MCViewPoint

Opinion from a Libertarian ViewPoint

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Erie Times E-Edition Article-CDC recommends public stop kissing chickens

Posted by M. C. on August 8, 2021

https://erietimes-pa-app.newsmemory.com/?publink=11b42a00e_1345e9c

Garret Roberts Beaver County Times USA TODAY NETWORK While they may be cute, giving your chickens a quick ‘peck’ on the head has some negative side effects.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has issued a warning for chicken owners, advising them to avoid ‘chicken kissing.’ Based on the rising numbers of salmonella in the United States, it is advised that those with chickens as pets or those raising poultry practice increased safety around their birds.

According to the CDC, there were 163 poultry-based cases of salmonella as of May. From those infections, 34 people were hospitalized from the illness.

While the most common spread of salmonella is through meat, the increased number of chickens as pets has led to an increase in the spread from live birds. Last December, 1,700 cases were linked to backyard flocks throughout 2020.

One way to avoid infection from the pets is to leave poultry outdoors. When caring for chickens requires them to come inside the house, it is important to keep the birds away from food preparation areas.

‘We have had chickens hatch in the house in the past using an incubator,’ said Donnie Gallagher, who raises Serama show chickens near Sandusky, Ohio. ‘The goal is to get them into the barn as soon as temperatures are safe to do so.’

While healthy-looking birds may appear safe at first, they can carry the infection and transmit the illness to vulnerable individuals such as children under 5 or adults above 65 with a weakened immune system. Chickens should be kept away from areas where the salmonella infection can spread to these populations, especially in vulnerable settings such as daycares, schools, hospitals or nursing homes.

Additionally, those tending to their flock should wear a separate set of clothing to handle chickens, wash the coops with chemical disinfectants and make sure to wash their hands after working around the birds.

While the opportunity to snuggle with the birds may seem appealing, staying safe can prevent the infection from spreading to those who may not be able to battle salmonella.

‘Backyard poultry projects can be fun for the whole family, when operating under safe and monitored conditions,’ said Emily Shoop, a Penn State extension educator who focuses on the poultry science field. ‘By all means, hold, talk to, spend time with and enjoy your backyard flocks. Just be sure to wash your hands, and please don’t kiss your chickens.’

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Erie Times E-Edition Article-Rejecting meritocracy clashes with nation’s basic premises

Posted by M. C. on August 8, 2021

It is a virtue of meritocracy that it produces inequality. ‘You need,’ Wooldridge writes, ‘above-average rewards to induce people to engage in … self-sacrifice and risk-taking. Reduce the rewards that accrue to outstanding talent and you reduce the amount of talent available to society as a whole.’

Follow the link below to view the article. Rejecting meritocracy clashes with nation’s basic premises https://erietimes-pa-app.newsmemory.com/?publink=1c96bd1de_1345e9c

Rejecting meritocracy clashes with nation’s basic premises

‘Even young Mozart had to practise.’ – Adrian Wooldridge WASHINGTON – This cultural moment is defined by the peculiar idea that America has such a surplus of excellence, it can dispense with something that should be rejected as inequitable – rigorous competition to identify merit. Progressives are recoiling from the idea that propelled humanity’s ascent to modernity: the principle that people are individuals first and primarily, so individual rights should supplant rights attached to group membership.

Progressives’ unease with society measuring merit when allocating opportunity and rewards is discordant with the nation’s premises. And rejecting meritocracy at a time when China – the United States’ strongest geopolitical rival ever – is intensifying its embrace of it is ‘an act of civilisational suicide,’ Adrian Wooldridge warns.

In his book ‘The Aristocracy of Talent,’ the Economist’s political editor and Bagehot columnist argues that in pre-modern societies ‘the most important economic resource was not the brain inside your head but the land under your feet.’ Today, some anti-modern progressives are wary of intelligence because it is an engine of inequality.

So they attack selective public schools that base admissions on standardized tests. All uses of such tests, and Advanced Placement high school classes, and other sorting procedures are stigmatized because they produce disparate outcomes, which supposedly reveal ‘systemic racism.’ That dangerous dogma collides with this fact: Substantial cognitive stratification is inevitable in modern, information-intensive societies. As Wooldridge says, there cannot be sustained economic growth without meritocracy.

Pascal said, ‘We do not choose as captain of a ship the most highly born of those aboard.’ Thomas Paine said hereditary legislators would be as absurd as a ‘hereditary mathematician.’ And Wooldridge says, ‘Most of us would hesitate before flying with a pilot who had been chosen by lottery.’

He says Martin Luther’s greatest contribution to modernity was not Protestantism but competition: Schism meant that faith factions had ‘to improve their performance or lose their market share.’ Meritocracy, feudalism’s antithesis, was wielded by the French Revolution as a hammer to smash feudalism’s remnants: The 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen declared all citizens ‘equally admissible’ to all public ‘offices and employments … with no other distinction than that of their virtues and talents.’ As Wooldridge says, Enlightenment thinkers, aiming to match ‘talent to opportunity and knowledge to power,’ stressed the difference between natural aristocracies of talents and artificial aristocracies of breeding and inheritance.

Some progressives, who are more interested in minimizing inequality than maximizing opportunity, insist that not even industriousness makes an individual deserving is because it is an inherited trait. However, less loopy progressives rightly warn that there can be inherited hierarchies in meritocratic societies. America does fall short of Thomas Jefferson’s hope for ‘culling’ talent ‘from every condition of our people.’ SAT prep classes are not models of social diversity; parents are conscientious (this is not a vice) about transmitting family advantages to their children.

The answer, however, is to improve the culling, not to jettison the aspiration on the ground that all metrics of merit must be unfair. A first step would be to rescue children from uneducated educators of the sort who natter about ‘racist’ arithmetic and the ‘myth’ that some students are more arithmetically gifted than others.

Wooldridge reminds us that the ancient Greeks contrasted government by the best (aristocracy) with government by the richest and best-connected (oligarchy). Although the idea of aristocracy grates on democratic sensibilities, in the modern age a true aristocracy, meaning the ascendency of the talented, should be an aspiration. It need not mean an entrenched class insulated from the churning of competition. Indeed, it cannot mean that: In a society of careers truly open to talents, a real aristocracy will be constantly weeded and refreshed by upward – and downward – mobility driven by competition.

America, as Wooldridge writes, was ‘born meritocratic.’ Meritocracy is as American as immigration, which predisposes Americans to believe in ‘self-made men’ (a phrase used by Henry Clay in 1832). Meritocracy is as American as the frontier, where life ‘on the edge of the civilized world encouraged self-reliance.’

It is a virtue of meritocracy that it produces inequality. ‘You need,’ Wooldridge writes, ‘above-average rewards to induce people to engage in … self-sacrifice and risk-taking. Reduce the rewards that accrue to outstanding talent and you reduce the amount of talent available to society as a whole.’

Meritocracy, Wooldridge says, ‘is the closest thing we have today to a universal ideology.’ It, like many other good things, must, however, be saved from today’s profoundly retrogressive progressivism.

Contact George Will at georgewill@washpost.com.

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , | 1 Comment »

The Real Reason US is Provoking China – With RPI’s Daniel McAdams

Posted by M. C. on August 7, 2021

Could lobbyists in Washington be working deliberately to provoke a new arms race for the sake of profits? Daniel McAdams of the Ron Paul Institute joins Rick Sanchez to discuss the flood of missiles, aircraft and warships with which Washington is eagerly arming its Pacific allies: 


Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Central Planners Don’t Have A Clue, So Don’t Trust The Fed

Posted by M. C. on August 7, 2021

Central planning always fails, without exception. Civilization is never created from a blueprint developed in the imaginations of a few elitists. In fact, it’s the exact opposite. Civilization is always destroyed by central planners. So why do people constantly find themselves suffering under the yolk of utopians, when the only possible endgame is failure?

Central Planning = distortion and disaster

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Snowden joins battle against iPhone photo-scanning plan as Apple insults privacy activists as ‘screeching voices of the minority’ — RT World News

Posted by M. C. on August 7, 2021

“No matter how well-intentioned [Apple] is rolling out mass surveillance to the entire world with this. Make no mistake: if they can scan for kiddie porn today, they can scan for anything tomorrow,” he tweeted on Thursday night. “They turned a trillion dollars of devices into iNarcs – *without asking.*”

If Apple admits to its spying, it’s evil twin Google likely has already been at work without mentioning it.Time to start using that real camera again.

You are using a VPN and Firefox, Duckduckgo or Startpage…right?

https://www.rt.com/news/531389-apple-petition-privacy-snowden/

NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden has endorsed a petition against Apple’s plan to scan every iPhone user’s photos, calling it an assault on privacy. The company insisted its intention is only to root out child sexual abuse.

The letter, published on the platform Github on Friday is signed by security and privacy experts, cryptographers, researchers, academics, legal experts and ordinary consumers, united in condemnation of Apple’s “privacy-invasive content scanning technology.”

If you have a @github account, you can join me in co-signing the first letter uniting security & privacy experts, researchers, professors, policy advocates, and consumers against @Apple‘s planned moves against all of our privacy.https://t.co/QIb1TwJE0C— Edward Snowden (@Snowden) August 6, 2021

While acknowledging that efforts to combat child exploitation and abuse are “almost unquestionably well-intentioned,” the signers say that Apple’s proposal to constantly monitor and scan everyone’s photos – and alert authorities if its AI-driven algorithm tags them as criminal – “introduces a backdoor that threatens to undermine fundamental privacy protections for all users of Apple products.”

They warn that the technology has the potential to bypass any end-to-end encryption that would normally safeguard the user’s privacy – something Apple has long been promoting as a major feature of its software ecosystem.

Apple’s plan to roll out the scanning program in the US was leaked on Thursday via the Financial Times. It immediately raised eyebrows among cybersecurity researchers and privacy advocates – including Snowden, who became a household name in 2013 after blowing the whistle on the National Security Agency’s warrantless surveillance of Americans.

“No matter how well-intentioned [Apple] is rolling out mass surveillance to the entire world with this. Make no mistake: if they can scan for kiddie porn today, they can scan for anything tomorrow,” he tweeted on Thursday night. “They turned a trillion dollars of devices into iNarcs – *without asking.*”

The letter he shared contains quotes from the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT), and the Open Privacy Research Society, as well as several prominent advocates and researchers.

They all urged Apple to halt the deployment of the proposed technology “immediately” and reaffirm their commitment to user privacy and encryption.

I know, it sounds nuts. But ten years ago I would have said “running a local scanner on your device’s photo library even when photos aren’t shared” sounds nuts. And yet here we are.— Matthew Green (@matthew_d_green) August 6, 2021

Judging by the content of an internal memo sent on Friday by vice-president for software Sebastien Marineau-Mes, however, Apple is doubling down on the project – and seeking to motivate employees with a letter of praise insulting the critics.

“We’ve seen many positive responses today. We know some people have misunderstandings, and more than a few are worried about the implications, but we will continue to explain and detail the features so people understand what we’ve built,” Marineau-Mes wrote in the memo, which was reprinted by 9to5Mac on Friday.

He then appends the note Apple received from Marita Rodriguez, an executive with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), saying he found it “incredibly motivating, and hope that you will as well.”

Apple distributed an internal memo today which referred to pushback against its new content surveillance measures as “the screeching voices of the minority.” I have nothing to add. pic.twitter.com/6R9moiekyN— Nadim Kobeissi (@kaepora) August 6, 2021

“We know that the days to come will be filled with the screeching voices of the minority. Our voices will be louder,” Rodriguez wrote, after saying that NCMEC is “SO PROUD” of everyone at Apple and “the incredible decisions you have made in the name of prioritizing child protection.”

Apple has previously defended the encrypted nature of its operating systems, famously going to court in 2016 to fight the FBI demand for a ‘backdoor’ to the iPhone of the suspect in the San Bernardino, California terrorist shooting rampage. In its legal briefs, the company said the US government was demanding something they didn’t have and would be “too dangerous” for them to create.

The FBI later managed to unlock the phone, reportedly using an Israeli spy tool, but found nothing of use. Last month, it emerged that another Israeli spy tool, Pegasus, has been used to hack tens of thousands of iPhones around the world – including those of journalists, dissidents and even heads of state.

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

The richest and most war-mongering nation on Earth is still addicted to bombing poor, defenseless nations — RT Op-ed

Posted by M. C. on August 7, 2021

Kill anything that moves

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/531316-us-bombs-defenceless-nations/

Maitreya Bhakal is an Indian commentator who writes about China, India, the US, and global issues. Follow him on Twitter @MaitreyaBhakal A nation-state version of a psychopath, the US refuses to give up its addiction to bombing innocent people. In just over a month, it’s bombed Syria, Iraq, Somalia and Afghanistan – and shows no signs of developing a conscience. 

Kill anything that moves

March 15, 1968 was a normal day in America. The sun was shining. The birds were chirping. Race riots in Mississippi were entering their fifth day or so. And at the other end of the globe, in Vietnam, soldiers of the Americal Division’s Charlie Company, 1st Battalion, 20th Infantry Regiment, were being briefed by their commanding officer, Captain Ernest Medina, about the exploits of the next day, which would later be dubbed the “My Lai massacre” – where 500 unarmed Vietnamese civilians were systematically butchered in over four hours, not counting a lunch break the soldiers took in the middle of the carnage. The orders were clear and explicit: the soldiers were to kill every single human being, burn all houses, kill all animals, destroy all food supplies and poison all wells. 

As the briefing progressed, one incident stuck in the mind of artillery forward observer James Flynn, which he would recall years later. A soldier, whose name has been lost to history, expressed some apprehension about the wide-ranging nature of the orders. “Are we supposed to kill women and children?” he asked naively. 

“Kill everything that moves,” came the reply.

Kill everything that moves. This same phrase would be repeated almost verbatim two years later by none other than Henry Kissinger himself while relaying US leader Richard Nixon’s orders: “A massive bombing campaign in Cambodia. Anything that flies on anything that moves.”

My Lais and my truths

That the popular US media is allowed to discuss this event is not exactly praiseworthy, nor some sign of speaking truth to power, as they claim. The reason why the My Lai massacre was allowed to enter the popular US imagination was to hide America’s much larger war crimes. As Nick Turse points out in his award-winning book Kill Anything that Moves: The Real American War in Vietnam: “Today, histories of the Vietnam War regularly discuss war crimes or civilian suffering only in the context of a single incident: the My Lai massacre… Even as that one event has become the subject of numerous books and articles, all the other atrocities perpetrated by US soldiers have essentially vanished from popular memory.”

The strategy worked. And it continues to work to this day. After all, what better way to distract attention from your larger crimes than focus attention on your smaller ones? As a bonus, this also allows you to portray yourself as an enabler and respecter of “free speech” and “open debate”. 

Bomber barbarians

Yes – America loves killing anything that moves. Like the nation-state version of the psychopathic serial murderer, it loves bombing weak, poor, defenseless nations that cannot fight back – nations that have done no harm to it and pose no threat to it.

The US regime wouldn’t dare touch North Korea, of course, because it possesses nuclear weapons and can fight back. America killed Muammar Gaddafi’s nuclear weapons program, and then killed the man himself as soon as they got the opportunity less than a decade later (he was sodomized and then murdered in the open by pro-US forces). Iraq was attacked not because it had WMDs – but because it didn’t. The US regime knew it couldn’t defend itself, and went in for the kill. Syria would have probably become another Iraq if not for Russia, who Syria explicitly invited in to counter the twin terrorist threats of Islamic State (IS/formerly ISIS) and the US (via its proxies). 

See the rest here

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

You Were Warned: Automakers Team Up With Biden To Force Electric Cars On Consumers – Issues & Insights

Posted by M. C. on August 7, 2021

A Manhattan Institute study found that “Optimists forecast that the number of EVs in the world will rise from today’s nearly 4 million to 400 million in two decades. A world with 400 million EVs by 2040 would decrease global oil demand by barely 6%.”

That’s to say nothing of the fact that battery manufacturing at the scale needed would have its own huge environmental impacts, and the phenomenal increase in demand for electricity would come at a time when Biden is also trying to force power companies to abandon fossil fuels.

For climate alarmists, this is a dream worth pursuing. For automakers, it signals their complete surrender to government autocrats. For everyone else, it will just be a nightmare.

https://issuesinsights.com/2021/08/06/you-were-warned-automakers-team-up-with-biden-to-force-electric-cars-on-consumers/

I & I Editorial Board

n eight years, half of American car buyers will be forced to purchase overpriced, underperforming electric cars they don’t want, courtesy of the federal government and a compliant auto industry. That, at least, is what President Joe Biden announced at the White House on Thursday, and it’s just as we predicted in this space three months ago.

With a wave of his pen, Biden ordered that 50% of new cars and trucks sold by 2030 are to be electric. Since the auto companies already have their 2022 model year cars in production, that means they have less than eight years to figure out how to comply with the most massive, disruptive, and anti-consumer mandate ever to come out of Washington.

The automakers have only themselves to blame for that. As we noted in early May, they’d already caved to the green police and announced ambitious plans to electrify their fleets, even though consumers have little interest in buying battery-powered cars.

Despite massive taxpayer rebates handed out to electric car buyers, a multitude of subsidized recharging stations, and the constant talk about how electric automobiles will save the planet, sales of plug-ins accounted for a tiny 2% of all cars sold in the U.S. last year.

GM sold twice as many of its gas-guzzling Silverado pickups in 2020 as the combined sales of every company’s electric cars. Electric vehicles, in other words, are still very much a niche product. And for good reason. Owning one means hunting for recharging stations, waiting interminably for the battery to recharge, and confining yourself to short trips – shorter still if you have to turn on the A/C or the heater.

It’s the impracticality of these cars that explains why a fifth of electric vehicle owners in California reported trading them in for automobiles with good-old internal combustion engines.

Given this strong consumer disinterest, the only way automakers could justify dumping massive amounts of money into electric car R&D was on the promise that the government would require Americans to buy them. We said that:

If consumers continue to flock to the remaining gas-powered cars available to them, the only way to stop such ‘misbehavior’ would be to have the government outlaw the sale of such cars.

Sure enough, that’s just what happened on Thursday, when in coordination with the White House, General Motors, Ford, and Stellantis (the company that now owns what’s left of Chrysler) announced “their shared aspiration to achieve sales of 40-50% of annual U.S. volumes of electric vehicle by 2030 in order to move the nation closer to a zero-emissions future.”

Honda, BMW, Volkswagen, and Volvo issued a separate statement singing the praises of Biden’s draconian mandate, as did the beleaguered dictator in training also known as California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who said that “the climate emergency demands no less.”

These auto giants admit full well that a “dramatic shift” the electric car sales from 2% today to 50% in a relative blink of an eye won’t be driven by consumer demand.

In fact, the Big Three U.S. automakers state that this massive transition “can be achieved only by the timely deployment of the full suite of electrification policies committed to by the (Biden) administration in the Build Back Better Plan, including purchase incentives, a comprehensive charging network of sufficient density to support the millions of vehicles these targets represent, investments in R&D, and incentives to expand the electric vehicle manufacturing and supply chains in the United States.”

In other words, massive taxpayer subsidies. Biden wants to dump $174 billion – with a B – to pay for subsidies, grants, and tax incentives to car buyers, to build electric charging stations, and to replace the entire federal fleet of cars and trucks, including all those used by the already financially desperate U.S. Postal Service.

So, what Biden and the industry are teaming up to accomplish will not only harm consumers, who will be denied the full range of choices they have now, but also taxpayers, who will have to pay for an unprecedented experiment in industrial policy.

And for what? What will all this disruption, inconvenience, cost, and taxpayer money gain us?

Absolutely nothing.

Even if Biden were to achieve this dream, working arm-in-arm in fascistic fashion with automakers, it would barely make a dent in global oil demand and have no measurable impact on global temperatures.

A Manhattan Institute study found that “Optimists forecast that the number of EVs in the world will rise from today’s nearly 4 million to 400 million in two decades. A world with 400 million EVs by 2040 would decrease global oil demand by barely 6%.”

That’s to say nothing of the fact that battery manufacturing at the scale needed would have its own huge environmental impacts, and the phenomenal increase in demand for electricity would come at a time when Biden is also trying to force power companies to abandon fossil fuels.

For climate alarmists, this is a dream worth pursuing. For automakers, it signals their complete surrender to government autocrats. For everyone else, it will just be a nightmare.

— Written by the I&I Editorial Board

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Murphy Explains Bidenomics | Mises Institute

Posted by M. C. on August 7, 2021

See link for video.

https://mises.org/library/murphy-explains-bidenomics

From climate policy to stimulus to unemployment, Prof. Murphy takes a detailed look at the many practical and theoretical problems of Joe Biden’s economic agenda. Presented at Mises University 2021. Download the slides from this lecture at Mises.org/MU21_PPT_27. Recorded at the Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama, on 22 July 2021

Author:

Contact Robert P. Murphy

Robert P. Murphy is a Senior Fellow with the Mises Institute. He is the author of numerous books: Contra Krugman: Smashing the Errors of America’s Most Famous Keynesian; Chaos Theory; Lessons for the Young Economist; Choice: Cooperation, Enterprise, and Human Action; The Politically Incorrect Guide to Capitalism; Understanding Bitcoin (with Silas Barta), among others. He is also host of The Bob Murphy Show.

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

RPI ALERT: Major Israeli Strike on Iran Imminent?

Posted by M. C. on August 7, 2021

https://mailchi.mp/ronpaulinstitute/israeliran?e=4e0de347c8

Dear Friends:

On April 6th, 2017, the Ron Paul Institute received credible information from its network that a US missile attack on Syria by President Trump was imminent. Just a couple of hours after we put out this urgent update, missiles were launched by Trump on Syria under the false pretense that they were retaliation for a Syrian government airstrike on civilians. That claim has since been proven bogus – cooked up by US government spooks and amplified by the media.

We reported it to you in real time, where we were told by a source that the “TLAMs were being loaded.” Sadly, we were right.

We are currently hearing from our sources that Israel may be planning a major “retaliatory” strike on Iran this weekend over the alleged involvement of Iran in the drone attack on a Japanese-owned but Israeli-managed ship, in which a British citizen was killed.

It’s hardly an Iranian attack on Tel Aviv, but the new government in Israel has been ratcheting up the rhetoric for days, recently claiming that it is “ready to attack Iran alone” over the alleged incident.

We are told it may happen over the weekend.

The Israeli defense minister is on the warpath, repeating an endless Netanyahu talking point that Iranian nuclear weapons would be rolled out tomorrow, or in a week, or a few weeks, etc. The Israeli government is tenuously positioned, with recently dethroned Bibi breathing down its neck, so what better way to shore up domestic support – where the “left” parties are as hawkish as the “right” parties – than to launch a big attack on Iran?

That would solve the ongoing problem of US President Biden’s negotiations – even if half-hearted and fruitless –  with the Iranians over the return of the US to its commitment to the JCPOA (“Iran Deal”) the return to which Biden openly campaigned on. 

There is nothing that would excite Israel’s bipartisan “Amen Corner” in the Washington Beltway more than a reckless Israeli attack on Iran (over a minor incident not at all related to Israeli national interests) and an Iranian response, which must come considering the incoming Iranian government is politically obliged to defend the conservative voices of those who recently elected it.

And the pro-Israel fanatics in the Biden Administration seem to be facilitating the escalation. Indeed, our source informs us, this Israeli attack may have some coordinating help from its friends in the Pentagon.

Speaking of Pat Buchanan, once again he has it totally on the mark when he warns of a “Gulf of Tonkin incident” in the Gulf of Oman. Writing in an article Friday, he blows apart this bogus narrative: while the Israelis are hysterically trying to frame this as some kind of existential threat to their existence, in fact, as Buchanan writes, such a frontal assault by the incoming Iranian Administration would make no sense.

Writes Buchanan:  ‘We are confident that Iran conducted this attack,’ said Secretary of State Antony Blinken. ‘We are working with our partners to consider our next steps and consulting with governments inside the region and beyond on an appropriate response, which will be forthcoming.’Iran, however, has repeatedly denied that it ordered the attack.What makes the attack puzzling is its timing, as it occurred just days before the inauguration of the newly elected president of Iran, the ultraconservative hardliner Ebrahim Raisi.Query: Would Raisi have ordered a provocative attack on an Israeli-managed vessel, just days before taking office, when his highest priority is a lifting of the ‘maximum pressure’ sanctions imposed on his country by former President Donald Trump? Why?Would Raisi put at risk his principal diplomatic goal, just to get even with Israel for some earlier pinprick strike in the tit-for-tat war in which Iran and Israel have been engaged for years? Again, why? Indeed: why?  We are providing this information to you, again, to let you know how things work inside the Washington war machine. Conflict is always good from the prospective of those who make millions off the rest of us to keep the tension high. High enough to justify more weapons sales but not too high where it all boils over.

This may boil over. Israel has been bombing Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, etc with impunity for years, and even its very friendly ally Russia is getting annoyed by Tel Aviv’s relentless attacks on its neighbors.

So keep an eye open. And, as ever, do NOT trust the mainstream media. Information from our sources may not play out as we have warned. And in fact we would be happy to be wrong, as there is nothing to be gained by Israel, the US, Iran, or any country in the region from a major war.

Our view is that were the US to disengage from the Middle East, Israel would have to face the music that it must find a way to get along with its neighbors – and the Palestinians who are its closest neighbors – and that would be good not only for the neighborhood, but for Israel as well.

The problem is not solely Israel or Palestine or Iran. The problem is, as Americans, is US foreign policy, as a major enabler for conflict for the benefit of special interests.

Pray for peace.
Sincerely yours,

Daniel McAdams
Executive Director
Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Control-The good kind

Posted by M. C. on August 6, 2021

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »