Opinion from a Libertarian ViewPoint

Nobel Prize For Nuclear Re-Armament/Serious Consideration Of Low Yield Nukes

Posted by M. C. on August 1, 2016

Peace prize ‘winner’ Barack Obama wants to spend a $Trillion to upgrade the US nuclear arsenal.

The latest and greatest is ‘adjustable yield’. Want to take out a reinforced bunker, a few square miles, a city or a whole province? Just twist a dial. How can a general have more fun?

What better way to justify a nuke strike than to say we will make a PRECISION nuclear strike. Precision as in when we make a signature strike on a wedding party or a gaggle of farmers carrying rakes and shovels that someone looking at a screen in Kansas thinks are AK 47s.

This not a good thing. People are talking seriously about using low yield nukes.

Part of the deal is obviously to poke Russia and China. War party neocons and their White House marionette need more war or least the artificially generated threat to justify bigger budgets, expand their expansive power and kill off what liberties we have left.

This is about keeping us in line too, not just ‘them’.

I wonder what the Nobel peace prize committee thinks of their golden boy now.

Aren’t these the same guys that awarded Yassir Arafat the peace prize?

Then there is NYT house Keynesian economist Paul Krugman…

Be seeing you


One Response to “Nobel Prize For Nuclear Re-Armament/Serious Consideration Of Low Yield Nukes”

  1. Robert Cogan said

    Yeah, Obama has sold more weapons than any earlier President.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: