MCViewPoint

Opinion from a Libertarian ViewPoint

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

The Last Americans To Believe in the Voluntary Union of the States

Posted by M. C. on March 11, 2022

One wonders what the world would think today if say, Vladimir Putin’s generals decimated entire Ukrainian cities occupied only by women and children in this way, after which they were given “honors” and hailed as heroes by Putin himself.

By Thomas DiLorenzo

“If there is to be a separation [i.e., secession of New England], then God bless them [the two countries] both, & keep them in the union if it be for their good, but separate them if it be better.”

  • Thomas Jefferson, Letter to John C. Breckenridge, Aug. 12, 1803, regarding the New England secession movement

“No state . .  can lawfully get out of the union . . . acts against the authority of the United States are insurrectionary . . .”

  • Abraham Lincoln, First Inaugural Address

“Extermination, not of soldiers alone, that is the least of the trouble, but the people [of the South].”

  • Letter from General Sherman to his wife, July 31, 1862, explaining his purpose in the war

Anyone who knows anything about the War to Prevent Southern Independence has heard of General Sherman’s “march to the sea” through Georgia, a pleasant euphemism for all the rape, pillage, plunder, murder, arson, and terrorism of the civilian population by Sherman’s “bummers,” under his direct, personal supervision.  It wasn’t just a pleasant springtime march through the South with bands playing “Yankee Doodle” and “John Brown’s Body.”  Less known, however, is what Sherman’s rapists, plunderers, and murderers did in South Carolina.  A new book by Karen Stokes entitled South Carolina in 1865 compiles letters and diaries by South Carolinians of the day describing what happened when Sherman’s “army” went through Columbia, Charleston, and other South Carolina towns.  (Stokes is an archivist at the South Carolina Historical Society).

Since South Carolina was considered to be the birthplace of the Southern secession movement (A half century after the 1801-1814 New England secession movement culminating in the Hartford Secession Convention of 1814), Sherman had an especially murderous hatred for the people of that state.  In other words, the previous generation of Yankees believed what all Americans believed – that the union was voluntary; the people of the free and independent states were sovereign; that they created the Constitution of the federal government as an instrument to serve them by delegating certain powers to it; and that that they reserved the right to reassume those powers should the federal government interfere with their “happiness.”  Secession was “the” principle of the American Revolution, declared Massachusetts Senator Timothy Pickering, the leader of the New England secession movement who also served as George Washington’s secretary of war and secretary of state. As such, they debated secession for fourteen years, but in the end remained in the union.

The next generation of Yankees sought to destroy the voluntary union of the founding fathers, and they did.  They did not “exterminate” all of the Southern people, as Sherman desired to do as seen in the above letter to his wife, but they did manage to murder one fourth of the Southern male population of military age, maiming for life more than double that number.  Karen Stokes quotes a Walter B. Edgar who reflected shortly after the war of how “Some 60,000 sons of Carolina entered military service . . . .  Of these, 21,146 (35 percent) were killed, a percentage twice that of England, France, Germany, and Russia in World War I when Europe ‘lost’ a generation.”

But South Carolina in1865 is about how Sherman waged total war on the civilian population of South Carolina after the Confederate Army had evacuated.  It was truly an orgy of rape, pillage, plunder, and arson.  In Columbia and Charleston, rockets were set off to announce the beginning of the war crime sprees, proving that Sherman himself, and all the rest of the Union Army high command, including Lincoln, knew of it, orchestrated it, and approved of and celebrated it.  “About six in the evening their work of destruction began,” wrote Josephine LeConte in a letter to her son on Feb. 28, 1865.  She was referring to how Sherman’s “bummers” set fire to almost every single home and building of any kind in Columbia.  “One or two rows of buildings skirting the town are all that are left by that Vandal horde,” she wrote.

The Yankees, meanwhile, made their first stop at any and all liquor stores, and had a riotous good time burning down the town populated by women and children and elderly men.  “As each house was enveloped in flames,” wrote Mrs. LeConte, “their demonic yells of delight coupled with the shrieks and screams of widows and orphans who sought the lawn for asylum in front of our house for protection beggars description.”  Hospitals and churches were not spared either, she wrote.

See the rest here

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

The Real Threat to Humanity Are the Order Takers, not Their Voluntarily Accepted Masters

Posted by M. C. on March 11, 2022

By Gary D. Barnett

“We’ve built a way of life that depends on people doing what they are told because they don’t know how to tell themselves what to do.”

~ John Taylor Gatto, Dumbing Us Down: The Hidden Curriculum of Compulsory Schooling

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Watch “The First Mont Pelerin Society Meeting and the Libertarian Movement Today” on YouTube

Posted by M. C. on March 11, 2022

https://youtu.be/KojAdViUEO0

How does the first meeting of the Mont Pelerin Society in 1947 relate to the libertarian movement today? FFF president Jacob G. Hornberger and Citadel professor Richard M. Ebeling discuss this pivotal movement in libertarian history. Go to the podcast https://libertarianangle.libsyn.com/. Please subscribe to our email newsletter FFF Daily here http://eepurl.com/k4k2n.

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

Inflation: Who or What Is the Culprit?

Posted by M. C. on March 11, 2022

The key factor is not the quantity of money, but where newly created money goes and what people do with it.

Second, at a time when many Americans seem infatuated with socialism, our federal government has given us a painful illustration of how incompetent government is to manage (plan) our economy. In the name of trying to help steer our economy through the pandemic, Uncle Sam has given us high inflation and made millions of Americans poorer.

https://mises.org/wire/inflation-who-or-what-culprit

Mark Hendrickson

What triggered the last year’s explosion in prices? President Joe Biden has tried to blame inflation on greedy corporations and supply-chain disruptions. The former is laughable—there is no rational explanation for why corporations supposedly turned greedy when Biden became president. The latter is partly true—delays in bringing supplies to market have exacerbated price hikes for some goods. The fundamental reason, though, is that when prices are rising almost everywhere, the amount of money bidding for goods has soared while the supply of goods has not.

Orthodox monetarist economics, as espoused by the late Milton Friedman, posits that inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon—that is, when the monetary authorities (in this country, the Federal Reserve System) increase the supply of money, prices will then rise. Unfortunately for the monetarist theory, real-world evidence shows that increases in the money supply more often than not have not triggered higher prices, while at other times, prices have risen without the money supply increasing. In other words, there is no simple, invariable, mechanistic relationship between the supply of money and surging prices for consumer goods. Human action and economic relationships are far more flexible and less predictable than quantitative theories would lead us to believe.

The key factor is not the quantity of money, but where newly created money goes and what people do with it. For example, the supply of money and credit surged in the 1920s, but inflation in consumer prices was negligible. As Murray Rothbard detailed in his book America’s Great Depression, much of the newly created money and credit went into stocks and Florida real estate, inflating massive speculative bubbles that eventually popped, followed by crashing prices.

A more recent case: from 1995 to 2015, the domestic money supply tripled, yet consumer price increases were relatively tame. However, the Fed’s easy money policies definitely fueled the housing bubble that so painfully burst in 2008. Indeed, even the Federal Reserve’s barrage of easy money policies from 2009 to 2020 (zero interest rate policies and QE1, 2, 3, etc.) didn’t lead to large jumps in consumer prices. Instead, under Federal Reserve policies, much of the newly created money and credit that normally would have been lent out to businesses and individuals sat idle on financial institutions’ balance sheets, a buffer against systemic risk. Many other dollars, instead of making new purchases, were used to service the massive amounts of debt that both private and public entities had accumulated. (See these articles from nine and ten years ago.)

Since the financial crisis of 2007–09, loose monetary policy has led to markedly higher prices for stocks and houses. In the last year, though, consumer prices have exploded. The twin causes of this inflation have been the policies of the Fed and Congress and the policies of Presidents Donald Trump and Joe Biden. The Fed has accelerated its rate of money supply increase since 2020. That, in turn, facilitated blowout spending policies by Washington.

Panic driven by the covid pandemic, leaders of both parties adopted the highly problematic policy of going on a spending splurge. Writing in the Wall Street Journal, former Senate Banking Committee chair Phil Gramm (an economist), observed, “Federal spending … set to average 20% of GDP in 2020 and 2021 … doubled to 40% of GDP.” This spending binge included a flood of dollars going directly from the federal treasury to American citizens. Tens of millions of Americans received cash infusions totaling between $1,200 and $3,200 under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act in March 2020, $600 more in December 2020, and $1,400 under the American Rescue Plan, signed in March 2021. At the same time, government lockdowns greatly curtailed the service sector of the economy. Not surprisingly, flush with a cash infusion from Uncle Sam, consumer demand for goods exploded upward, driving prices higher.

So here we sit today—our government an unfathomable $30 trillion in debt (up by over $6 trillion in only two years) and inflation raging at 7.5 percent. The culprits are obvious: Uncle Sam and the Fed. We should draw two important lessons from the present financial fiasco.

First, a central bank in charge of a fiat currency that tailors its policies to accommodate irresponsible deficit spending by the federal government is a menace to society, unleashing forces that it cannot control.

Second, at a time when many Americans seem infatuated with socialism, our federal government has given us a painful illustration of how incompetent government is to manage (plan) our economy. In the name of trying to help steer our economy through the pandemic, Uncle Sam has given us high inflation and made millions of Americans poorer.

Author:

Mark Hendrickson

Mark Hendrickson is adjunct professor of economics at Grove City College. 

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Watch “The Secret NSA building hidden in plain sight” on YouTube

Posted by M. C. on March 11, 2022

DuckDuckGo has been deleted from my search tool bag.

https://youtu.be/OzVSxR19ceM

Once the most trusted search engine for private and neutral search results, Duck Duck Go, just announced that they will now be censoring and filtering content. It may have lost them their core userbase. We’ll dive into some alternative search engines, and share Brave CEO Brendan Eich’s responses about how Brave Search works. Also, it turns out that one of NYC’s most iconic skyscrapers, shrouded in mystery for years with no publicly available information about it, is actually a giant NSA surveillance center. Codenamed TITATITANPOINTE, the center is hidden in plain sight right in the middle of Manhattan, but is actually one of the most important NSA surveillance sites on U.S. soil. Ryan Gallagher and Henrik Moltke wrote a couple of great pieces for the Intercept a while ago diving into these, which recently resurfaced again on Hacker News, that we’ll explore on the show. Read the full investigation here: https://theintercept.com/2016/11/16/t… Laura Poitras, Henrik Moltke documentary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOJug…

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Great Villians

Posted by M. C. on March 10, 2022

Jerome Powell, the Fed’s current chairman, will forever be remembered for claiming that price inflation, which is currently hitting Americans hard, would be “transitory.”

These people are the wrongiest of the wrong, every time.

https://mailchi.mp/tomwoods/fed?e=fa1aba8cd8

One of the great villains of American history — who ranks in the “Near Great” category according to our brain-dead historians — is Woodrow Wilson.

So much bad, including much of what ails us today, can be traced to the self-righteous former president of Princeton University.

The Federal Reserve System, whose boom-bust cycles and price inflation have littered more than one hundred years of U.S. history, was signed into existence by Wilson.

A sliver of the liberty movement has been tricked into thinking Wilson eventually came to regret having established the Fed. They point to a spurious quotation that begins, “I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country.”

Wilson never said this. He was in fact proud of creating the Fed.

The rest of the quotation they use to claim that Wilson regretted creating the Fed is patched together from speeches on other subjects he gave while running for president, before the Fed was even established.

Others think John F. Kennedy was assassinated for trying to abolish the Fed. Oddly enough, most of these people have read, and have great praise for, G. Edward Griffin’s book The Creature from Jekyll Island. But if they’d read closely, they’d see that Griffin debunks the idea that Kennedy made any serious move against the Fed.

I’m not sure why people cling to these myths, although I have a theory: it’s much more comforting to live in a world in which there were some decent presidents who tried their best to advance the people’s interests. It’s nice to think Wilson was duped into creating the Fed, and that JFK heroically gave his life to try to stop it.

It’s much harder to live in a world in which they’re all in on it, and you and I are on our own.

The Fed is the principal regulator of the American banking system. In the years leading up to the 2008 fiasco, chairman Ben Bernanke assured us that the system was sound, that there was nothing fundamentally wrong with the housing market, and on and on with downright laughable denials of reality.

Then the crash came, and the alleged experts all pretended no one could have seen it coming.

Ron Paul and his economist colleagues saw it coming, some of them describing to a T precisely what would happen, but since Dr. Paul wasn’t fashionable he wasn’t listened to.

Jerome Powell, the Fed’s current chairman, will forever be remembered for claiming that price inflation, which is currently hitting Americans hard, would be “transitory.”

These people are the wrongiest of the wrong, every time.

It is not true that the Fed gave us fewer and shallower recessions than we saw before, or that we’ve had more stability with the Fed. Whatever the propaganda in the Fed’s favor, you can be sure it’s made up.

Well beyond COVID, I devote every single weekday on the Tom Woods Show to debunking the ridiculous narratives that the establishment expects us to believe.

I’ve spent plenty of time discussing the economics of the Fed, but I recently had the great Saifedean Ammous on the show to discuss other, less obvious consequences of fiat money, among them the industrial sludge we’re urged to eat.

Enjoy, and consider joining the tens of thousands who make the Tom Woods Show part of their daily routine:

Tom Woods

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

A Man for All Seasons

Posted by M. C. on March 10, 2022

By Ira Katz

There has been a plethora of villains to be prosecuted after the conflict over Covid-19 is won (but that is far from a sure thing). On the other hand, there are the heroes to be venerated such as Naomi Wolf has done in a recent article posted on LRC, where she also lambasted the cowards. Here I would like to present one relatively unknown hero, Dr. Francis Christian.

I learned about Dr. Christian from a street interview from Ottawa with Vivafrei who did hours and hours of live streams during the truckers protest. He later did a long interview of Dr. Christian with his partner Robert Barnes. The doctor speaks with the voice of a Shakepearian actor and with old world manners. Originally from India, he did his medical training in India, Britain, and Canada. He has been a practicing surgeon in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan since 2007. His official post is Clinical Professor of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan. Furthermore, he was appointed director of the Surgical Humanities Program and director of Quality and Patient Safety in 2018 and co-founded the Surgical Humanities Program. Flowing from his deep interest in the humanities is his poetry. Being a healer, teacher and poet could make Dr. Christian a man for all seasons. But it was his speaking out based on his conscientious objections to vaccinating children that clearly established his character to the world.

Consider this quote on A Man for All Seasons from Wikipedia, “The title [of the play and movie] reflects 20th century agnostic playwright Robert Bolt’s portrayal of [Thomas] More as the ultimate man of conscience. As one who remains true to himself and his beliefs while adapting to all circumstances and times, despite external pressure or influence,” He was penalized by being removed from his academic posts (listen to the creepy indictment meeting in the link) for speaking out. Here is a negative article, Controversial Saskatoon professor penned his own fate | Healthing.ca, yet this excerpt describes Christian and his situation rather well.

“The romance novel’s protagonist sounds like a true hero — a virtuous doctor willing to stand up to the medical establishment over a drug he believes is causing illness and death.

Here’s an excerpt from an online description: “David’s principles of professionalism, justice, fair play and scientific inquiry lead him to challenge the medical-surgical industrial complex in a risky, dangerous and highly charged race to truth.”

The novel appears to have been self-published about a decade ago by Frank Christian [a link to this book], known more widely as surgery professor Dr. Francis Christian. He’s also a poet.

For those of us struggling to understand this man and why he would jeopardize an impressive career and reputation, this might provide some insight into his world view.

Christian has suffered mightily in the wake of his public efforts to question the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and the reality of the pandemic.

He was suspended from his academic roles in the department of surgery at the University of Saskatchewan’s College of Medicine while his behaviour is reviewed.

He’s also been fired from his role as director of quality improvement and patient safety with the Saskatchewan Health Authority.

He’ll continue to get full pay from the U of S during the review, and his contract with the SHA continues to September.

During a meeting at which he was informed about the removals last week, he compared the officials informing him to panels in the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany.

Christian is facing discipline largely for his starring role at a bizarre news conference in Saskatoon this month.”

In one of the many interviews I have heard with Drs. Malone and McCullough (both on Wolf’s list of heroes), Malone mentioned that being unreligious, he had noticed the pattern of religious belief in those speaking out like McCullough. Even the Wall Street warrior Edward Dowd is driven, or at least supported by faith. Dr. Christian is an Indian from India, yet alluded to his christian faith in the long interview. So there must be a story in his very western name.

When asked how he could be supported he only mentioned his book of poetry called To a Nurse Friend Weeping. I don’t read much poetry, though I find listening to it much more enjoyable and moving. So I bought his book really only to support him in his trial and cannot comment on the quality of the work. But I will note the following poem for LRC, anti-war readers.

Live Free Or Die, Was New To Me
I always thought to die free was liberty,
freedom found within, like fire lightning
the last post, life lived not in longing
for embrace forever of mortal flesh,
but eternity smoking out time,
and today like tomorrow lived abundantly
Another army with clanging steel
or homing missiles making free,
will soon be bound by tyranny …
and then our nests of never again
are scattered soon by another eagle
with sharpened talons swooping.
Better far is freedom lived within,
and being freed indeed, be liberty.

For me Reflection on the March to Sorrow was perhaps the most poignant poem in the collection. The first and last lines are given below.

I know your heart was shred and mind benumbed
the better human being dead

.

.
.

And did home give you humble joys
you hoped to find wrapped
in parcels of simple happiness?
a kiss, a word, a hug, a joke
cutting through the icy stillness of the soul?

In actual fact it did!
or you would long be dead.
And over the hugs and tears
that licked your fears
the Cross towered over the wreck.

Ira Katz [send him mail] lives in France. He is a retired engineer/professor/scientist and  is the co-author of Handling Mr. Hyde: Questions and Answers about Manic Depression and Introduction to Fluid Mechanics.

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

What’s Really Up with Ukraine? Deep State Seeking New World Order

Posted by M. C. on March 10, 2022

The Biden Regime is negotiating with Iran and Venezuela to buy oil. They will literally do anything to avoid restarting the Keystone pipeline and anything to prevent US energy independence, even in the face of this immense crisis that they’ve created.

The New American magazine’s Alex Newman has an answer to that question: “The Russians are deeply in bed with these clowns at the World Economic Forum. Putin’s central bank chief is on the World Economic Forum’s Board of Trustees. Vladimir Putin is good friends with Henry Kissinger, the ultimate New World Order Deep State toady here, in the United States; the Rockefeller poodle who made his living serving as a shill for the New World Order.

For all of the vilification outwardly being heaped upon Putin by the establishment, the sanctions being placed on Russia by this same establishment will do a lot more to hurt the West than they will to hurt Russia.

The Biden Regime is negotiating with Iran and Venezuela to buy oil. They will literally do anything to avoid restarting the Keystone pipeline and anything to prevent US energy independence, even in the face of this immense crisis that they’ve created.

On Monday, we saw Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg tell people who can’t afford $4 gas that they should buy $60k Electric Vehicles. It should be clear by now to even the dumbest people that, together with the promotion of this war, the Climate Change agenda being promoted by the Globalists is about collapsing the West, ending the Petrodollar and ending the US dollar as a reserve currency. Everything we see from the propped-up corpse of a Biden Presidency is about the Globalists’ controlled demolition of American sovereignty, power and prestige.

The World Economic Forum is now suddenly mass-deleting their cyber attack “plans” from their websites, which they admit will kill millions of people and they’ve also deleted their profiles of Vladimir Putin, who was one of the earliest graduates of the WEF’s Young Global Leaders program.

This has some wondering whether the former KGB agent was spying on the Globalist organization to protect Russia’s interests or if he was being trained for his role as a major player in the New World Order agenda?

The New American magazine’s Alex Newman has an answer to that question: “The Russians are deeply in bed with these clowns at the World Economic Forum. Putin’s central bank chief is on the World Economic Forum’s Board of Trustees. Vladimir Putin is good friends with Henry Kissinger, the ultimate New World Order Deep State toady here, in the United States; the Rockefeller poodle who made his living serving as a shill for the New World Order.

“So what comes next? They’re going to bring in a central bank digital currency. The Ukrainians are working on this big time. We’re seeing massive things taking place, This is all by design and it’s all engineered…

“You’ve got Zelenskyy demanding that the EU immediately grant membership to Ukraine…Zelenskyy has also called on the United Nations ‘court’ – the kangaroo court – to step in and stop the Russian invasion…

“We see the Finnish government talking about how they’re going to join NATO. We see the Swedish government talking about ‘maybe we’re going to join NATO,’ as a result of this invasion from Putin.

“And so, what they’re doing, Folks is they’re demolishing sovereign nation-states, they’re amalgamating them all into these freakish regional orders, exactly like Henry Kissinger explained in his book, ‘World Order’.

“He said the key to achieving world order is getting these countries involved in these regional orders and then merging all those regional orders together.

“Folks, that’s exactly what Putin has been trying to do for many, many years and we’ve been exposing it all here, on the New American.

“He’s building a Eurasian Union with the former Soviet States and he has said publicly that this future Eurasian Union should be fused with the European Union to have a free trade area, stretching from Lisbon to Vladivostok, Folks.

“We are being played. Don’t line up behind Putin. Don’t line up behind this kleptocratic Far-Left radical extremist government in Ukraine, none of them are your friends. Don’t line up behind the European Union, Folks. You don’t have to choose one or the other. That’s what the Deep State does. They give you two false choices, they let us all line up behind one and we can argue with each other and no matter which one wins, they win.”

Contributed by Alexandra Bruce

Contact

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

White House Claims Russia Could Launch Biological or Chemical Attack in Ukraine

Posted by M. C. on March 10, 2022

The article quoted Robert Pope of the DTRA’s Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, who warned some of the labs could have Pathogens leftover from the Soviet Union’s bioweapons program.

Or just maybe leftovers from Wuhan, Fort Dietrich, Plum Island, Kenema Hospital…

https://news.antiwar.com/2022/03/09/

by Dave DeCamp

The US dismissed the idea that it’s funding bioweapons research in Ukraine, but there are Pentagon-linked biological research labs in the country

On Wednesday, the White House claimed without evidence that Russia might use chemical or biological weapons to create a false flag operation in Ukraine. The White House also dismissed Moscow’s accusations that the US is involved in biological weapons research in Ukraine even though there are Pentagon-linked labs in the country.

On Twitter, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said to be on the lookout “for Russia to possibly use chemical or biological weapons in Ukraine, or to create a false flag operation using them.” She said Russia’s claim of the US having biological weapons labs in Ukraine is “preposterous.”

