MCViewPoint

Opinion from a Libertarian ViewPoint

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Congressional Omnibus is Like a Bad Hollywood Movie Sequel

Posted by M. C. on March 26, 2024

by Ron Paul

Unfortunately, this latest sequel is as bad as the previous ones, as the American people are left with a massive $1.2 trillion dollar spending package to add to our already $34 trillion in debt. Military spending will, of course, be increased yet again, as the military-industrial complex demands more of our wealth to feed its ever-increasing appetite.

https://ronpaulinstitute.org/congressional-omnibus-is-like-a-bad-hollywood-movie-sequel

This weekend’s late-night spending vote in Congress seems like another in an endless series of sequels to a bad suspense movie. Just at the brink of “disaster,” just before the stroke of midnight, Congress pulls off a miracle and passes an omnibus bill to save us from a “government shutdown!”

The heroes have saved the day!

Unfortunately, this latest sequel is as bad as the previous ones, as the American people are left with a massive $1.2 trillion dollar spending package to add to our already $34 trillion in debt. Military spending will, of course, be increased yet again, as the military-industrial complex demands more of our wealth to feed its ever-increasing appetite. And if this military spending increase is not enough, Congressional leadership is promising another huge supplemental bill to further fuel proxy wars in Ukraine and Gaza – with some money to provoke China as well.

Republicans like to talk a good game about reining in spending – especially during election season – but as we learned with this “compromise” and all previous “compromises, it’s all talk. At the end of all the dramatic warnings about shutting the government down, we are left with a Washington-style compromise, meaning the leadership of both parties gets to throw anything and everything they want into the massive bill. Because it is only presented to the rank and file at the last moment before “disaster,” none of the Members get a chance to even read it, much less shape it through amendments and debate.

The Republican House leadership promised the Members 72 hours to read any new bill before a vote, but they broke their promise without hesitation. Members would not have the chance to read the more than 1,000 page bill, which was worked out in secret behind closed doors

See the rest here

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Taxing The Rich To Help The Poor Or To Send It Overseas? Thomas Sowell

Posted by M. C. on March 26, 2024

Some years ago, in my syndicated column, I challenged anyone to name any economist, of any school of thought, who had actually advocated a “trickle down” theory. No one quoted any economist, politician or person in any other walk of life who had ever advocated such a theory, even though many readers named someone who claimed that someone else had advocated it, without being able to quote anything actually said by that someone else.

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Free Stuff

Posted by M. C. on March 26, 2024

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Joe Biden Is Now Targeting 82-Year-Old Veterans

Posted by M. C. on March 25, 2024

The Biden administration is trying to send an 82-year veteran to prison for life for the crime of repeating ‘Russian misinformation.’ The scariest, most important criminal case you’ve probably never heard of.

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Affordable Housing – Government Topples Realtors

Posted by M. C. on March 25, 2024

We can be assured, this is not the last private industry that will take a hit.   Hospitality is likely the next playground to be hit by the bullies.   Having fun needs to be relegated to the elite with money, not the plebes. 

by Helena

Posted on by Helena

Houses are not affordable.  Despite all the best efforts of government to control the value of your property, they have continually failed.   Prices continue to rise.   The culprit?   Realtors.   Apparently, the agency fees to represent the buyer and seller transaction have caused the real estate boom that has made housing unaffordable.   How much truth is in this new indoctrination?

In 1940 the realtor commission was 5%.   In 1980, the realtor commission rose to 6%.   The same 6% it is today.   But somehow, despite 40 years of paying the same commission, The Economist powers that be, have decided this isn’t equitable.   It isn’t fair.   And therefore, elimination of this fee will reduce the cost of a home and make it affordable…   That would be the logic.   But what is the reality?

Homeowners have the option of selling without a realtor.  They also have the option of using the flat fee companies..   Or they had the option of utilizing the expertise of a realtor who has passed rigorous courses and exams on contract law, title law, foreclosures, and inspections.  A choice.  That choice is being removed by the Powers.  Why?

HINT:  it has absolutely nothing to do with affordable housing.  

When you remove an industries ability to charge a fee and make money, you are attacking the industry – not helping the poor.   Let’s say doctors are no longer allowed to charge a fee, does that mean healthcare costs will drop?   No.  It means there will be no more doctors and healthcare won’t exist.  For the Real Estate industry that translates to  homeowners being left to mitigate scams, fraud, theft, liability, and corruption.   And the tight housing market will become that much more tight as homeowners decide to renovate instead of move.

Builders reap the benefit.

Builders can dangle the carrot of discounted interest rates.  They run the show. When no agent is there to represent your best interest – for free – you pay top dollar.   And who is selling at top dollar?   The Hedge Funds that scooped up entire neighborhoods at a 2% fixed rate of interest and now want to divest their inventory – charging a ‘discounted’ interest rate of 5.5% when the market is 7.25%.   Now you are buying more home for the same price because of the “interest rate” – not because of realtor fees.

How much more home?   A $500,000 home at 7.25% costs $3,411 per month.   At 5.5% – you can now afford a $600,000 home for the same monthly payment.   Who wins?   The BUILDER!

Did eliminating the realtor bring down home values?   No.  It moved the buyers from existing homes to new homes that are sitting vacant.

And the headlines read:  2024 Primed To Be Stellar Year For Homebuilders.   Realtors?   Not so much.

The realtor settlement for repaying homeowners deemed to have been over-charged/gouged by 6% over the last decade – is $418 million.   Number of potential homeowners eligible for a cut?   50 million.  Amount that will go to legal representation to collect any money?   35%.   Which is somehow NOT deemed excessive.

According to The Economist, the realtor commission is a racket, a mob rule that gouges the buyer and the seller.   The average estimated savings for a median home sale – $10,000.   Example:   a house selling for $500,000 would incur a commission fee of $30,000.  A negotiated commission at 4% would save $10,000.    By comparison, a reduced interest rate from 7.25% to 4.25% would save $11,400.  If the Federal Reserve dropped interest rates to the level they were prior to Brandon, the annual savings would be $17,220.

See the rest here

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Asian-Americans are Overachievers, This is Why | Thomas Sowell

Posted by M. C. on March 25, 2024

“Because they work”

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

From Boom To Bust: Doug Casey on Fading Enthusiasm for Electric Vehicles

Posted by M. C. on March 25, 2024

They forgot that Tesla is run by a genius who designed an electric car from the ground up with lots of technical innovations. GM, Ford, and the other legacy companies are run by ESG-oriented suits whose first consideration is kowtowing to their HR and compliance departments.

Doug Casey: The shareholders and customers take a back seat to legislators and regulators. It’s perverse.

by Doug Casey

International Man: Outside of Tesla, fewer and fewer people want electric vehicles (EVs). Other car companies have spent billions producing EVs that buyers don’t trust. Why are they developing products their customers clearly don’t want?

Doug Casey: Perhaps they thought that if Tesla, an undercapitalized start-up run by an eccentric with no auto manufacturing experience, could become a trillion-dollar company, then how hard could it be? They forgot that Tesla is run by a genius who designed an electric car from the ground up with lots of technical innovations. GM, Ford, and the other legacy companies are run by ESG-oriented suits whose first consideration is kowtowing to their HR and compliance departments.

Apple was working on an EV, but they just pulled the plug on it after dropping US $10 billion. Building a good EV isn’t as easy as Elon made it look.

There’s nothing wrong with the concept of electric vehicles. The problem—as with most economic problems in today’s world—is the State. The government has basically decided that fossil fuels are evil, and so are the vehicles that burn them. They hate fossil fuels for all kinds of specious and hysterical reasons that mostly revolve around “saving” the planet. Most of which are nonsensical, at least if you want to have an industrial civilization.

The kind of people who go into government hate cars and the freedom that they give the common man.

That’s why they want to put everybody in 15-minute cities, where you presumably won’t need real cars, just EV golf carts.

The federal government has lots of legal mandates designating what kind of cars manufacturers can and cannot make. Average fleet mileage specifications are a major factor in determining what kind of cars we have. But governments are going farther, essentially trying to ban most conventional ICE (internal combustion engine) cars by 2035 or even 2030. Their mandates against ICEs have skewed production towards electronic vehicles.

At the same time, they’ve offered large tax advantages to consumers, getting them to buy EVs that they’d otherwise avoid. So, although EVs have merit for certain places and conditions and have a place in the automotive world, government pushing and pulling creates huge distortions in how people act.

International Man: Last year, Ford lost $4.7 billion on its EV models, and it’s projected that this year, it could lose up to $5.5 billion.

The Wall Street Journal estimates that Ford could actually boost its profits by 50% by ditching EVs altogether. It seems Ford and other companies could care less about serving their shareholders or their customers.

What is really going on here?

Doug Casey: The shareholders and customers take a back seat to legislators and regulators. It’s perverse.

See the rest here

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

It’s Not Theft…

Posted by M. C. on March 25, 2024

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

I Have Been Called Worse

Posted by M. C. on March 25, 2024

“If you want government to intervene domestically, you’re a liberal.
If you want government to intervene overseas, you’re a conservative.
If you want government to intervene everywhere, you’re a moderate.
If you don’t want government to intervene anywhere, you’re an extremist.”
 – Joe Sobran

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

The Principled Cannot Convince the Irrational

Posted by M. C. on March 23, 2024

Smedley Butler’s words are often cited by anti-imperialists, though he is an example of the cynical veteran, waiting until after he served his warmasters heroically for decades to write a book about his deeds which made their imperialism possible at all. George W. Bush paints portraits of his victims while in retirement, seemingly delusional with his legacy.

https://libertarianinstitute.org/articles/the-principled-cannot-convince-the-irrational

by Kym Robinson

ordinary and extraordinary brain concept idea with human heads..

No matter how brutal an event, there will be those who can justify, rationalize, or spin a positive narrative. Real and imagined injustices inspire reactions that lead to more injustice, creating a spiral of revenge. Or a group can decide that it is superior, righteous by default, and has the right to claim territory in order to thrive. Outside observers can grapple with favoring one party over others, claiming that it was a “lesser evil.” Despite any pretense or deceptions, most violent actors do the irrationally vile for little reason other than self service or with inhuman distance. Trying to argue against such irrationality with reason and rationality can be a fool’s errand. Decency and moral dignity are seldom in consideration for those who would murder on a large scale. This is the prevailing predicament for those who oppose war and injustice with principles, trying to find compassion and empathy within those who appear callous, indifferent, or even deranged.

Despite this, we often argue and appeal with reason to those who may not see the world as we do. They may understand it differently, seeking a particular utopia or a piece of the imperial pie for themselves. They do not care about how many “eggs are broken” to achieve such an omelette. So how do we find common ground?

It seems that it is only after the fact that many of the killers and their masters come to understand the demented business that they made possible; rarely do many protest and object early on. It was only decades afterwards when Robert McNamara exhibited a degree of remorse, or years later when veterans may experience moral injury that leads them to challenge their original mission. Smedley Butler’s words are often cited by anti-imperialists, though he is an example of the cynical veteran, waiting until after he served his warmasters heroically for decades to write a book about his deeds which made their imperialism possible at all. George W. Bush paints portraits of his victims while in retirement, seemingly delusional with his legacy.

Those labelled conscientious objectors or “draft dodgers” tend to be viewed as cowards, ridiculed because they would not join the brave (nearly always men) who march into the meat grinder of war. In 1918, Reverend John Kovalsky and three other men were attacked by a mob of around three hundred in the town of Christopher, Illinois. The mob violently tarred and feathered the four men, and the reverend was forced to kiss the American flag because of disloyal language. Despite being fined by law enforcement, a mob saw it fit to humiliate and punish the men for disloyalty. The four disloyal men needed to show fidelity to a government that was waging war for human rights and free expression; because the four challenged the war and government with words, both the law and a mob punished them.

“The country was in peril; he was jeopardising his traditional rights of freedom and independence by daring to exercise them.”- Joseph Heller, Catch 22

Such acts of mob violence are often looked back on as moments of group insanity. Yet time and time again the world over we see such displays of unreason and violence tear away individual rights.

See the rest here

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »