
Be seeing you
Posted by M. C. on January 31, 2022
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: Build Back Better | Leave a Comment »
Posted by M. C. on January 31, 2022
Millions of Canadians, led by working class truckers, have put their foot down on the political class that has kept them hostage for the past two years. The media hacks scream “extremism” but the movement is going worldwide. Also today – Fauci says three jabs for your kids; Malone disagrees – who do you trust? And UK health workers see the end of the vax mandate.

Be seeing you
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: Canada, Freedom Convoy, UK, Vax Mandate | Leave a Comment »
Posted by M. C. on January 31, 2022
As you fight the mandates in your own life, as you shift the world around you toward a more free place, I need you to be mindful that sometime soon, that accountability phase will take place, and if you are ready, and have some established relationships and credibility, you will be part of those building the framework for a new America — one in which this will never again be allowed to occur.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/01/allan-stevo/are-you-ready-for-the-accountability-phase/
By Allan Stevo
Sometime in the near future, people will snap out of what is happening.
Normal will return.
An angry public will want accountability. The public health establishment has figured out exactly how to distract you from this. You must not be distracted.
What will be needed are people in roles like these:
1.) People friendly enough with local politicians to be able to encourage them privately through a period of accountability (not during a public meeting, not during a yelled out public comment, not over Zoom).
2.) People friendly enough with local editors to get a 500 word op-ed published in the local newspaper will be needed. People who can be background explaining the other side of a story to a reporter or editor will be needed. Having some established relationship with people in the media and a reputation for being knowledgeable on this topic will be needed.
3.) People friendly enough with local law enforcement, especially prosecutors, to be able to help them talk over (privately) what happens next will be needed.
Do I expect you to be your local dictator, calling the shots on everything? No, but I expect you to have a seat at the table. Once you are at the table, your knowledge will shine, your sense of what is right will shine. If you are not in the room, you are not in the deal. No representative can represent someone like you. You are one of the most valuable members of your community at a time like the one we are about to go through and the knowledge you bring — I am not using this word lightly — is irreplaceable.
No one in your community has the combined local and global knowledge of what is taking place that you do. No matter how big your local freedom cell is, I believe what I have said here is still true.
You must understand the unique situation you are in, a situation you have likely never been in and a situation that you will likely never again be in. The times you are living through will set the stage for the centuries ahead. Perfection is not needed of you. You’ve already laid the groundwork phenomenally. All that is needed of you is to step forward effectively and to keep doing so unceasingly.
Your vim and vigor, tactfully delivered, will be enough.
Obey The Truth, Not Your Feelings
Feelings are fleeting. They are meaningful, but they are a poor foundation upon which to build.
Sometimes people write me saying “I don’t want to turn people off when I present my argument.” There are ways to present the truth harshly and ways to present the truth gently. It is good to speak in a way that reaches others. However, if you are in any way avoiding the truth in conversations, then you are playing the simp and are not behaving like the leader this moment needs.
This moment needs people like you to rise to the occasion in roles like the above.
You do not get there by being a simp who stands for nothing. You get there by being someone who is clear with everyone around him about his values so that everyone in his community is able to say “Love him or hate him, this guy really knows his stuff on this topic.”
If you are still uncertain about the necessity of truth-telling in this era of deceit, I will point out that some of my readers were born into this world and expected to be truth-tellers, no matter what. That is the birthright of some of you. Author Stephen Baskerville goes so far as to write “He who is afraid to anger or offend is not yet a man.” Please, step into your own, as a bright shining light of truth, tactfully delivered, appropriate to the circumstances, no matter what the imagined impact of telling the truth may be.
Leadership Is Needed, And That Means You
Be seeing you
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: Accountability Phase, mandates, public health establishment | Leave a Comment »
Posted by M. C. on January 31, 2022
The key to developing effective human augmentation is an improved understanding of how both the body and technology work and how they work together. This will require access to, and analysis of, personal data: whether it is psychophysiological variables, collection of personal reference data, analysis of medical markers, or supervision of training routines.
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/human-augmentation-the-dawn-of-a
The report: “Human Augmentation – The Dawn of a New Paradigm. A strategic implications project” was published jointly by the UK Ministry of Defense, and German Federal Ministry of Defense in 2021. Reading this document is frankly chilling as the the idea of using human augmentation for warfare is considered a fait accompli by the authors. That planning for human augmentation must start now.
We can assume that although this report is coming from the UK Ministry of Defense, and German Federal Ministry of Defense, parallel efforts are being made by most large governments around the world.
To begin this report highlights the important and benefits of human augmentation. From the report:
Human augmentation will become increasingly relevant, partly because it can directly enhance human capability and behavior and partly because it is the binding agent between people and machines. Future wars will be won, not by those with the most advanced technology, but by those who can most effectively integrate the unique capabilities of both people and machines. The importance of human-machine teaming is widely acknowledged but it has been viewed from a techno-centric perspective. Human augmentation is the missing part of this puzzle.
Of course, one of the first questions that must be asked when reading this report is what is human augmentation. An image from the report lists the technologies. The back of the report details these technologies in great detail:

The document goes on to write that the role of ethics and public perception in the use of human augmentation are not the deciding factors in developing human augmentation. The general consensus of the report is that human augmentation is critical for national security for the future development of warfare. It will be the military industrial complex (national interests) the ultimately decides what is developed.
Feasibility assessment
We cannot wait for the ethics of human augmentation to be decided for us, we
must be part of the conversation now. The ethical implications are significant but not insurmountable; early and regular engagement will be essential to remain at the forefront of this field. Ethical perspectives on human augmentation will change and this could happen quickly. There may be a moral obligation to augment people, particularly in cases where it promotes well-being or protects us from novel threats. It could be argued that treatments involving novel vaccination processes and gene and cell therapies are examples of human augmentation already in the pipeline.The need to use human augmentation may ultimately be dictated by national interest.
Countries may need to develop and use human augmentation or risk surrendering influence, prosperity and security to those who will. National regulations dictating the pace and scope of scientific research reflect societal views, particularly in democracies that are more sensitive to public opinion. The future of human augmentation should not, however, be decided by ethicists or public opinion, although both will be important voices; rather, governments will need to develop a clear policy position that maximises the use of human augmentation in support of prosperity, safety and security, without undermining our values.
The report goes on:
Human augmentation is our first insight of what lies beyond today’s Information
Age – the coming of the Biotech age. The Biotech age will see focus on the human grow. No longer will it be adequate to regard people merely as the means to operate
the machine. The interdisciplinary nature of human augmentation will render our current Industrial Age model of Defense ineffective. Defense must consider how it reorganizes to meet a future that will demand a human-centric approach to warfare where the person is armed with the capabilities to integrate fully into a single platform.Differences in national, cultural and legal approaches will lead to an uneven uptake
of human augmentation within international alliances. This will further complicate interoperability, integration and deconfliction. Overcoming these challenges will demand closer cooperation between allies. Alliances must therefore start work now to understand how and where to prepare for the use of human augmentation.
In reading this report, it is important to understand how military complexes around the world view the human augmentation model for warfare.
Be seeing you
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: brain interface, genetics, German Federal Ministry of Defense, human augmentation, pharmaceuticals, UK Ministry of Defense | Leave a Comment »
Posted by M. C. on January 31, 2022
http://bionicmosquito.blogspot.com/2022/01/back-in-game.html
When Jordan Peterson first came back to the public spotlight after his illness, he was slow to engage again on some of the topics that brought him to the fore during his first big wave. This, of course, is understandable given what he apparently went through with his illness. However, it was clear that the lack of his voice would be detrimental to exposing the underlying causes of the meaning crisis and resultant convulsions in the West.
This was most sorely missed in the context of the insanity behind everything covid. Unlike Bret Weinstein, who began speaking out against many of the policies and reactions to this not-a-plague, Peterson was quiet.
This has changed. In the last couple of months, there were signs of his re-awakening. I recall a clip – I don’t remember from where – where he said something like “well, perhaps shame on me, but I took your damn vaccine. Why won’t you leave me alone?”
Recently he was on Joe Rogan. More than four hours, and I will summarize – not from the video, but from the first items that come up on a google search:
I do recall reading that Peterson also poked at the entire covid narrative in this interview, but even when I added the word “covid” to the search, only one item came up in the first couple of pages.
Peterson recently released a discussion he had with Brian Peckford, entitled “Canadian Constitutional Crisis.” From the show notes:
Brian Peckford and I discussed his reentry to the political arena after denouncing the Canadian Government for infringements on the Canadian Charter of Rights–a document he played a key role in drafting. In this intense conversation, Peckford outlines a combined plan of action against the Canadian Government over their COVID-19 response and ongoing use of power.
Starting his career as an educator, the Honorable Brian Peckford then served as the premier of Newfoundland and Labrador for nearly a decade. He is also an author, former minister, and notable member of the PC Party.
Peckford was directly involved, forty years ago, in the drafting of and agreement to the Canadian Charter of Rights. So he has some idea of both the spirit and letter of the document. He is filing a lawsuit in Canadian court regarding the government’s actions, specifically focused on the violation of the Charter on the point of freedom of association.
I won’t summarize the video, other than to say Peckford is very well read on the nonsensical (so-called) science behind the political reactions to covid. Oh, and apparently Justin Trudeau’s father Pierre, who was also Prime Minister during the passing of the Canadian Charter, was as big a snake as Justin is.
There are a couple of quibbles I have with the comments, but overall both Peterson and Peckford have their eyes open.
The video is about an hour and twenty minutes. It seems it was so important for Peterson to release it quickly that there was zero editing – there is nothing polished about the production. This was by design, as will be explained in the opening – which captures the pre-planning of the video.
Conclusion
When Peterson first returned to the scene about a year ago, I noted, with understanding, his timidity. It seems he is now finding the strength to break free of this.
Be seeing you
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: Brian Peckford, Joe Rogan, Jordan Peterson | Leave a Comment »
Posted by M. C. on January 30, 2022
Quite a fringe group!
Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau and his family have left their home in Ottawa for a secret location, the CBC reports, amid security concerns as thousands pour into the Canadian capital on Saturday in trucker convoys to protest vaccine mandates.
The PM’s office has said it will not comment on Mr Trudeau’s location for security reasons…
Be seeing you
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: Canada trucker, Justin Trudeau, trucker protests, Vaccine Mandates | Leave a Comment »
Posted by M. C. on January 30, 2022
All factions, at certain points, succumb to the impulse to censor. But for the Democratic Party’s liberal adherents, silencing their adversaries has become their primary project.
https://greenwald.substack.com/p/the-pressure-campaign-on-spotify
American liberals are obsessed with finding ways to silence and censor their adversaries. Every week, if not every day, they have new targets they want de-platformed, banned, silenced, and otherwise prevented from speaking or being heard (by “liberals,” I mean the term of self-description used by the dominant wing of the Democratic Party).
For years, their preferred censorship tactic was to expand and distort the concept of “hate speech” to mean “views that make us uncomfortable,” and then demand that such “hateful” views be prohibited on that basis. For that reason, it is now common to hear Democrats assert, falsely, that the First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech does not protect “hate speech.” Their political culture has long inculcated them to believe that they can comfortably silence whatever views they arbitrarily place into this category without being guilty of censorship.
Constitutional illiteracy to the side, the “hate speech” framework for justifying censorship is now insufficient because liberals are eager to silence a much broader range of voices than those they can credibly accuse of being hateful. That is why the newest, and now most popular, censorship framework is to claim that their targets are guilty of spreading “misinformation” or “disinformation.” These terms, by design, have no clear or concise meaning. Like the term “terrorism,” it is their elasticity that makes them so useful.
When liberals’ favorite media outlets, from CNN and NBC to The New York Times and The Atlantic, spend four years disseminating one fabricated Russia story after the next — from the Kremlin hacking into Vermont’s heating system and Putin’s sexual blackmail over Trump to bounties on the heads of U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan, the Biden email archive being “Russian disinformation,” and a magical mystery weapon that injures American brains with cricket noises — none of that is “disinformation” that requires banishment. Nor are false claims that COVID’s origin has proven to be zoonotic rather than a lab leak, the vastly overstated claim that vaccines prevent transmission of COVID, or that Julian Assange stole classified documents and caused people to die. Corporate outlets beloved by liberals are free to spout serious falsehoods without being deemed guilty of disinformation, and, because of that, do so routinely.
This “disinformation” term is reserved for those who question liberal pieties, not for those devoted to affirming them. That is the real functional definition of “disinformation” and of its little cousin, “misinformation.” It is not possible to disagree with liberals or see the world differently than they see it. The only two choices are unthinking submission to their dogma or acting as an agent of “disinformation.” Dissent does not exist to them; any deviation from their worldview is inherently dangerous — to the point that it cannot be heard.
The data proving a deeply radical authoritarian strain in Trump-era Democratic Party politics is ample and have been extensively reported here. Democrats overwhelmingly trust and love the FBI and CIA. Polls show they overwhelmingly favor censorship of the internet not only by Big Tech oligarchs but also by the state. Leading Democratic Party politicians have repeatedly subpoenaed social media executives and explicitly threatened them with legal and regulatory reprisals if they do not censor more aggressively — a likely violation of the First Amendment given decades of case law ruling that state officials are barred from coercing private actors to censor for them, in ways the Constitution prohibits them from doing directly.
Democratic officials have used the pretexts of COVID, “the insurrection,” and Russia to justify their censorship demands.
Be seeing you
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: censorship, Democratic Party, Joe Rogan, Spotify | Leave a Comment »
Posted by M. C. on January 30, 2022
Matt Agorist
Las Vegas, NV — If you were to read the local news sites in Las Vegas earlier this month, you would think that police — while saving the public from a dangerous murderer — were ambushed and two of them were shot, barely escaping with their lives. The “shooter’s” face, plastered on news sites, telling the public that he fired 18 shots at officers before they finally and heroically killed him. But Isaiah Tyree Williams wasn’t so much a shooter as he was a victim of police violence. Their badges do nothing to change this reality.
After police executed Williams in his own home, a report from a local CBS affiliate read as follows, “Police said the shooter, 19-year-old Isaiah Tyree Williams, opened fire when officers broke a window and entered the apartment near Nellis Boulevard and Vegas Valley Drive at about 5 a.m. on Monday.”
But the question is this: does defending your home from armed intruders make you a “shooter”?
Had Williams been accused or suspected of a crime, perhaps police may have been more justified in their actions. However, he was not. Williams was not the person police were looking for and thanks to their brutal incompetence, two cops are recovering from bullet wounds and a black teenager is dead.
On that early morning raid, police were looking for 23-year-old Wattsel Rembert who was not staying at that apartment. Rembert is accused of participating in a shooting at a casino back in November. Instead of simply arresting Rembert in a normal manner, police chose to dangerously show up in the middle of the night, bash in doors, throw flash bang grenades, and put everyone involved in danger.
During the raid, Williams, who was asleep on the sofa when armed intruders broke into his home, began firing after a flashbang grenade smashed through his window. Police answered back with their AR-15s and pistols, firing 23 shots into the teen’s body — executing him on the sofa. He was still under the blanket when he died.
Two of the armed intruders, Officer Kerry Kubla, 50, and Officer Brice Clements, 36 were injured in the shooting.
After the shooting, police held a press conference, during which they demonized Williams, rattling off all the charges Williams would have faced for defending himself in his own home against armed intruders who threw a grenade through his window as he slept.
“Had he survived,” police explained, “Williams would have been arrested on counts of attempted murder with use of a deadly weapon on a first responder; battery with a deadly weapon on a first responder, assault on a first responder and three counts of discharging a firearm into an occupied structure.”
For defending himself against armed intruders, clearly intent on doing him harm in his own home as he slept.
As you watch the video below, it is clear that police did yell, “police department, search warrant.” But they did so as they bashed in windows, set off a flash bang grenade and used a battering ram on the door.
The idea that a person — who had committed no crime — is supposed to wake up calmly as windows are breaking and grenades are exploding in their home is utterly asinine and speaks to the failed and ineffective nature of no-knock raids. Sadly, judging by the comments from Assistant Sheriff Andrew Walsh, police still think that early morning no-knock raids keep them safe.
“You have to take into consideration the danger to officers, the danger to the community if you’re ever in that area and in that neighborhood,” Walsh said. “In the early morning hours, it’s much safer for the officers and it’s much safer for the community for us to do it at that time because there are less people out.”
Had Williams not been executed and two officers shot during this raid, Walsh’s comments would be laughable. Unfortunately, however, they highlight the sheer disconnect between the reality of policing and playing warrior cop.
Exposing the entirely unnecessary nature of the raid is the fact that the actual person police were looking for, Wattsel Rembert, turned himself into police without incident.
Watch as cowboy cops in Las Vegas, Nevada serve a warrant on WRONG person; KILL HIM as he tries to figure out if he’s victim of home invasion. *Full shooting shown. pic.twitter.com/je7UoPBrt4
— Sarah Ashton-Cirillo (@SarahAshtonLV) January 19, 2022
Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA. This prior experience gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state. Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world. Agorist is also the Editor at Large at the Free Thought Project. Follow @MattAgorist on Twitter, Steemit, and now on Minds.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: Brice Clements, Kerry Kubla, Las Vegas, Police Execute, Tyree Williams | Leave a Comment »