So three days after they say it came from a lab, they changed their position, and the only intervening event was a conference call with Dr. Fauci and Dr. Collins. Again, a call that Mr. Redfield (CDC Director at the time) was not allowed to be on … And then three months later, Shazam! They get 9 million bucks from Dr. Fauci. Why, isn’t that something?”
Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) was on fire Wednesday during the first COVID select subcommittee investigating the origins of Covid-19, where former CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield said he was “sidelined” from internal debates over the origins of the virus, and that former White House chief medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci didn’t appreciate Redfield’s support for the theory that it emerged from a lab.
“This was an a priori decision that there’s one point of view that we’re going to put out there, and anyone who doesn’t agree with it is going to be sidelined,” said Redfield. “And as I say, I was only the CDC director, and I was sidelined.”
The 71-year-old Redfield told Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) that his support for the lab leak theory likely prompted his exclusion.
Former CDC director Robert Redfield
“I think I made it very clear in January [2020] to all of them why we had to aggressively pursue this,” he said. “And I let them know as a virologist that I didn’t see that this was anything like SARS or MERS. … And they knew that was how I was thinking.”
Jordan then focused the conversation to two top Fauci advisers – Dr. Kristian Andersen and Dr. Robert Garry – who suddenly changed their stance on lab leak theory. The two notably emailed Fauci on Jan. 31, 2020 where they suggested that anomalies in the virus pointed to a non-natural origin. According to Anderson, the virus had “unusual features” that “(potentially) look engineered,” and that other scientists “all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory.”
In June, Jordan sent a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray warning that several former FBI officials were coming forward, while alleging the agency is “purging” employees who have conservative views.
Fourteen FBI whistleblowers have come forward to provide information to Republican congressional investigations, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) said on Aug. 14, about a week after the FBI raided former President Donald Trump’s Florida home.
“Fourteen FBI agents have come to our office as whistleblowers, and they are good people,” Jordan told Fox News. “There are lots of good people in the FBI. It’s the top that is the problem.”
“Some of these good agents are coming to us, telling us … what’s going on—the political nature now of the Justice Department … talking about the school board issue, about a whole host of issues,” he added.
Two months ago, Jordan said that six FBI whistleblowers approached the committee. Two came forward about a memo related to alleged violence and intimidation at school board meetings and four in connection to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol breach. In the Senate, meanwhile, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said in July that whistleblowers had come to his office to provide information, including disclosures relating to investigations into Hunter Biden’s overseas business dealings.
“It’s becoming a well-worn trail of agents who say this has got to stop, and thank goodness for them and that American people recognize it, and I believe they’re going to make a big change on Nov. 8,” Jordan said, referring to the midterm elections.
In June, Jordan sent a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray warning that several former FBI officials were coming forward, while alleging the agency is “purging” employees who have conservative views.
“In one such example, the FBI targeted and suspended the security clearance of a retired war servicemember who had disclosed personal views that the FBI was not being entirely forthcoming about the events of January 6,” Jordan wrote in a statement. “The FBI questioned the whistleblower’s allegiance to the United States despite the fact that the whistleblower honorably served in the United States military for several years—including deployments in Kuwait and Iraq—valiantly earning multiple military commendation medals.”
It comes as Republicans stepped up calls on Aug. 14 for the release of an FBI affidavit showing the justification for its seizure of documents at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home.
The true reason Fauci refused to get specific is because real the answer is zero – there is no new case number that will ever be low enough for the government to relinquish its death grip on society and the economy.
Pressed further on when Americans will regain basic Constitutional freedoms like assembly, Fauci replied, “I don’t see this as a liberty thing,”
Knowing Americans would never accept the permanent lockdown that he envisions, Fauci’s only recourse when pressed in public testimony is to play hide-the-ball and resort to tired appeals to safety and public health, etc.
The latest updates on the “new normal” – chronicling the lies, distortions, and abuses by the ruling class.
WHO Compares COVID ‘Vaccines’ to Umbrellas and Sunglasses in Childish Graphics
The canon of pandering, grasping-at-straws “vaccine art” by the social engineers has accumulated some sad new additions.
Brace yourself.
According to the WHO, which insists you play along with the delusion, injecting experimental mRNA vaccines with no long-term safety studies into your skin is basically the same as sunscreen to block UV rays
PR Machine Sets Its Sights on Unruly ‘White, Rural Conservatives’
The “vaccine” PR machine has subtly shifted its sights to target rural conservative whites premised on concerns over rampant vaccine hesitancy within that demographic:
“More than 45% of white, rural conservatives said they were unwilling even to consider taking the vaccine.”
For much of late 2020 and early 2021, the social engineers had instead focused their “vaccine” propaganda on the black community, which is historically suspicious of government medical advice given the genocidal Tuskegee Syphilis Experiments.
During these unethical experiments – officially titled “Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male” – government scientists injected rural blacks in Alabama with syphilis without their consent and then denied treatment. You know, just to see what happened.
“The goal was to ‘observe the natural history of untreated syphilis in black populations. But the subjects were unaware of this and were simply told they were receiving treatment for bad blood. Actually, they received no treatment at all.”
The unwitting test subjects got syphilis, suffered immensely, and then died.
The CDC via Bill Clinton issued a mea culpa in 1997 under pressure. Now, the agency would have everyone believe they are truly reformed from their historical roots of dangerous medical experimentation without informed consent:
“They believed they had found hope when they were offered free medical care by the United States Public Health Service. They were betrayed.”
The CDC’s image-rehabilitation efforts have not taken – not, at least, in the rural South. Check NPR’s classist accounting, dripping with visceral disgust, of white rural Americans who won’t take the shot:
“On a recent weekend in Hartsville, the local health department had trouble filling up even half the spots for a COVID-19 vaccination event… Down the street at the Piggly Wiggly grocery store, Cris Weske, 43, stopped in to buy a can of dipping tobacco… Weske, who is wearing a ‘We the People’ T-shirt, says the U.S. Constitution protects his choice to opt out of the massive nationwide vaccination effort.”
NPR here employs a psychological manipulation tactic called gaslighting.
Notice the subtle sleight of hand: Weske “says“ the United States Constitution protects his right to control what is injected into his bloodstream—not that it actually protects him, which it does both in letter and spirit.
Taxpayer-Funded Federal Judges Now Parsing Out the Legal Definition of ‘Masks’
American taxpayers pay Federal US District Judge Royce $218,600 per year – for what?
As a condition of pre-trial release, U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth – who has been feeding at the federal judiciary trough since 1974 — ordered that defendant Rachel Powell not just wear a mask, but the right kind, and not just at court but everywhere, all the time, just to stay out of jail:
“Defendant’s decision to appear in a video wearing a mask with holes in it at work mocks compliance with the Court’s Order setting as a condition of pre-trial release that she ‘wear a mask whenever she leaves her residence.’”
The mask deemed unacceptable to the Federal High Court
Powell stands accused of… operating a bullhorn on Capitol grounds or some vague non-violent crime during the Jan 6th protests at DC Swamp Ground Zero.
Per the guidelines in a super-official-sounding “notice” from the CDC (not a law), Powell’s COVID-burka inarguably meets the federal government’s own criteria for a “mask”:
“Mask means a material covering the nose and mouth of the wearer, excluding face shields.”
Essentially, by fiat, the federal judiciary now has carte blanche to arbitrarily imprison US citizens with no grounding in any federal law or statute.
‘What’s the Number?’: Fauci Refuses to Get Specific About End of Social Lockdowns
In an April 15 Congressional hearing showdown between Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) and Supreme Commander Lord-Doctor His Worshipfulness Anthony Fauci, he refused, yet again, to offer any concrete milestones for when social distancing restrictions might be lifted.
Jordan: In your written statement, you say ‘now is not the time to pull back on masking, physical distancing, and avoiding congregate settings.’ When is the time? When do Americans get their freedom back?
Fauci: When we get the level of infection in this country low enough that it is not a really high –
Jordan: What is ‘low enough’? Give me a number… What metrics, what measures, what has to happen before Americans get their freedoms back?
Fauci: My message… is to get as many people vaccinated as quickly as we possibly can…to get the level of infection in this country low so it is no longer a threat…
Jordan: What determines when? What? What measure?… What standard, what objective standard…?
…
This pointless exchange went on for several more rounds. At no point in his entire testimony to Jordan did Fauci offer any concrete goalposts – just “lower levels” of infection as the benchmark for lifting lockdowns.
The true reason Fauci refused to get specific is because real the answer is zero – there is no new case number that will ever be low enough for the government to relinquish its death grip on society and the economy.
Pressed further on when Americans will regain basic Constitutional freedoms like assembly, Fauci replied, “I don’t see this as a liberty thing,”
Knowing Americans would never accept the permanent lockdown that he envisions, Fauci’s only recourse when pressed in public testimony is to play hide-the-ball and resort to tired appeals to safety and public health, etc.
“Shut your mouth,” Slay Queen Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) concluded from behind her mask. That concluded Rep. Jordan’s fruitless questioning of Fauci.
Ben Bartee is a Bangkok-based American journalist with opposable thumbs. Contact him via his portfolio or on LinkedIn.
by TDBWednesday, Apr 28, 2021 – 12:50
MCViewPoint 
