MCViewPoint

Opinion from a Libertarian ViewPoint

Posts Tagged ‘Internet’

This is the moment the internet changed forever

Posted by M. C. on September 17, 2025

Keep your driver license handy. You may have to present it to get permission to use the ‘net.

Thank your government

Naomi Brockwell TV

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

The Internet Is a Manipulation Machine

Posted by M. C. on September 16, 2025

Platforms have one overriding goal: to keep us online as long as possible. And they’ve learned that nothing hooks us like outrage. If they can rile us up, we’ll stay, scroll, and click.

For example, in Google’s RTB system, what’s going on behind the scenes in that split second is Google is announcing to their list of Authorized Buyers, who are the bidders plugged into Google’s ad exchange:

“Hey, this person just opened up her webpage, here’s everything we know about her. She has red hair. She rants a lot about privacy. She likes cats. Here’s her device, location, browsing history, and this is her inferred mood. Who wants to bid to put an ad in front of her?”

Be careful you’re not playing an avatar in someone else’s propaganda war.

https://nbtv.substack.com/p/our-polarized-world

We’re more polarized than ever. Conversations have turned into shouting matches. Opposing ideas feel like threats, not something to debate.

But here’s something many people don’t realize: privacy and surveillance have everything to do with it. Most people never connect those dots.

Why Surveillance Is the Key to Polarization

Surveillance is the engine that makes platform-driven polarization work.

Platforms have one overriding goal: to keep us online as long as possible. And they’ve learned that nothing hooks us like outrage. If they can rile us up, we’ll stay, scroll, and click.

Outrage drives engagement. Engagement drives profit. But when outrage becomes the currency of the system, polarization is the natural byproduct. The more the platforms know about us, the easier it is to feed us the content that will push our buttons, confirm our biases, and keep us in a cycle of anger. And that anger doesn’t just keep us scrolling, it also pushes us further apart.

These platforms are not neutral spaces, they are giant marketplaces where influence is bought and sold. Every scroll, every feed, every “recommended” post is shaped by algorithms built to maximize engagement and auction off your attention. And it’s not just companies pushing shoes or handbags. It’s political groups paying to shift your vote. It’s movements paying to make you hate certain people because you think they hate you. It’s hostile governments paying to fracture our society.

Because our lives are so transparent to the surveillance machine, we’re more susceptible to manipulation than ever. Polarization isn’t cultural drift. When surveillance becomes the operating system of the internet, polarization and manipulation are the natural consequences.

The Internet Is a Manipulation Machine

Few people are really aware of how much manipulation there is online. We all fancy ourselves to be independent thinkers. We like to think we make up our own mind about things. That we choose for ourselves which videos to watch next. That we discover interesting articles all on our own.

We want to believe we’re in control. But in a system where people are constantly paying to influence us, that independence is hard to defend. The truth is, our autonomy is far more fragile than we’d like to admit.

This influence creeps into our entire online experience.

Every time you load a web page, you’ll notice that the text appears first, alongside empty white boxes, and there’s a split second before those boxes are filled up. What’s going on in that split second is an auction, as part of what’s called a real-time bidding (RTB) system.

For example, in Google’s RTB system, what’s going on behind the scenes in that split second is Google is announcing to their list of Authorized Buyers, who are the bidders plugged into Google’s ad exchange:

“Hey, this person just opened up her webpage, here’s everything we know about her. She has red hair. She rants a lot about privacy. She likes cats. Here’s her device, location, browsing history, and this is her inferred mood. Who wants to bid to put an ad in front of her?”

These authorized buyers have milliseconds to decide whether to bid and how much.

This “firehose of data” is sprayed at potentially thousands of entities. And the number of data points included can be staggering. Google knows a LOT about you. Only one buyer wins the ad slot and pays, but potentially thousands will get access to that data.

Google doesn’t make their Authorized Buyers list public, but they do publish a list of Certified External Vendors list, which is a public-facing list of vendors like demand-side platforms, ad servers, analytics providers, etc. that Google has certified to interact with their ad systems. This CEV list is the closest proxy the public gets to knowing who is involved in this real-time bidding system.

And if you scroll through the names of some of these vendors, you won’t even find a Wikipedia page for many of them. A huge number have scrubbed themselves from the internet. It’s a mix of ad companies, data brokers, even government shell companies. And many of them you can bet are just sitting quietly in these auctions so they can scrape this data, to share or sell elsewhere, or use for other purposes. Regardless of what Google’s own Terms of Service say, once this data leaves Google’s hands, they have no control.

This real-time bidding system is just one behind-the-scenes mechanisms of the influence economy. But this machinery of influence is everywhere, not just when you load a webpage.

When you go to watch a video, there are thumbnails next to the video suggesting what you should watch next, and you click on one if it looks interesting. Those video thumbnails were not accidental.

When you scroll a social media timeline, the posts that populate are intentional. Everywhere you go, you’re seeing things that people have paid to put in front of you, hoping to nudge you one way or another. Even search results, which feel like neutral gateways to information, are arranged according to what someone else wants you to see.

This system of manipulation isn’t limited to simple commercial influence, where companies just want to get us to buy a new pair of shoes.

There are faceless entities paying to shape our thoughts, shift our behavior, and sway our votes. They work to bend our worldview, to manipulate our emotions, even to make us hate other people by convincing us those people hate us.

Where Privacy Comes In

This is where privacy comes into play.

The more a company or government knows about us, the easier it is to manipulate us.

  • If we allow every email to be scanned and analyzed, every message to be read, every like, scroll, and post to be fed into a profile about us…
  • If companies scrape every browser click, every book we read, every piece of music we listen to, every film we watch…
  • When faceless entities know everywhere we go, whom we meet, what we do, and then they trace who those people meet, where they go, and what they do, and our entire social graph is mapped…

In this current reality, the surveillance industrial complex knows us better than we know ourselves, and it becomes easy to figure out exactly what will make us click.

“Oh, Naomi is sad today. She’ll be more susceptible to this kind of messaging. Push it to her now.”

Profiles aren’t just about facts. They’re about state of mind. If the system can see that you’re tired, lonely, or angry, it knows exactly when to time the nudge.

NBTV is funded entirely by community support. Consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Upgrade to paid

Who Are the Players?

This isn’t just about platforms experimenting with outrage to keep us online. Entire government departments now study these manipulation strategies. When something goes viral, they try to trace where it started: “Was it seeded by a hostile nation, a domestic political shop, or a corporation laying the groundwork for its next rent-seeking scheme?”

Everyone with resources uses these tools. Governments, parties, corporations, activist networks. The mechanism is the same, and the targets are us.

The entire internet runs on a system where people are competing for our attention, and some of the agendas of those involved are downright nefarious.

These systems don’t just predict what we like and hate, they actively shape it, and we have to start realizing that sometimes division itself is the intended outcome.

Filter Bubbles Were Only the Beginning

For years, the filter bubble was the go-to explanation for polarization. Algorithms showed us more of what we already agreed with, so we became trapped in echo chambers. We assumed polarization was just the natural consequence of people living in separate informational worlds.

But that story is only half right, and dangerously incomplete.

The real problem isn’t just that we see different things.
It’s that we are being deliberately targeted.

Governments, corporations, and movements know so much about us that they can do more than keep us in bubbles. They can reach inside those bubbles to provoke us, push us, and agitate us.

Filter bubbles were about limiting information. Surveillance-driven targeting is about exploiting information. With enough data, platforms and their partners can predict what will outrage you, when you’re most vulnerable, and which message will make you react.

And that’s the crucial shift. Polarization today isn’t just a byproduct of passive algorithms. It’s the direct result of an influence machine that knows us better than we know ourselves, and uses that knowledge to bend us toward someone else’s agenda.

Fakes, Fragments, and Manufactured Consensus

We live in a world of deepfakes.

We live in a world of soundbites taken out of context.

We live in an era where it’s easier than ever to generate AI fluff. If someone wants to make a point of view seem popular, they can instantly create thousands of websites, all parroting the same slightly tweaked narrative. When we go searching for information, it looks like everyone is in consensus.

Volume now looks like truth, and repetition now looks like proof. And both are cheap.

Remember Your Humanity

In this era of artificial interactions, manipulation, and engineered outrage, we can’t forget our humanity.

That person that you’re fighting with might not actually be a human, they might be a bot.

That story about that political candidate might have been taken completely out of context, and deliberately targeted at you to make you angry.

Online, we dehumanize each other. But we should instead remember how to talk. Ideas can be discussed without becoming triggers. They don’t have to send us spiraling after four hours of doomscrolling.

Fear is the mindkiller. When something online pushes you to react, pause. Ask whose agenda this serves. Ask what context you might be missing.

The Path Forward

We are more polarized than ever, largely because we’ve become so transparent to those who profit from using our emotions against us.

Privacy is our ally in this fight. The less companies and governments know about us, the harder it is for them to manipulate us. Privacy protects our autonomy in the digital age.

And we need to see each other as humans first, not as avatars in someone else’s propaganda war. The person you’re arguing with was probably targeted by a completely opposite campaign.

We’ll all be better off if we lift the veil on this manipulation, and remember that we are independent thinkers with the power to make up our own minds, instead of being led by those who want to control us.

Yours in Privacy,
Naomi

Consider supporting our nonprofit so that we can fund more research into the surveillance baked into our everyday tech. We want to educate as many people as possible about what’s going on, and help write a better future. Visit LudlowInstitute.org/donate to set up a monthly, tax-deductible donation.

Donate

NBTV. Because Privacy Matters.

Support NBTV and look awesome at the same time! Visit our merch store at Shop.NBTV.media

You’re currently a free subscriber to NBTV Newsletter. To support our free content, consider upgrading your subscription!

Upgrade to paid

 
Share 
 
LikeCommentRestack
 

© 2025 Ludlow Institute
1 Brickyard Sq, Suite 14, #134, Epping NH 03042

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Will the Internet as We Know It Disappear in the Next Year?

Posted by M. C. on November 6, 2023

A banking 9/11 false flag. Is Mercola another Alex Jones?

I think Whitney Webb is credible.

Back to using cash yet?

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/11/joseph-mercola/will-the-internet-as-we-know-it-disappear-in-the-next-year/

By Dr. Joseph Mercola

Mercola.com

In my mind Whitney Webb is one of the best investigative journalists on the web and does meticulous research on the topics she focuses on. In the video above, Marty Bent of the TFTC Bitcoin podcast interviews her about how the central bankers plan to use artificial intelligence (AI) to control the lives of everyone on earth.

This is one of the most shocking and concerning interviews I have heard in a long time as it has a dismal prediction as to how it is likely we may have only a year at best and maybe half a year to enjoy the internet as we know it now. Even though it is heavily censored it is still usable. This basic functionality may disappear if her predictions are accurate.

If that is the case, you will not have access to this site or the daily newsletters we provide and all the updates we will issue if this scenario happens. So, to guard against this scenario, I would suggest making sure you sign up to receive messages by texts on your cell phone.

You Need to Connect With Us on Mobile in Case Internet Is Gone

As Whitney explains in her interview above, it is likely that in the next year there will be a false flag cyberattack on the banks similar to 9/11. They will then use this attack to shut down the internet and implement a draconian Cyber Patriot Act.

We have no idea of how long the internet will be down, but it could be weeks or longer. We will be unable to provide you with important updates if this happens and we only have your email. That is why I am urging you to please sign up in the form below so we can connect with you by messaging your phone. (U.S. phone numbers only.)

Divide and Conquer

As noted by Webb, the string-pullers always seek to divide people using emotional appeals, and this situation is a classic case of that. Are you with Hamas, or with the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF)? It’s a false choice. The side we should be on is the side of innocent civilians, regardless of where they live. “We should just step off the chessboard and stop playing their game,” she says.

Indeed, only by being against war will we stand against the correct enemy because, ultimately, most if not all wars are fought for the benefit of central bankers and their globalist allies, not for the benefit of nations, humanitarian or democratic causes. As noted by Webb:

“Half the population of Gaza are children under the age of 18 [i.e., below voting age and did not vote Hamas into power], so promoting the carpet bombing of that [area] and the refusal to let humanitarian aid in … there’s no celebrating that.”

Webb also points out there’s virtually no chance the Israeli forces did not see the October 7, 2023, attack coming. “It’s just absurd that they wouldn’t have been able to know that was going to happen in advance,” Webb says, “and there are IDF veterans and Israelis that definitely are no friends of Palestine or Hamas that are saying that’s the case.”

‘Israel’s 9/11’

Israel referring to that attack as “Israel’s 9/11” could be another tipoff.

“If you’re familiar with the realities of 9/11, there’s only a few possibilities there. Either it was intentionally done by intelligence agencies, or it was allowed to happen by intelligence agencies,” Webb says.

“So, I think we can assume that similar possibilities may have happened here with Israel, because before all of this happened, Netanyahu was facing major issues domestically, a huge amount of protests against him, major efforts to remove him from power.”

As noted by Bent, 9/11 ushered in the Patriot Act (which had clearly been written and was waiting in the wings for just the right moment) that “led to the dystopian hellscape that we’re currently living in, and it’s just mindboggling that people can’t [recognize] the pattern … It’s the same playbook all over again.”

Indeed, the similarities are striking. The main difference is that we now have hindsight we didn’t have in 2001. Today, the ramifications of the Patriot Act have become clear, and as The Great Reset agenda moves forward, we can see how important the implementation of the Patriot Act was to that agenda.

During the COVID pandemic, the globalist cabal began to reveal its true intentions like never before. Many of the players ceased to even pretend that it’s about anything other than the subjugation of the masses.

Since we now know the aim of the globalists is to enslave humanity within a technocratic, transhumanist dystopia where everything we say and do is known by the government and can be used against us, we ought to be very wary about encouraging a war that can then be used to justify a global kind of Patriot Act.

Coming Soon: Cyberattack on the Banks?

See the rest here

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Watch “Sony is CENSORING the INTERNET!” on YouTube

Posted by M. C. on April 5, 2023

The Internet has transformed the way we access knowledge, and its neutral infrastructure is supposed to be free from government influence or corporate censorship. But the internet as we know it is under threat. Sony music has brought a legal attack against a critical part of the Internet’s infrastructure — the DNS resolver. In this video we’ll explain why Sony is attacking critical infrastructure of the internet, why this is terrifying for the future of free online expression and access to information, and what you can do to help.

https://youtu.be/oSZYlU-cfzY

Hillary Clinton: “lack of gatekeepers” and “misinformation” online is clouding Biden’s accomplishments

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

The Internet Is Next

Posted by M. C. on March 24, 2022

The tyranny will only get worse until we actively innovate back toward liberty. It’s time to liberate the people from the propaganda, lies and social manipulation of these goons which has caused untold suffering in the past two years alone.

https://thegoodcitizen.substack.com/p/the-internet-is-next?s=r

The famous phrase about truth as the first casualty of war is everywhere these days if only because the people recognize the truth is often nowhere.

There are variations of this saying, and this one on populism is appropriate given the past decade of rising animosity to elites and global management.

Truth is not the first casualty of war alone: it is the first casualty of populism.
— Theodore Dalrymple

You’ve heard the term “if it’s free you are the product”? Well, that’s always been a quaint yet silly advertising slogan for our collective malaise with our digital world. The implication being if it’s free, you will be paying for it in may other ways that you cannot see. A more appropriate and honest slogan would be: “You are and always have been the target.” Your body, your mind, your mental state, your political beliefs, your private and public habits, your DNA (the past two years) and now your bank accounts and ideological and philanthropic associations are being targeted by western governments for lists, censorship, seizure and freezing out from participation in society unless you submit and obey, forever.

What’s happening in Canada will not stay in Canada. What’s happening in Russia will not stay in Russia. What’s happening in Czechia, The UK, Slovakia, Germany, Austria, France, Italy, New York Kindergartens will not stay there. Tyranny may have arrived with a bioweapon wrapped in a pandemic PR campaign and the pretense of a deadly threat, but it’s quickly mutating in virulence with a manufactured war designed to massage our lizard brains and pull our heart strings.

In order for tyranny to gain a permanent foothold across the west with future Silent War fronts against humanity, it will require total control over information so that events can be framed through manufactured narratives. Right now there are far too many leaks for the truth to escape and expose and undermine those prepared narratives. For tyranny to maneuver freely under benevolent disguises of safety and security it must have the consent of the people, which can only be artificially manufactured with lies and propaganda that are unvarnished by truth.

Our present digital model is one of social and civilizational rot which is why using the term ‘social media’ is a fallacy that should be substituted with ‘attention networks’. The organizing principals of our digital model of monopolized attentions networks is one that shadow governments and intel agencies adore and finance and partner with for new normal fascistic capitalism’s mass surveillance and censorship circus. The capitalism side of that equation no longer matters in a future of great resets and great narratives created by the gatekeepers of ‘stakeholder capitalism’, a controlled and engineered future of centralized technocratic power that must destroy the old models.

For years scholars have separated online mass surveillance from censorship, often ignoring the latter altogether. The two are linked. You cannot have censorship without first having mass surveillance in order to know what is forbidden, even if determined by artificial intelligence programmed by humans with little intelligence on the consequences of censorship. The role of official state censors has always been pervasive in the post printing press world to keep out information and ideas that were a threat to whatever centralized powers controlled the censors. We have only existed in a world without official censors for a very brief time, and were naïve to think given the structure of information creation and consumption today that it could last much longer. In fact, you could say it no longer exists at all. The official censors are back. Their resurrection happened in the algorithmic shadows, at first quietly, but now in a torrid rush playing out for all to see, or not see if they’re allowed to succeed.

A brief trip through time requires we see how we arrived at this present day model of information dissemination and consumption, (how we became targets) by visiting a recent book by George Gilder, Life After Google: The Fall of Big Data and Rise of the Blockchain Economy (2018), whose conclusion is going to need some updating given recent events in Russia, Czechia, Austria, Australia, Canada, ah hell I should just write ‘the world’.

Image
23 years of preparing for the destruction of liberty across the west. Censorship is good.

Information Systems
Over the course of three centuries Gilder traces the concept of ‘system of the world’; a set of ideas that “…pervade a society’s technology and institutions and inform its civilization. A system of the world necessarily combines science and commerce, religion and philosophy, economics and epistemology.” For nearly a millennia there was no system aside from ideas rooted in religion and superstition. The first ‘system’ with roots in today’s ‘information system’ can be observed in 17th century Newtonian discoveries.

Newtonian System

See the rest here

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | 1 Comment »

Rand Paul, Tulsi Gabbard, Thomas Massie, Ron Wyden Join Forces To Unplug the President’s ‘Internet Kill Switch’ – Reason.com

Posted by M. C. on September 29, 2020

https://reason.com/2020/09/25/rand-paul-tulsi-gabbard-thomas-massie-ron-wyden-join-forces-to-unplug-the-presidents-internet-kill-switch/

Civil libertarians on both sides of the aisle and in both chambers of Congress have joined forces to call for canceling a little-known executive power.

Sens. Rand Paul (R–Ky.), Ron Wyden (D–Ore), and Gary Peters (D–Mich.), along with Reps. Tulsi Gabbard (D–Hawaii) and Thomas Massie (R–Ky.), introduced bills this week to abolish the so-called “internet kill switch”—a sweeping emergency executive authority over communications technology that predates World War II.

“No president from either party should have the sole power to shut down or take control of the internet or any other of our communication channels during an emergency,” Paul argued in a statement announcing the Unplug the Internet Kill Switch Act.

The bill aims to revoke Section 706 of the Communications Act of 1934. When that law was passed, there was no internet. But the broad language included in Section 706 means that it could be invoked today to give a president “nearly unchallenged authority to restrict access to the internet, conduct email surveillance, control computer systems, and cell phones,” Gabbard explained in her statement on the bill.

It’s even worse than that. As Michael Socolow wrote in Reason last year, the law is so broad that it effectively gives the president the ability to commandeer any electronic device that emits radiofrequency transmissions. These days, Socolow noted, that includes “everything from your implanted heart device to the blow dryer for your hair. It includes your electric exercise equipment, any smart device (such as a digital washing machine), and your laptop—basically everything in your house that has electricity running through it.”

Since the United States is technically engaged in 35 ongoing “national emergencies“—thanks in large part to an executive branch that has stripped those words of their meaning—we should probably be grateful that President Donald Trump hasn’t yet reached for this power. He’s already invoked Cold War–era laws to impose greater executive control over global commerce in the name of “national security” and has declared illegal immigration to be a national emergency as a political maneuver to redirect funding for a border wall.

Like many presidents before him, Trump seems willing to use whatever powers Congress has foolishly granted to the executive branch to the fullest extent. Congress should claw back what it can.

“With so many Americans relying on the internet to do everything from online banking to telehealth to education, it’s essential that federal law reflect today’s digital world, not the analog world of World War II,” Carl Szabo, general counsel for NetChoice, a nonprofit that advocates for a free and open internet, tells Reason.

How much the federal government could actually do to shut down the internet remains a subject of debate. The very nature of the net—a diffuse network of interconnected computers and servers—makes it virtually impossible for the government to flip a literal on/off switch or push a stereotypical big red button to cut off all Americans.

 

But the Department of Homeland Security does have protocols for shutting down wireless networks during an emergency, which the agency argues could be used to stop a terrorist from detonating a remote bomb. Given that authoritarian leaders in other countries have shut down wide swaths of internet access during periods of unrest, it’s not unfathomable that something similar could happen here.

“When governments around the world turn off internet access, they do significant harm to their national economies and their citizens’ civil rights,” Massie noted in a statement.

In the midst of an election season in which partisan lines have grown more rigid than ever and when neither major political party seems all that interested in pro-freedom policies, this team-up of libertarian-friendly lawmakers is a little heartwarming. Gabbard, Massie, Paul, and Wyden may not find many allies in Congress on this issue—and, indeed, they don’t always agree with one another—but this is one of those issues that might not seem to matter much until suddenly it really does. It’s better not to wait for that moment.

“The internet,” Wyden declared in a statement, “is far too essential to nearly every part of our democratic system—everything from work, to school and free speech—for any president to have unilateral power to turn it off.”

Be seeing you

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »