Nobel Prize For Nuclear Re-Armament/Serious Consideration Of Low Yield Nukes
Posted by M. C. on August 1, 2016
Peace prize ‘winner’ Barack Obama wants to spend a $Trillion to upgrade the US nuclear arsenal.
The latest and greatest is ‘adjustable yield’. Want to take out a reinforced bunker, a few square miles, a city or a whole province? Just twist a dial. How can a general have more fun?
What better way to justify a nuke strike than to say we will make a PRECISION nuclear strike. Precision as in when we make a signature strike on a wedding party or a gaggle of farmers carrying rakes and shovels that someone looking at a screen in Kansas thinks are AK 47s.
This not a good thing. People are talking seriously about using low yield nukes.
Part of the deal is obviously to poke Russia and China. War party neocons and their White House marionette need more war or least the artificially generated threat to justify bigger budgets, expand their expansive power and kill off what liberties we have left.
This is about keeping us in line too, not just ‘them’.
I wonder what the Nobel peace prize committee thinks of their golden boy now.
Aren’t these the same guys that awarded Yassir Arafat the peace prize?
Then there is NYT house Keynesian economist Paul Krugman…
Be seeing you
MCViewPoint 
Robert Cogan said
Yeah, Obama has sold more weapons than any earlier President.
https://www.thenation.com/article/the-obama-administration-has-sold-more-weapons-than-any-other-administration-since-world-war-ii/