Psaki’s denial comes a day after Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland said there are “biological research facilities” in Ukraine the US is concerned Russian forces might seize. Nuland made the comments after being asked if there are bioweapons in Ukraine and said the US is working with the Ukrainians to keep “research materials” out of Russia’s hands.

The Russian military has claimed that it uncovered 30 biological laboratories in Ukraine linked to the Pentagon’s Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA). On Wednesday, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said Russia has documents that show Ukraine ordered the destruction of samples of plague, cholera, anthrax, and other pathogens before Russia launched its attack on February 24.

According to a February 25 article from the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, the US government has worked with 26 biological research facilities in Ukraine. The article quoted Robert Pope of the DTRA’s Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, who warned some of the labs could have Pathogens leftover from the Soviet Union’s bioweapons program.

Author: Dave DeCamp

Dave DeCamp is the news editor of Antiwar.com, follow him on Twitter @decampdave.

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

And Now For Something Completely Different – How We Incentivize Peace in the World

Posted by M. C. on March 10, 2022

Let’s set our objectives for what needs to happen to achieve a lasting peace, economically. We need to sustainably raise the cost of invading or occupying a foreign land and we need to lower the cost to defend a peaceful nation. If we could accomplish these two things we would be heading in the right direction.

https://libertarianinstitute.org/articles/how-we-incentivize-peace-in-the-world/

by Nolan Miller

If you are reading this, there’s a good chance you are one of the people in the world that wants to see all foreign militaries go home and for governments to focus on their own issues rather than intervening in other countries. Maybe you post news stories on Facebook or other social media outlets to try to raise awareness to the cause. I’m going to tell you that even if the tide turns in our favor and we pressure our government to bring the troops home, or a bankruptcy forces this to happen, unless a plan is put in place to ever-incentivize it to stay that way, eventually the forces of imperialism will return.

The fact is, while libertarians are a breed who are highly motivated and passionate for peace, to ask all people to be ever-vigilant for the cause of peace is not realistic. Maybe that’s a good thing. People should mostly focus on family, friends, and work. That said, we are responsible for and empowered by the wisdom of economics and the accounts of world history. We need not fear that governments are untamable or that peace is unattainable.

Let’s set our objectives for what needs to happen to achieve a lasting peace, economically. We need to sustainably raise the cost of invading or occupying a foreign land and we need to lower the cost to defend a peaceful nation. If we could accomplish these two things we would be heading in the right direction.

First, let’s discuss our current policy of collective security. This is an agreement wherein all member nations accept that the security of one is the concern of all, and therefore commit to a collective response to threats and breaches of peace. It’s a plan that promises protection, but guarantees military interventions.

If a nation’s leadership has no intention of ever attacking another nation or has no desire to be involved in a war that doesn’t directly involve the protection of its own borders, what’s the incentive to obligate a country to being dragged into a war involving another country’s border infringements? There is the promise of protection for its own borders in case of invasion, but it has multiplied the possible scenarios in which it can be involved in a war.

If it does become obligated, a nation can find itself in a difficult battle that has no direct benefit to its own people. A more precarious fight awaits, as the home nation always has the advantages of motivated countrymen who are willing to fight, familiarity with the topography, and shorter supply lines. Let’s face it, the home team usually wins. A pact that compels member nations to join the battle, mostly in foreign nations, has just signed up to a war schedule of all away games. It’s going to be a long season.

This policy, far from accomplishing the goal of deterring invasions, occupations, or limiting the costs of defending peaceful nations, has actually compelled member nations to become invaders, occupiers, and budget busters of their own government’s finances in the cause of “defending” other nations protected under the agreement. This is heading in the wrong direction from our goals. So, how do we flip the script?

A free trade agreement that rests conditionally on non-aggression. This is an agreement which would open up the opportunity for free trade among all nations with the caveat that member nations must maintain all their military within their own borders. This pact does not obligate its members to commit troops in case of a breach of peace; it instead asks member nations to remove their troops and munitions from all foreign lands at the onset of the agreement.

As an incentive to keep the peace, all businesses within the compliant nations will enjoy unrestricted free trade with other members of the pact. Those businesses whose governments do not comply would have to pay an import tariff to all member nations. If a government chooses not to participate in the pact, the industries of that nation would forfeit the benefits of unrestricted free trade and may also be subject to the same tariffs as a non-compliant nation.

The Benefits

  1. The businesses of peaceful member nations will have free trade access to all member nations for their exports, which will make their products more competitive in all member nations and open up opportunities for further trade.
  2. All member nations will receive imports from peaceful member nations free of tariffs. This will enable the world’s producers who can most efficiently supply the world’s consumers with the best priced and highest quality products to do so; enriching both nations as a whole through the process of comparative advantage. There’s also the benefit of supporting more businesses from peaceful nations, and less from hostile nations, if you are concerned about politically ethical consumerism.
  3. Any government who has troops on foreign soil (whether at war, stationed, invited or uninvited) would subject the businesses of that country to pay the conditional tariff. There is no free trade for businesses of non-compliant nations. This is income, not obligations, for peaceful members of the pact. It’s also a great motivator for businesses to use their influence on their government to bring home the troops, which is the key to keeping them home permanently.

The Cost and Opportunities

  1. Member nations will be obligated to protect the waters and borders around each nation to ensure that businesses can ship their products with limited fear of piracy and other controllable hazards. Due to the implications of a conditional tariff, single nations could no longer afford to police the world from afar. The pressure from suffering businesses subjected to a conditional tariff would compel governments to stay home or risk bankrupting their industries and their own government. The local nations will have to be involved or pay private industries to protect safe travel for international business in their region of the world. This may be an opportunity for more cooperation between neighboring countries to work together to ensure this to happen.
  2. Some domestic producers may struggle to compete with free trade foreign producers. It will be up to those domestic producers and their governments to adapt to the new competitive worldwide market.
  3. Abandoned foreign military outposts would be absorbed by the nation in which they reside to use as airports, domestic military outposts, or sold to private companies. The land’s use would be at the discretion of the heads of state of that nation.

The traditional goal of using import tariffs to protect less competitive domestic producers would be replaced in favor of consumer and business-to-business freedoms and cost savings to freely trade with potentially better valued foreign products. Unrestricted free trade accomplishes the goal of opening up international trade for nations with stay-at-home military operations and munitions (MOM, for short).

Protectionism would gain a new meaning as a policy that promotes the protection of peaceful nations through the taxation of imported trade from hostile or intervening nations. Members would not be allowed to levy an import tax on peaceful nations without being in violation of the pact, and thus non-compliant. Governments would be heavily incentivized to handle their disputes through diplomatic means rather than unlawful tariffs or military actions. The expensive and failed policy of policing the world would be abandoned.

Multinational corporations based in hostile countries, but operating in peaceful foreign lands would not pay a tariff on goods exported from those peaceful nations. Goods produced in the home country would still pay the tariff. This would encourage multinationals to produce goods in peaceful nations and add more pressure from workers in hostile nations to compel their government to bring home troops to save jobs.

Terms of the agreement would need to hashed out by the member nations. Other forms of anti-competitive practices would need to be addressed, such as: predatory pricing, patent infringements, government subsidizing, among others. The issue of cyber attacks and covert operations within a foreign nation would ideally be considered a violation in such a pact, and mark a member nation as non-compliant. Add-on terms that dealt with environmental concerns may be a possibility.

This is a plan for peace, built on the shoulders of other ideas and still searching for insights and discussions with others, so that maybe we can get to a world where a pact like this could exist. The first step is to accept that all previously attempted non-aggression pacts have failed, and do not need to be recycled into future failures. We need innovative thoughts and ideas that adhere to real world economics, or better praxeology. Ideas that flourish within the natural laws that govern our individual actions will succeed if given the opportunity to exist.

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »