MCViewPoint

Opinion from a Libertarian ViewPoint

Posts Tagged ‘DEA’

A History of Asset Forfeiture | Mises Wire

Posted by M. C. on March 1, 2019

Get pulled over with what some armed government employee considers too much cash and you can say good bye.

Legalized theft just like taxes only you don’t have to fill out a form, except NO refunds.

https://mises.org/wire/history-asset-forfeiture

In 1991, Maui police officers showed up at the home of Frances and Joseph Lopes. One officer showed his badge and said, “Let’s go into the house, and we will explain things to you.” Once he was inside, the explanation was simple: “We’re taking the house.”

The Lopses were far from wealthy. They worked on a sugar plantation for nearly fifty years, living in camp housing, to save up enough money to buy a modest, middle-class home. But in 1987, their son Thomas was caught with marijuana. He was twenty-eight, and he suffered from mental health issues. He grew the marijuana in the backyard of his parents’ home, but every time they tried to cut it down, Thomas threatened suicide. When he was arrested, he pled guilty, was given probation since it was his first offense, and he was ordered to see a psychologist once a week. Frances and Joseph were elated. Their son got better, he stopped smoking marijuana, and the episode was behind them.

But when the police showed up and told them that their house was being seized, they learned that the episode was not behind them. That statute of limitations for civil asset forfeiture was five years. It had only been four. Legally, the police could seize any property connected to the marijuana plant from 1987. They had resurrected the Lopes case during a department-wide search through old cases looking for property they could legally confiscate. Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Name One Government Agency that Doesn’t Do the Exact Opposite of its Purpose | The Daily Bell

Posted by M. C. on December 10, 2018

Without an EPA, people would depend on a marketplace of organizations for information about products like Monsanto’s. And even if these organizations didn’t have the power to ban the chemicals, they could inform the market and hit Monsanto where it hurts, the wallet.

https://www.thedailybell.com/all-articles/news-analysis/name-one-government-agency-that-doesnt-do-the-exact-opposite-of-its-purpose/

By Joe Jarvis

A DEA agent is accused of facilitating drug trafficking in the regions he oversaw in Florida and Arkansas. He allegedly traded inside information to drug runners in exchange for cash.

Drugs are illegal. But you can still run drugs with the right person being paid off. And you can do it for very little money–this agent got around $62,000 from one dealer for his role.

That is enough money to easily corrupt an individual, but a small price to pay compared to how much a drug dealer can make. Especially when you have the DEA looking the other way and giving you a heads up before raids.

But this isn’t surprising. We have heard the same story a thousand times before. This is how the government operates.

Monsanto is one of the worst environmental offenders, besides the government itself. Their flagship product Roundup is blamed for mass die-offs of honey bees and has been linked to cancer.

Monsanto got its start making chemicals for the military and later moved into pesticides. But their crony-relationship remained. Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Civil Forfeiture Video: A Huge Money Tree for Cops

Posted by M. C. on September 16, 2018

Civil forfeiture in the United States, also called civil asset forfeiture or civil judicial forfeiture[1] or occasionally civil seizure, is a legal process in which law enforcement officers take assets from persons suspected of involvement with crime or illegal activity without necessarily charging the owners with wrongdoing. While civil procedure, as opposed to criminal procedure, generally involves a dispute between two private citizens, civil forfeiture involves a dispute between law enforcement and property such as a pile of cash or a house or a boat, such that the thing is suspected of being involved in a crime. To get back the seized property, owners must prove it was not involved in criminal activity.

Guilty until proven innocent. Proving innocence is extremely difficult and cops know that.

Don’t hear much about this widespread abuse in the media.

https://www.garynorth.com/public/18567.cfm

Gary North

This video explains it. Your property (unlike you) is guilty until proven innocent — at your expense.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Doug Casey on the “Politically Correct” Movement – Casey Research

Posted by M. C. on September 10, 2018

https://www.caseyresearch.com/doug-casey-on-the-politically-correct-movement/

Founder

Justin Spittler: Doug, I want to ask you about political correctness. Obviously, PC culture’s nothing new, but it kind of seems like it’s spreading like cancer these days. Terms like “gender inclusivity,” “cultural appropriation,” and “white privilege” are everywhere.

A good example is last year’s announcement by the University of Minnesota… saying it was dropping the names “Homecoming King and Queen” in favor of “Royals.” It did this in the name of “gender inclusivity.”

Is PC culture getting totally out of hand, or am I going crazy?

Doug Casey: Parts of the culture are borderline insane. There’ve been news items regarding this on scores of different colleges and universities across the US. What you mentioned at the University of Minnesota was just part of a greater movement. Although I’ve got to say that I find the use of “Royals” objectionable. I dislike the idea of a hereditary aristocracy—kings and queens and royals. They’re basically just successful, silk-clad gangsters. Why the royal family in Britain is looked up to is a mystery to me. They, like all royals in the world, historically are just descendants of successful thugs.

But that’s not the point that the PC people are making. They don’t want to see people identified by their birth sex. They would rather that people “identify” as whatever gender—and I understand there are supposed to be about 40—you feel you belong to. You can say you are whoever you think you are. And oddly enough, I’m somewhat sympathetic to that. I think you should be able to call yourself what you want, do what you want, say what you want, this is all fine. And let people judge you by how you identify yourself. Say that you’re a hermaphrodite dinosaur who was born on Mars, if you want. I don’t care; it’s your problem. But these PC types want to legislate that people have to treat the psychologically aberrated as if they were normal. They want laws and punishments governing what you can and can’t do and say and even feel. They want to force you to respect, and pay for, the fantasies of a minority. And change—overturn actually—the whole social culture of the country. It’s a very disturbing trend. It’s likely to end in violence… Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

DEA Blames Changing Public Opinion – LewRockwell

Posted by M. C. on December 18, 2016

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/12/no_author/dea-blames-changing-public-opinion/

Right hand contradicts left hand. The public loses.

Be seeing you

phoca_thumb_l_tcobb34

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

NSA and Patriot Act-New Mirrors, Different Color Smoke

Posted by M. C. on June 3, 2015

Does anyone seriously think the delayed renewal of the Patriot Act caused the NSA to break stride in vacuuming our personal communications? The Patriot Act is a feel good PR stunt to legitimize blatant illegal activity. Likewise the rubber stamp, secret FISA court. The consensus is the fine print in the Freedom Act make it worse than what it is replacing.

Spying on citizens isn’t new. Omnivore, carnivore, echelon and prism are a just few secret programs dating back to at least the ‘60s. Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

I Am Innocent, I have Nothing To Fear

Posted by M. C. on August 14, 2013

I am always amazed when someone says: “I haven’t done anything wrong. I have nothing to fear.” If you have nothing to fear from the government, why did the Founding Fathers put the protections in the Constitution that Bush and Obama have stripped out? Unlike the Founding Fathers who designed our government to protect the citizens, the American sheeple trust the government to their own demise.

In the famous play, “A Man For All Seasons,” Sir Thomas More, Chancellor of England, asks: So, you would have me to cut down the law in order to chase after devils? And what will we do, with the law cut down, when the devil turns on us?

From Paul Craig Roberts here.

I too wonder what people aren’t thinking when they say “it will never happen to me”.

The patriot act is used more for drug arrests than terrorism arrests.  Who knows what flimsy excuse is being made to invade our privacy to justify an arrest.  You have to remember all these spy agencies and as well as the DHS, FBI, DEA, ATF have to justify their existence.  That means arrests.  Pay raises and promotions depend on it.  Actual guilt is a secondary consideration.

You may have read of the recent incident Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Gun Violence: Why Doesn’t Obama Target Gangs? Collusion With Sinaloa Drug Gang?

Posted by M. C. on January 11, 2013

When you combine total domestic surveillance, construction of FEMA re-education camps, Cloward-Pivin style destruction of the economy, government encouragement of psychoanalysis and drug treatment of “victims” and continued expansion of the warfare welfare state-complete disarmament of the populace is a logical next step.  Think of the most prominent gun control advocates of the last century and THEIR methods.  Hitler, Stalin, Mao.  Progressives on steroids.

Jon Rappoport made a list of answers he wants to hear from Obama with regard to gun violence.  A few of which are:

Where is most of the violence occurring? Big city gangs.  Why no mention?

Is the Second Amendment designed in part for common folk to defend themselves from tyrannical government?

Why no mention of the plethora of antidepressants that drive people to murder or suicide?

The point Rappoport makes is that the impetus for gun control is not violence reduction but simple elimination of all privately owned firearms. Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

CIA/DEA They Eat Their Own

Posted by M. C. on December 13, 2012

The day after my previous post I see this.

Drug enforcement and INS agents are not even safe from the CIA’s wrath.

Our drug agents are well-trained with firearms.  They can commit suicide by shooting themselves in the head…twice!

The William Norman Grigg link above mentions President Clinton and VP Gore.  Using drug money to influence Dominican Republic elections certainly puts Clinton’s so-called love of the Haiti Isle in a different light.  My guess is this sort of thing did not start in that particular administration.

Be seeing you – maybe

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Edukashun-DEA style

Posted by M. C. on July 30, 2011

Mary Sanchez recently had a column taking Michelle Bachmann to task which illustrates the thinking that has us sliding toward disaster. Bachmann rightly advocates shutting down the Department of Education. Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Budget, Education | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »