MCViewPoint

Opinion from a Libertarian ViewPoint

Walter Block: What Hans-Hermann Hoppe gets wrong about Javier Milei

Posted by M. C. on April 30, 2025

Is Milei perfect? No. No one who puts his pants on one leg at a time can attain such a status. But he is far and away the best thing that has happened to the movement for liberty and economic freedom in a long, long time. All libertarians should tip their hats to him and wish him God speed. No, correction: the entire world should do so.

By Walter E Block

The president of his country, Javier Milei, is the last best hope for Argentina, and not only in terms of its economics, which promises to be profound. He also introduces for the first time in a long time a sense of ethics and propriety to that neck of the woods. Totalitarianism and socialism are simply morally wrong, not merely only non-efficacious, ineffective, uneconomical. In addition he constitutes a healthy shot in the arm for the psychological well-being of the citizens of this nation. He demonstrates, over and over again, the personal mental benefits of freedom, justice and private property rights. In so doing, he improves their well-being in many other dimensions as well, and immeasurably so.

But the benefits of his efforts will not be limited, by any means, to Argentina alone. And not only to all of Central and South America either. The entire world will be his oyster. If he can rescue Argentina with free enterprise, and so far he is on a direct path to do so, the entire world will be more likely to accept laissez faire capitalism than ever before.

One would think that with so much at stake, all advocates of libertarianism would salute him, would thank him, would congratulate him, would support him, would organize ticker-tape parades in his honor.

If you thought that, you are due for a rude awakening. Hans-Hermann Hoppe, a leading libertarian, instead, cocks a snook at this miracle worker. (I use that phrase advisedly. What else can we call it; imagine, radical free enterprise emanating from the very top of the political system!). Hoppe gives Milei the back of his hand. He criticizes him for doing too little, too late. Why, the president of Argentina has been in power for serval months now, and this nation has still has not yet reached the Galt’s Gulch level of free market capitalism of Ayn Rand’s “Atlas Shrugged” opines Hoppe, in effect.

This world class Austrian economist and libertarian theoretician simply does not understand how difficult it is to turn around a country mired in inflation, socialism, fascism, egalitarianism, wokeism, interventionism, regulationism, price controls.

See the rest here

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Alissa Zinovievna

Posted by M. C. on April 29, 2025

“She famously said, “When you realize that to produce, you must obtain permission from those who produce nothing;…”

History pictures

oSpndesrto1ig2hup4t3701aA i3a23m0ll1h514f89 8u Mt:r2tP20ic l  ·

On February 2, 1905, in St. Petersburg, the philosopher and writer Alissa Zinovievna, better known to the world of letters as Ayn Rand, was born.

She famously said, “When you realize that to produce, you must obtain permission from those who produce nothing; when you see that money flows to those who deal not in goods but in favors; when you notice that many become rich through bribery and influence rather than by their work, and that the laws do not protect you from them but, instead, they are protected from you; when you discover that corruption is rewarded and honesty becomes a form of self-sacrifice, then you can confidently say, without fear of being wrong, that your society is doomed.”

Her words, which touch on themes of power, corruption, and inequality, continue to resonate as a chilling prediction about the potential decline of society under certain conditions.

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | 1 Comment »

‘Are You Comfortable with Ukraine Becoming the Next Israel?’-Kyle Anzalone

Posted by M. C. on April 29, 2025

It’s great that Sen. Lee compared Kiev and Tel Aviv. After all, both are welfare queens with unstable borders, and both have major problems with their respective ethno-nationalists.

https://mailchi.mp/libertarianinstitute/this-week-at-the-libertarian-institute-olhmx6gn9t-5848831-7hv9eay4br-5850177?e=de2d0eded6

Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah had a very interesting post on X recently.

The lawmaker, who is opposed to sending more aid to Ukraine, asked whether Americans wanted the country to become “the next Israel,” noting that Kiev expects the United States to provide “long-term” (read “indefinite”) security assistance.

The statement is so interesting because it is an acknowledgement that Tel Aviv is heavily dependent on Washington – first and foremost for weapons and military aid, but also diplomatic cover for its violent, decades-long military occupation of Palestinian lands and property.

For years, top lawmakers have repeated a version of Joe Biden’s “If Israel did not exist, the US would have to invent it” line, suggesting Israel is crucial to US security, with some American lawmakers even asserting that Israel’s defense is more important than protecting the “homeland.”

See the rest here

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

The COVID Regime: Covid.gov & the US Government Finally Tell the Truth

Posted by M. C. on April 26, 2025

The World Health Organization, which early on echoed China’s false claims and helped suppress the lab-leak theory, now seeks binding international control over global health emergencies. The proposed WHO Pandemic Treaty would allow bureaucrats in Geneva to override local authority during pandemics, dictate national health policy, impose travel restrictions, and mandate medical interventions, all without the consent of the governed.

The Libertarian Party was the only political party to formally oppose this dangerous treaty and call for the United States to withdraw from the WHO.

From the Desk of the Chair
LP.ORG

Covid.gov, the US Government-run website dedicated for years to COVID-19 misinformation and outright lies, has just been altered to reflect numerous truths about the Covid regime. Finally, some semblance of accountability is present. However, let us never forget the sins of the past five years.
The first casualty of COVID-19 was truth. Support our fight to preserve it. >>>In late 2019, Dr. Li Wenliang, a young physician in Wuhan, China, warned colleagues about a strange new virus spreading through hospitals. He was arrested by the CCP and forced to sign a false confession, amidst accusations of disturbing the social order. In February 2020, just months later, Dr. Wenliang died from COVID-19.

Before his death, he shared a haunting statement that would become a cry for freedom.

“I think there should be more than one voice in a healthy society, and I don’t approve of using public power for excessive interference.”
It was a warning to the world. And instead of heeding it, the West embraced it.

Science played second fiddle to politics. Dissenting physicians were deplatformed, demonized, and fired. Even now, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, one of the most outspoken critics of the lockdown regime, has been vindicated and appointed to the NIH. This is a small but meaningful step toward restoring credibility to public health.

Public health policy was dictated not through dialogue, but decree. The media became a state-adjacent apparatus of enforcement. The people, once free citizens, were treated like inmates in Plato’s cave, where flickering shadows cast by central planners replaced truth, and anyone who turned toward the light was branded a threat.
Join us in defending individual freedom from global overreach >>>
The 2025 peer-reviewed Narrative Review of the COVID-19 Infodemic and Censorship in Healthcare confirms what many of us lived through. Governments and corporations coordinated to censor dissent, distort public perception, and monopolize scientific discourse. Social platforms became digital enforcement for the state. As the Twitter Files later revealed, U.S. agencies collaborated with tech companies to create a censorship-industrial complex that crushed dissent beneath the guise of “disinformation control.”

These tactics weren’t new. Only the scale was.
When the Spanish Flu killed over 675,000 Americans, the government didn’t mandate lockdowns, masks, or national emergency powers. Communities made decisions. People were treated as adults. In contrast, COVID-19 became a crisis of convenience. It was used to centralize control, crush individual liberties, and reorganize society without consent.

We were told to “trust the science,” while scientists were censored. We were told mandates would save lives, while lives were ruined. For a virus with a 99%+ survival rate for most, children were masked, silenced, and isolated. Schools were closed. Mental health deteriorated. Language development regressed.

Children, who faced the lowest risk, bore the highest burden, not from the virus, but from our response to it.
Pfizer, Moderna and others, shielded from liability, raked in billions. Their products were mandated under penalty of exclusion from work, travel, and public life. Yet, those who raised concerns, even respected doctors, were smeared as conspiracists. What wasn’t profitable was labeled misinformation.

Help us resist the next “emergency” power grab >>>
And still today, the architecture of emergency control remains. Powers granted under COVID were never fully rolled back. Bureaucrats discovered just how easy it is to take once-unthinkable actions and make them routine. We now live in a political environment where the next “emergency,” whether viral, digital, environmental, or financial, can and will be used to justify restrictions on every aspect of individual liberty.

The World Health Organization, which early on echoed China’s false claims and helped suppress the lab-leak theory, now seeks binding international control over global health emergencies. The proposed WHO Pandemic Treaty would allow bureaucrats in Geneva to override local authority during pandemics, dictate national health policy, impose travel restrictions, and mandate medical interventions, all without the consent of the governed.

The Libertarian Party was the only political party to formally oppose this dangerous treaty and call for the United States to withdraw from the WHO. Let us be clear: in 2020, the Libertarian Party failed to speak out as it should have. That silence was a black eye on our record, and we will not allow it to happen again.

Our resolution to oppose the WHO treaty reflects what should be common sense. Pandemic response must be local, voluntary, and subject to constitutional limits, not outsourced to foreign technocrats and corporate profiteers.

Governments never let a crisis go to waste. The next one is coming.Whether it’s a virus, a war, or a climate “emergency,” the formula remains the same.

Fear. Obedience. Power consolidation.

The question is not if this will happen again. It’s when. We must be ready. Not just to resist, but to reclaim what was taken.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

U.S. airstrikes have killed thousands of civilians, NYT Magazine investigation finds

Posted by M. C. on April 23, 2025

SIMON: The use of drone strikes and air support really increased considerably during the Obama administration and then continued in the Trump and Biden administrations.

https://www.npr.org/2021/12/25/1067966116/u-s-air-strikes-have-killed-thousands-of-civilians-nyt-magazine-investigation-fi

SCOTT SIMON, HOST:

Drone strikes are supposed to be precise – surgical is the word often used – to target terrorists and threats and avoid killing innocent civilians. But a deep investigation by the New York Times Magazine finds that U.S. airstrikes have killed thousands of civilians – including small children – in places that include Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan.

Investigative reporter Azmat Khan has spent the last five years reporting on U.S. military drone operations and airstrikes and civilian casualties and joins us now. Thank you so much for being with us.

AZMAT KHAN: Thank you for having me.

SIMON: The use of drone strikes and air support really increased considerably during the Obama administration and then continued in the Trump and Biden administrations. Please remind us why President Obama and others decided to emphasize drone strikes and air support.

KHAN: Absolutely. So this really came out of the discontent many Americans felt for what are now often described as the forever wars. And President Obama, you know, after the surge – which really didn’t turn things around in Afghanistan in the way that was expected as we sort of transitioned towards leaving the country – felt that there was still a need to maintain a presence there. But we didn’t want troops on the ground. And the way that we did that was often through air support – through airstrikes against not only the Taliban but ISIS, as well as air support for Iraqi and Afghan partners – Syrian partners – on the ground as they fought these groups.

SIMON: Yeah. Tell us some of some of what you found that – well, that stays with you in particular.

KHAN: You know, one particular memory that has stayed with me was visiting this hamlet in northern Syria called Tokhar, where nearly 200 people had sort of been sheltering in these houses during the worst of fighting and woke up around 3 a.m. one night in July of 2016 to these homes crumbling on top of them. And while the United States admitted that between seven and 24 civilians were killed in the document I obtained about the investigation into that airstrike, what I found on the ground was at least 120 civilians had died. You know, what I did was I – through the Freedom of Information Act, I got more than 1,500 assessments that the military had conducted into claims of civilian casualties, most of which they deemed noncredible. And one of the largest patterns I found was that they had failed often to detect the presence of civilians before an airstrike.

SIMON: That’s an intelligence failure.

KHAN: Yes, that’s an intelligence failure. I also found the misidentification of targets.

See the rest here

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Cut(?) Taxes

Posted by M. C. on April 23, 2025

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Is Washington Occupied Territory? – The Debrief

Posted by M. C. on April 23, 2025

“The American official overseeing White House policy toward both Israel and Iran inside the National Security Council formerly worked for the Israeli Ministry of Defense, Drop Site News has learned. Merav Ceren’s appointment as Director for Israel and Iran at the NSC has not previously been reported, but her work with Israel’s MoD is well known among GOP circles.

War with Iran has nothing to do with US but everything to do with the real power in Washington.

https://mailchi.mp/libertarianinstitute/this-week-at-the-libertarian-institute-olhmx6gn9t-5848831-7hv9eay4br-5850066?e=de2d0eded6

Is Washington Occupied Territory?

-Kyle Anzalone

In 1990, Pat Buchanan argued that “Capitol Hill is Israeli-occupied territory.”

Over the past three and a half decades, it seems Tel Aviv has expanded its control to most of Washington.

As Drop Site News recently reported:


“The American official overseeing White House policy toward both Israel and Iran inside the National Security Council formerly worked for the Israeli Ministry of Defense, Drop Site News has learned. Merav Ceren’s appointment as Director for Israel and Iran at the NSC has not previously been reported, but her work with Israel’s MoD is well known among GOP circles.

Ceren’s appointment gives Israel an unusual advantage in internal policy discussions just as the Israeli government has launched a new campaign to pressure the American government to start a war with Iran rather than continue with negotiations toward a nuclear deal.

Ceren includes her time with Israel’s Ministry of Defense in her bio at the pro-Israel think tank Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD).

The Israeli campaign has forced the issue into the top echelons of government. At a high-level meeting reported on recently by the New York Times, Vice President JD Vance, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth all pushed back against Israel’s plan for a major strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities. They were even joined by NSC Director Michael Waltz, who warned that Israel’s effort would not succeed without ample US support. Waltz and CENTCOM commander, Gen. Michael Kurilla, the Times reported, had previously been open to entertaining the Israeli idea and were briefed by Israeli military officials on a range of plans.

It’s rare for a foreign country to be able to pitch American policymakers on a joint war effort and look across the table to see a former member of their own Ministry of Defense working for the Americans.”


Not only at the Pentagon and Capitol, but also in the White House you appear to need Israel’s permission to land a job.

See the rest here

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

Bureaucracies

Posted by M. C. on April 22, 2025

Procedures-procedures that ensure bureaucrats keep their job…no matter the cost to US.

https://www.youtube.com/@ThomasSowellGems/community

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

Survival

Posted by M. C. on April 21, 2025

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Happy Easter!

Posted by M. C. on April 20, 2025

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »