MCViewPoint

Opinion from a Libertarian ViewPoint

Posts Tagged ‘Facebook’

TikTok is worse than you think. But no, it shouldn’t be banned.

Posted by M. C. on January 22, 2025

The TikTok Debate: Privacy, Manipulation, and a Dangerous Precedent

Data Collection: Beyond TikTok, platforms like Google, Facebook, and Instagram feed China through real-time bidding (RTB) systems, data brokers, and other pipelines.”

https://nbtv.substack.com/p/tiktok-is-worse-than-you-think-but

TikTok collects a staggering amount of data. Only recently, with the U.S. government moving to ban the app, have many begun to grasp the extent of its invasiveness. Beyond tracking what you watch and interact with, TikTok monitors every tap, keystroke, and interaction within its in-app browser.

Last year, the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act required ByteDance, TikTok’s Chinese parent company, to divest its U.S. operations or face a ban. Here’s the reasoning they gave:

  • Data Collection and Access: TikTok enables vast data collection, including location tracking, keystroke monitoring, and personal data aggregation. The Justice Department called this “unprecedented,” raising fears of espionage and exploitation by China.
  • National Security Threats: Officials warn of potential spying, blackmail, and recruitment by China using TikTok.
  • Content Manipulation: Concerns include the Chinese Communist Party manipulating TikTok’s algorithm to influence U.S. public opinion, suppress dissent, or spread disinformation.

Although ByteDance challenged the law on First Amendment grounds, the Supreme Court upheld it. A ban took effect on January 19, 2025, though enforcement remains uncertain after a delay announced by Trump. For now, TikTok’s future is in limbo.

So, why am I against a ban?

I’m a huge privacy advocate, and agree that TikTok is an atrocious piece of spyware. But banning it is the wrong solution. Here’s why:

1. It’s Ineffective

A ban won’t stop China—or others—from collecting data. China is already embedded in U.S. telecommunicationsIoT devices, and the data brokerage industry, which sells detailed profiles of Americans to foreign adversaries. TikTok is one piece of a larger puzzle.

  • Data Collection: Beyond TikTok, platforms like Google, Facebook, and Instagram feed China through real-time bidding (RTB) systems, data brokers, and other pipelines.
  • Manipulation: TikTok’s algorithm isn’t unique—other platforms also manipulate public opinion through content curation, advertising, and social graphs. This problem is actually a huge issue that we have to face, and a ban on TikTok won’t stop it.

2. It Creates a False Sense of Security

Banning TikTok might feel like a win, but it’s an illusion. Politicians get credit for “solving” the problem, while the real threats persist. People become complacent, assuming the issue is resolved, and the urgency to address broader privacy concerns fades.

3. It Sets a Dangerous Precedent

This is the most important reason: Censoring software establishes troubling government overreach into personal choices. Today it’s TikTok; tomorrow, it could be any software the government deems problematic. Perhaps it’s Signal private messenger for “lack of regulation and impeding national security,” a privacy coin for “enabling untraceable transactions,” VPNs for “bypassing government censorship,” or non-mainstream social media for “spreading misinformation.” This precedent risks eroding autonomy and critical thinking, leaving individuals reliant on the government to decide what’s safe.

The Bigger Issue: Privacy Violations Everywhere

See the rest here

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

9th Circuit: Feds Free to Censor ‘Anti-Vaccine’ ‘Misinformation’ Via Pressure on Social Media Companies

Posted by M. C. on August 21, 2024

What a wild coincidence: one branch of government (judiciary) doesn’t mind another branch of government (executive) doing whatever it likes extraconstitutionally.

That’s called Democracy™, boys and girls, and it’s sacred.

The Daily Bell

By Ben Bartee –

Originally published via Armageddon Prose:

What a wild coincidence: one branch of government (judiciary) doesn’t mind another branch of government (executive) doing whatever it likes extraconstitutionally.

That’s called Democracy™, boys and girls, and it’s sacred.

Via Reuters (emphasis added):

Meta Platforms defeated an appeal by Children’s Health Defense, an anti-vaccine group founded by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., challenging its censorship of Facebook posts that spread misinformation about vaccines’ efficacy and safety.

In a decision on Friday, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Pasadena, California, said the nonprofit did not show that Meta worked with or was coerced by federal officials to suppress views challenging “government orthodoxy” on vaccines.

Children’s Health Defense sued in 2020, saying that Meta had violated its constitutional rights by flagging “vaccine misinformation” as false, and taking away its right to advertise on Facebook.”

Not being a legal scholar, I’m sure there’s a good answer to this, but I’m not clear: why would CHD sue Meta and not the government for violating its First Amendment rights, when it was at the government’s behest that Meta acted?

Via Children’s Health Defense (emphasis added):

CHD’s suit accused the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and other federal agencies of “privatizing” the First Amendment by teaming up with Facebook to censor speech which, “under the Bill of Rights, the Government cannot censor.”

According to the lawsuit, filed in August 2020 — and amended in December 2020 — the CDC and the World Health Organization “collaborated closely with Facebook to suppress vaccine safety speech by using a ‘warning label’ and other similar types of notices which, while purporting to flag misinformation, in reality censor valid and truthful speech, including content posted by plaintiff on its Facebook page regarding vaccines.”

This collaboration amounted to “state action” and was in violation of the First Amendment, CHD said

See the rest here

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

I have been a bad boy on FB. I have “issues”. I must learn to follow the rules!

Posted by M. C. on December 30, 2023

You’re restricted from doing certain things on Facebook right now. Make sure you’re following the rules so you don’t risk losing your account.

Restrictions

What you can’t do across Facebook

Can’t create ads, create live videos, start or join calls

What’s in your account

Your main profile is responsible for all the things you manage.

Profile has some issues

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , | 3 Comments »

Smoking Gun: New Evidence Proves Biden White House Coerced Facebook’s Rampant Censorship. Plus: Lee Fang on DHS, New Epstein Connections, & Anheuser-Busch Lobbyists | SYSTEM UPDATE #119

Posted by M. C. on July 28, 2023

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Facebook and Google Allies Fight Revenue Sharing with Journalists by Invoking Hate Speech, Misinfo and ‘Straight White Men’

Posted by M. C. on June 3, 2023

Silicon Valley is battling the California Journalism Preservation Act, a bill that would force big tech companies to share advertising revenue with journalists.

https://www.leefang.com/p/facebook-and-google-allies-fight?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

LEE FANG

Facebook and Google are fighting a new California tax designed to boost local journalism by claiming that the proposal will instead spawn an avalanche of hate speech and misinformation.

The new tax, said Krisztian Katona, vice president of CCIA, a lobbying group for Google and Facebook, would reduce the ability to “take down hate speech and fight misinformation.”

Chamber of Progress, another lobby shop funded by Google and Facebook, and run by a former Google executive, similarly warned that the bill is a “boon for disinformation outlets” such as Fox News.

The deceptive arguments are designed to splinter support for the California Journalism Preservation Act, or AB 886, a California bill that would force social media platforms to share advertising revenue generated from news articles with publishers and media outlets. If enacted, the major tech companies, which profit from the advertising revenue generated by numerous news articles, would be forced into an arbitration process to determine how much revenue they would have to share with news outlets.

The tech industry’s claims about “hate speech” and “misinformation” are largely unsubstantiated. Social media firms already publish all types of content without sharing advertising revenue. The over-the-top rhetoric instead aims to turn a fight over advertising revenue in which Democrats are inclined to sympathize with local news outlets, into a battle over controversial speech and ideas that many liberal lawmakers have a predisposition to see as an existential threat. Since Democrats have a supermajority in California, these kinds of appeals could be enough to doom the legislation.

Opponents also used liberal tropes about race and gender to decry the legislation in a committee hearing about the bill in April.

Katharine Trendacosta of the Electronic Frontier Foundation said that the current state of online media helped people like her against the “general trend of media which is towards straight white males.” This legislation, she continued, “is a wealth transfer to these same billionaires.”

In a surprising retort, Assemblymember Bill Essayli, a Republican from Riverside who supports AB 886, asked Trendacosta about EFF’s ties to Google, a question she declined to directly answer. In the past, EFF, which is a nonprofit, has received funding from Google. In 2012, Google named EFF in court disclosures as one of the many groups it counts on to advocate on its behalf.

Big Tech has a history of using liberal rhetoric and targeted identity-based political giving to ingratiate itself with Democrats who might otherwise regulate them. Google, in particular, has supported identitarian causes to gain influence with Democratic politicians.

See the rest here

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

How The FBI Helps Ukrainian Intelligence Hunt ‘Disinformation’ On Social Media

Posted by M. C. on April 29, 2023

The FIB spending your tax dollars to give free stuff to one of the most corrupt entities on the planet.

https://open.substack.com/pub/leefang/p/how-the-fbi-helps-ukrainian-intelligence?utm_source=direct&r=iw8dv&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

LEE FANG

The Federal Bureau of Investigation pressures Facebook to take down alleged Russian “disinformation” at the behest of Ukrainian intelligence, according to a senior Ukrainian official who corresponds regularly with the FBI. The same official said that Ukrainian authorities define “disinformation” broadly, flagging many social media accounts and posts that he suggested may simply contradict the Ukrainian government’s narrative.

“Once we have a trace or evidence of disinformation campaigns via Facebook or other resources that are from the U.S., we pass this information to the FBI, along with writing directly to Facebook,” said llia Vitiuk, head of the Department of Cyber Information Security in the Security Service of Ukraine.

“We asked FBI for support to help us with Meta, to help us with others, and sometimes we get good results with that,” noted Vitiuk. “We say, ‘Okay, this was the person who was probably Russia’s influence.'”

Vitiuk, in an interview, said that he is a proponent of free speech and understands concerns around social media censorship. But he also admitted that he and his colleagues take a deliberately expansive view of what counts as “Russian disinformation.”

“When people ask me, ‘How do you differentiate whether it is fake or true?’ Indeed it is very difficult in such an informational flow,” said Vitiuk. “I say, ‘Everything that is against our country, consider it a fake, even if it’s not.’ Right now, for our victory, it is important to have that kind of understanding, not to be fooled.”

In recent weeks, Vitiuk said, Russian forces have used various forms of disinformation to manufacture fake tension between President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Valerii Zaluzhnyi, the four-star general who serves as commander-in-chief of Ukraine’s military.

Indeed, recent reports have focused on the relationship between the two Ukrainian leaders. The German newspaper Bild reported that Zelenskyy and Zaluzhnyi had argued regarding tactics deployed in the battle over Bakhmut. Vitiuk said that any notion of conflict between Zelenskyy and his military chief, however, is false.

See the rest here

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Why is Facebook censoring Sy Hersh’s NordStream report? – Responsible Statecraft

Posted by M. C. on April 24, 2023

The social media giant says his piece on US responsibility for blowing up the pipeline is false, allows other stories with proven dubious claims.

https://responsiblestatecraft.org/2023/04/21/why-is-facebook-censoring-sy-hershs-nordstream-report/

Written by
Branko Marcetic

Since the start of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, U.S. policy toward the conflict has inter-mingled uneasily with the U.S. government’s growing convergence with the social media platforms that make up today’s digital public square.

Tech companies have selectively relaxed their bans on violent and hate speech to align with Ukraine’s war effort, shuttered the accounts of media outlets critical of the war and U.S. policy to it, and seen a vast army of bots push content supporting Ukraine and its NATO partners. And now, Facebook is actively censoring and discouraging the sharing of Seymour Hersh’s reporting on the alleged U.S. role in the attack on the Nordstream pipelines.

As of Thursday, if you try to share on Facebook the February 8 Substack post in which Hersh first laid out the anonymously sourced charge, you’ll first be met with a prompt informing you about “additional reporting” on the subject in the form of Norwegian fact-checking website Faktisk, and warning you that “pages and websites that repeatedly publish or share false news will see their overall distribution reduced and be restricted in other ways.”

If you decide to “share anyway,” Hersh’s piece is posted but blurred out, and labeled “false information” by the social media platform. (It’s since been unblurred and labeled “partly false information”). The phenomenon was first pointed out by Michael Shellenberger, and has since been replicated by othersincluding myself.

Besides labeling the post as false, Facebook also sent me a notification roughly 10 hours later informing me about the notice they’d added and that I had shared something that “includes information that independent fact-checkers said was partly false.” Facebook cautions that “people who repeatedly share false information might have their posts moved lower in News Feed,” suggesting that if I go on to share any other reporting that’s been challenged by fact-checkers, I’ll be punished by having my account’s reach throttled.

Yet the fact-check in question from Faktisk — Norwegian for “Actually” — leans heavily on open source intelligence whose reliability has itself been recently challenged. Hersh has previously fended off criticism that his reporting doesn’t match up with public data about ship movements by arguing this information can be manipulated. Indeed, in a piece putting forward its own, alternate theory to Hersh’s, the New York Times itself noted that the pipelines weren’t closely monitored by commercial or government sensors, and that there were roughly 45 “ghost ships” whose location transponders weren’t on.

See the rest here

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

The ‘Twitter Papers’ Reveal the Totalitarians Among Us

Posted by M. C. on December 6, 2022

Wonder what CIA financed Facebook has been up to? The same as the FIB or CIA. Is it just “the same”?

The Ron Paul Liberty Report

https://rumble.com/v1z2djk-the-twitter-papers-reveal-the-totalitarians-among-us.html

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Watch “Peak ‘Woke’? Facebook, Netflix Crashing And Burning” on YouTube

Posted by M. C. on October 28, 2022

https://youtu.be/D6RjYjjv9aY

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

The Totally Not-Political FBI Pressures Facebook

Posted by M. C. on August 29, 2022

By Tom Woods

What they did do, Zuckerberg said, was downgrade posts about the Hunter Biden laptop so that fewer people would see them. When Rogan asked for specific numbers, Zuckerberg said he didn’t know them off the top of his head but conceded that the downgrading was significant.

From the Tom Woods Letter:

Two items for you today.

(1) Although the Big Tech platforms don’t exactly seem like they have to be dragged kicking and screaming into suppressing unpopular opinions, we keep learning about ways the federal government has been pressuring them to do so.

We found out quite recently that the federal government pressured Twitter to drop Alex Berenson, for example.

The latest case came just the other day, when Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg made an appearance on Joe Rogan’s podcast. Rogan asked him about the Hunter Biden laptop story, and we found out that the FBI had approached Facebook cautioning it against allowing the free dissemination of what it of course called Russian propaganda.

Zuckerberg said:

“The FBI basically came to us, some folks on our team, and was like, hey, just so you know, you should be on high alert. We thought there was a lot of propaganda in the 2016 election. We have it on notice that there is about to be some kind of dump that’s similar to that, so just be vigilant.

“So our protocol is different from Twitter’s. What Twitter did is they said you can’t share this at all. We didn’t do that.”

What they did do, Zuckerberg said, was downgrade posts about the Hunter Biden laptop so that fewer people would see them. When Rogan asked for specific numbers, Zuckerberg said he didn’t know them off the top of his head but conceded that the downgrading was significant.

Zuckerberg went on: “We just kind of thought, hey, look, if the FBI, which I still view as a legitimate institution in this country — it’s a very, very impressive law enforcement — they come to us and tell us that we need to be on guard about something, then I want to take that seriously.”

You think there’s the tiniest chance that the FBI is a political organization?

One favorable development has come from all this, at least: the right side of the ideological divide has rapidly shed its superstitious reverence for agencies like the FBI.

(2) On another note: in case you missed episode 2183 of the Tom Woods Show, I had a chance to speak to Mikkel Thorup, an expert on international relocation and expat issues, having visited 100 countries himself and lived in nine, and an expat himself for over 20 years.

I myself am too much of a homebody to leave the U.S., but I know for a fact that more of my readers than ever are considering their international options, whether that’s outright relocation or measures short of that, like second citizenships and the like.

See the rest here

Be seeing you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »