If you want people to believe a lie, you can’t get mad when they act accordingly.
By Joe Jarvis
You know something is wrong when people consider it prejudiced and hateful to state a basic scientific fact like, “sex is determined by XY or XX chromosomes.”
They have successfully blurred the lines between sex and gender, male and female, science and feelings.
I have no fear of or hatred for transgender people. I’ll even call them by their preferred pronoun since that’s the polite thing to do. It is not my place to tell others how to live their lives.
But it seems like the powers that be want to destroy the meaning of words and ignore science in favor of political correctness. But this has real-world consequences.
One example is professional sports.
Since men and women are biologically different, they have different muscle composition, hormones, and therefore athletic abilities. And when you allow anyone who was born a male to play women’s sports, they have a distinct advantage, even if they have “transitioned.”
So if we deny science, and pretend a “gender reassignment surgery” can actually change a person’s biological sex, say goodbye to women’s sports.
At this point in scientific advancement, a person is stuck with the chromosomes they were born with.
Another example of the problems created by destroying the meaning of words is exemplified in an article called Blurred lines: A pregnant man’s tragedy tests gender notions.
The author criticizes hospital staff for treating a transgender man like a man.
You would think that’s what they are supposed to do, right? Go along with the new make-believe definition of male and female, just like the headlines does (because just a reminder, in the real world, men can’t be pregnant).
But now hospital staff are being blamed for failing to realize that this “man” was pregnant…
“He was rightly classified as a man” in the medical records and appears masculine, Stroumsa [lead author of a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine] said. “But that classification threw us off from considering his actual medical needs.”
Sadly, the “man” ended up losing the baby.
A woman showing up with similar symptoms “would almost surely have been triaged and evaluated more urgently for pregnancy-related problems,” the authors wrote.
You don’t say… Good thing we have these scholarly medical journals to provide these insights.
The real blurred line is the definition of gender versus sex…
These people have to do mental gymnastics to keep up the charade. Healthcare professionals are not responsible for failing to understand these deliberately blurred definitions.
If you want people to believe a lie, you can’t get mad when they act accordingly.
Be seeing you
Citizen: “What are you protesting against” Johnny: “What have you got?” The Wild One
MCViewPoint 