, 2024

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

“Boeing LIED! NASA Finally Revealed What Exactly Happened with Boeing Starliner”

Posted by M. C. on August 23, 2024

TECH MAP

A “Jobs Program”. Boeing has a 1.6 $billion loss since 2016. Boeing’s loss or ours?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

The Taiwan Problem You (Probably) Don’t Know

Posted by M. C. on August 21, 2024

The foolish insistence of FDR that Taiwan be granted to Chiang’s crumbling ROC regime, then Harry Truman and Dwight Eisenhower’s determination to keep that regime in power, played an obviously critical role in creating the circumstances that prevail to the present day: a Chinese Civil War never concluded.

https://libertarianinstitute.org/articles/the-taiwan-problem-you-probably-dont-know/

by Joseph Solis-Mullen

chiang ching kuo and chiang kai shek 83b330

Taiwan is today lauded for its vibrant democracy, open economy, and progressive society. However, behind this shining exterior is a dark and brutal history that is frequently overlooked; or in the case of Washington and its loyal corporate mouthpieces, purposefully ignored.

For before its democratization in the 1990s, Taiwan was a harsh authoritarian police state under the rule of Chiang Kai-shek and his son Chiang Ching-kuo. This period, marked by severe repression and systemic terror, is an essential chapter in Taiwan’s history that Americans should know, particularly given the enduring resentment Washington’s vital support for the regime engendered and the purported reasons for the necessity of the island’s defense.

The roots of Taiwan’s authoritarianism can be traced back to the retreat of Chiang Kai-shek’s Nationalist government (Kuomintang, or KMT) to Taiwan after losing the Chinese Civil War to the Communists in 1949. The local population had already received more than an inkling of what awaited, the KMT authorities having already in 1947 brutally suppressed a popular protest against KMT corruption, mistreatment, and misrule on the island. Facing a precarious situation and the ever-looming threat of a Communist invasion, once arrived on the island Chiang established a regime that relied heavily on surveillance, repression, and brutality to maintain control.

Central to this regime was the role of Chiang Ching-kuo, Chiang Kai-shek’s son, who was instrumental in the creation and operation of Taiwan’s police state. Having spent formative years in Stalin’s Moscow, Chiang Ching-kuo learned from the Soviet Union’s tactics of surveillance, infiltration, and terror. Upon his return, he applied these methods to serve his father’s regime, becoming a formidable spy chief whose skills ensured the perpetuation of KMT rule in Taiwan.

Chiang Ching-kuo’s police force penetrated almost every facet of life in Taiwan. Officially, their task was to arrest enemies of the state, countering Communist subversion; in practice, this mission translated into the suppression of virtually any source of potential dissent, contributing to what became known as the White Terror.

See the rest here

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

9th Circuit: Feds Free to Censor ‘Anti-Vaccine’ ‘Misinformation’ Via Pressure on Social Media Companies

Posted by M. C. on August 21, 2024

What a wild coincidence: one branch of government (judiciary) doesn’t mind another branch of government (executive) doing whatever it likes extraconstitutionally.

That’s called Democracy™, boys and girls, and it’s sacred.

The Daily Bell

By Ben Bartee –

Originally published via Armageddon Prose:

What a wild coincidence: one branch of government (judiciary) doesn’t mind another branch of government (executive) doing whatever it likes extraconstitutionally.

That’s called Democracy™, boys and girls, and it’s sacred.

Via Reuters (emphasis added):

Meta Platforms defeated an appeal by Children’s Health Defense, an anti-vaccine group founded by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., challenging its censorship of Facebook posts that spread misinformation about vaccines’ efficacy and safety.

In a decision on Friday, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Pasadena, California, said the nonprofit did not show that Meta worked with or was coerced by federal officials to suppress views challenging “government orthodoxy” on vaccines.

Children’s Health Defense sued in 2020, saying that Meta had violated its constitutional rights by flagging “vaccine misinformation” as false, and taking away its right to advertise on Facebook.”

Not being a legal scholar, I’m sure there’s a good answer to this, but I’m not clear: why would CHD sue Meta and not the government for violating its First Amendment rights, when it was at the government’s behest that Meta acted?

Via Children’s Health Defense (emphasis added):

CHD’s suit accused the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and other federal agencies of “privatizing” the First Amendment by teaming up with Facebook to censor speech which, “under the Bill of Rights, the Government cannot censor.”

According to the lawsuit, filed in August 2020 — and amended in December 2020 — the CDC and the World Health Organization “collaborated closely with Facebook to suppress vaccine safety speech by using a ‘warning label’ and other similar types of notices which, while purporting to flag misinformation, in reality censor valid and truthful speech, including content posted by plaintiff on its Facebook page regarding vaccines.”

This collaboration amounted to “state action” and was in violation of the First Amendment, CHD said

See the rest here

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Neil deGrasse is ABSOLUTELY wrong about this

Posted by M. C. on August 20, 2024

Thomas SowellTV

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

The Frogs Will Boil Themselves

Posted by M. C. on August 20, 2024

by Jeff Thomas

If this does occur, the public will, in effect, “boil themselves.” They will have demanded that the Government act, and, when the dust has settled, each side will claim some sort of victory but will fail to understand that they have brought about their own loss of rights.

It is hoped that, when the day comes that a Constitutional Review is proposed, Americans refuse to take the bait.

There’s a well-known old fable that describes a frog being boiled alive. It states that if a frog is dropped in boiling water, it will hop out. But if it’s placed in lukewarm water, it will be comfortable. Then, if the heat is turned up slowly, it will not perceive the danger and will be boiled to death.

In political terms, this translates into a slow increase, say, the slow rise of taxation or the gradual removal of freedoms.

But there’s another way to boil the electorate of a country: have them become willing participants in their own demise.

This method is a common practice in many countries, particularly the US. Americans have repeatedly been conned into begging for their second amendment rights to be diminished.

The method is to make use of the media to shine a light on the horrific murder of innocents through the use of firearms.

In recent years, this effort has been ramped up through regular senseless massacres of people, particularly children, in public places, such as schools and movie theatres.

Whether or not these incidents are actually created by the ruling elite is a moot point. What matters is that their proliferation has been extremely effective in providing the media will the fodder to repeatedly ask, “When is the Government going to make the possession of guns illegal so that the killing will stop?”

Many citizens are wary of such suggestions, but countless others quickly take the bait and demand that the Government “do something.”

Eventually, this becomes a point of pride for many citizens — a badge of righteousness — for standing up for those who have been victims.

Through such efforts, the US constitution has slowly lost its ability to serve as a limitation to Government power. A proliferation of laws that redefine what the Constitution means has, over time, eviscerated the Constitution.

Not surprisingly, those who support this effort are largely liberal, which creates a backlash from those who are conservative and vehemently oppose any erosion of the Constitution.

Those who are liberal may reinforce their beliefs by watching propaganda networks on television and regularly pump up the dangers of the Constitution. Likewise, conservatives have their propaganda network, which can be counted on to reinforce their views.

Whichever side Americans take on such issues, they would be wise to keep an eye out for what may be the next development in this wrangle.

See the rest here

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »