MCViewPoint

Opinion from a Libertarian ViewPoint

Clinton: Motives of Benghazi Attackers Not Important!

Posted by Martin C. Fox on January 24, 2013

Think BHO is bad?  Imagine Hillary and Obama as surgeons specializing in replacing your Constitutional rights with GPS/RFID chips.   Obama at least starts out with a scalpel.  Hillary will go right for the ax.  A dull ax no doubt.  

One would think that a foreign policy “expert” would be VERY concerned about why the “diplomatic mission” was attacked. 

Not our Hillary.

In the words of (can’t come up with a believable answer) Hillary “What does it matter…!”  I am surprised (obviously desperate) Hillary didn’t slam a sensible shoe on the table ala Khrushchev.  At least we didn’t hear (pathological liar) Hillary say she was there and had to dodge bullets…again.

I suspect that Benghazi was more a CIA station than a diplomatic facility, unless you consider the CIA implements more foreign policy than the Foreign Service.

I suspect there were more rebel (jihadist) arms and supplies distributed than food and medical supplies.  Notice the outrage at the plethora of Libyan arms in circulation?  A pre- emptory diversion?

Could it be that the Benghazi attackers didn’t like where the arms were heading or wanted them for themselves?

Do you suppose (I am getting out of this job and lied about getting out of politics because I really want to lead a New World Order) Hillary does not suspect these things but actually knows?

Remember this is the same (friend only when it benefits me) Hillary that in a few weeks went from Eqypt is as solid as a rock to Hosni…you’re hosed! 

This is the same(doesn’t have a clue) Hillary that is the dupe of Sunni/ Al Qaeda  jihadists she is helping take over former US allies in the Middle East color revolutions.

This is the (Obama and I are the gun owners friends) Hillary that the Progressives are already campaigning for.

Think BHO is bad?  Imagine Hillary and Obama as surgeons specializing in replacing your Constitutional rights with GPS/RFID chips.   Obama at least starts out with a scalpel.  Hillary will go right for the ax.  A dull ax no doubt.  

Be seeing you

Advertisements

One Response to “Clinton: Motives of Benghazi Attackers Not Important!”

  1. Doug Rowley said

    Being defensive is the classic indicator of being deceptive. That and actually being transparently deceptive.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: