MCViewPoint

Opinion from a Libertarian ViewPoint

Posts Tagged ‘Jeffrey Goldberg’

SignalGate 2.0 and the Casual Indifference to War

Posted by M. C. on May 27, 2025

We don’t need to ask about the leaks; we need to ask about the normalization of perpetual war.

https://ronpaulinstitute.org/signalgate-2-0-and-the-casual-indifference-to-war/?fbclid=IwY2xjawKfEu9leHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETFOQTVxcktKQlBFQkpuMGN2AR63s1rrzPuM3xkDggsUuhmz5J5LniE1xuznbF7bFZwLeNaTYlOVSL-qKNTOGg_aem_XAoe9uC7mupaCKJ4Ojezwg

by Abigail R. Hall

We recently learned that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth shared details of impending drone strikes on Yemen in a group chat with his wife, brother and personal attorney. If this story sounds familiar, it’s because it comes just weeks after national security leaders—including Hegseth—accidentally added Atlantic journalist Jeffrey Goldberg to a Signal chat.

The outrage is understandable. Why were military plans shared on an unsecured channel? Were U.S. personnel put at risk? Why did the president not respond strongly to this apparent breach? And of course, the attempted cover-up is making headlines, too.

Something else strikes me. Few seem angry that the government conducts offensive military operations in a country with which we are not formally at war. Headline after headline emphasizes the leaking of war plans—not the “war” itself.

I’ve studied conflict for over a decade. From terrorism and counterterrorism to the development of drone technology and how foreign intervention alters domestic institutions, I know what war does. It kills. It destroys property and devastates economies. It enables people to do the unthinkable—to rape, torture, maim children, and use them as soldiers. War destroys.

Yet, our secretary of defense tells his brother about coming strikes with the same gravity as he’d relay his grocery list.

What’s equally jarring is the public reaction. People aren’t aghast that U.S. drones are killing people in Yemen. People aren’t batting an eye over officials bypassing Congress’s war powers.

We are more concerned about the data leak than about what the data contains.

This indifference isn’t new

See the rest here

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

The Atlantic Is A Shitty Propaganda Rag Run By Elitist Wankers

Posted by M. C. on November 15, 2022

On that note it’s probably worth mentioning here that Applebaum’s husband, European Parliament member Radoslaw Sikorski, recently made headlines by publicly thanking the United States for sabotaging the Nord Stream gas pipelines.

I can’t vouch for the Libertarianism in this article but in the case of the subjects the veracity is unquestioned.

https://caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/the-atlantic-is-a-shitty-propaganda?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

Caitlin Johnstone

11 hr ago

14940

The Atlantic, which is owned by billionaire Laurene Powell Jobs and run by neoconservative war propagandist Jeffrey Goldberg, has published a pair of articles that are appalling even by its own standards.

Virulent Russiagater Anne Applebaum argues in “Fear of Nuclear War Has Warped the West’s Ukraine Strategy” that the US and its allies should escalate against Russia with full confidence that Putin won’t respond with nuclear weapons.

“Here is the only thing we know: As long as Putin believes that the use of nuclear weapons won’t win the war—as long as he believes that to do so would call down an unprecedented international and Western response, perhaps including the destruction of his navy, of his communications system, of his economic model—then he won’t use them,” Applebaum writes.

Jeanne Morefield @JeanneMorefiel1

Anne Applebaum’s disdain for “restraint,” her insouciance regarding the nuclear threat, and her reckless call for “belief”at the end of this article, is truly chilling. This is the new McCarthyism. @PatPorter76 @samuelmoyn @QuincyInst theatlantic.comFear of Nuclear War Has Warped the West’s Ukraine StrategyLeaders shouldn’t give in to Putin’s nuclear rhetoric.9:01 AM ∙ Nov 10, 2022343Likes70Retweets

But throughout her own essay Applebaum also acknowledges that she does not actually know the things she is claiming to know.

“We don’t know whether our refusal to transfer sophisticated tanks to Ukraine is preventing nuclear war,” she writes. “We don’t know whether loaning an F-16 would lead to Armageddon. We don’t know whether holding back the longest-range ammunition is stopping Putin from dropping a tactical nuclear weapon or any other kind of weapon.”

“I can’t prove this to be true, of course, because no one can,” says Applebaum after confidently asserting that more western aggression would actually have deterred Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

These are the kinds of things it’s important to have the highest degree of certainty in before taking drastic actions which can, you know, literally end the world. It’s absolutely nuts how western pundits face more scrutiny and accountability when publicly recommending financial investments than when recommending moves that could end all terrestrial life. 

See the rest here

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »